Marge Simpson in...Playboy

[silasbufu]

Hugh..you must be at least 1/16 japanese if this was your idea

 

[Vanguard_Ex]

No, no that was not a typo.
http://tv.uk.msn.com/news/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=150132190&GT1=61503&ocid=ukhotmail

The link above directs you to MSN news, where the article describes it in a bit more detail. Is it wrong to have a cartoon character in a magazine like Playboy? Or is the concept of beauty itself enough? Please, discuss.

You dont know much about japan do you? They have whole magazines dedicated to what some might call "cartoon porn". It's new to be seen out of the internet in the west though, so that's a new development.

Truth

Okay, who cares?

Evidently not you, although I'm not sure that applies to the other 83 posts so speak for yourself.

 

[General Vagueness]

As a pervert I'm outraged, but as a simpsons fan I'm intregued.

Almost the opposite here-- I like the toon stuff but they could've gotten a hundred better characters for the job than Marge Simpson.

 

[tk1989]

What? Really, why? what's the point?

I think theyre trying to cater to a younger audience... whatever that means. I think the average age of a playboy reader is in their late thirties, and in recent years their circulation has dropped significantly. Through this they hope to bring in the 20 something folk

 

[Chicago Ted]

Isn't there enough Rule 34 for this stuff already?

 

[Chicago Ted]

Edit: Sorry double post

 

[the protaginist]

That's nice, can we have Lois Griffin now please?

I'm gonna get flamed for this, but yes please.

On topic, I find it weird for a print publication since I'm used to this being an internet thing, but I'm not really grossed out. Like several said before me it's probably just a gimmick.

3rd'd?

Anyway, I guess I can understand where there coming from with this, but there are several better looking animated women on the Telly. Plus, Marge is... Yellow.

 

[Vanguard_Ex]

No, no that was not a typo.
http://tv.uk.msn.com/news/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=150132190&GT1=61503&ocid=ukhotmail

The link above directs you to MSN news, where the article describes it in a bit more detail. Is it wrong to have a cartoon character in a magazine like Playboy? Or is the concept of beauty itself enough? Please, discuss.

You dont know much about japan do you? They have whole magazines dedicated to what some might call "cartoon porn". It's new to be seen out of the internet in the west though, so that's a new development.

Truth

Okay, who cares?

Evidently not you, although I'm not sure that applies to the other 83 posts so speak for yourself.

Hmmm? It was a question, Not a statement.
I wasn't trying to speak for everyone else idiot.
Hurf durf fdsdfsds

I didn't say it was a statement, idiot. And yes, you were.
http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/files/images/obvious_troll.preview.jpg

 

[Woem]

It's really not an unusual concept. In Belgium we have a popular comic Kiekeboe which features a babe character called Fanny. She was on the cover of man magazine P-Magazine twice before:

 

[Vuljatar]

This just strikes me as sort of odd. But... whatever.

Well, Lois would've been a better choice

Yeah...

 

[incognito_me]

Didn't they already do something like this with Rayne from BloodRayne awhile back?

 

[KurtzGallahad]

wow, why would they do that rather than a hot cartoon character,

P.S nice battlesuit

 

[asdasdasdasda]

uh... sexy. not.

>.>
<.<

seriously, how is marge simpson in the least bit sexy?
D:

Dude! Blue hair.. arm.. thing!

It's huge, wait, what?

 

[Griphphin]

Whether or not America is ready for this kind of thing, I would pay a lot of money to be the one to explain this to Bill O'Reiley xD

 

[QuirkyTambourine]

What what what!!!??

This is....creepy.... But then again, rule 34.

The thing is, I'm pretty sure that pictures involving her in very very childhood ruining "situations" have existed for I believe longer than Rule 34. Don't ask me how I know, I just do.

Anyways, I still miss the days where Playboy would publish a new Bradbury short story. Do they do much in the way of articles anymore?

 

[Woem]

Eh, playboy has been milking the "whores of gaming" for years. Why not another animated character. Sad thing is is that this really is a big thing for playboy. Playboy is generally for people who want to know how to wire their 5.1 as there is really fuck all nudity at all in it. Like what 1/8th is nudity. And even then it is only tits. Fucking waste of time.
Anyway as for Marge, they had better get their own art and not just nab shit off rule34 the cheap bastards.

I didn't know rule34 so I check it out, and that image from Marge is indeed there. I assume they didn't get that image from Playboy so I suppose the image I posted might not actually be from the Playboy magazine and I need to double-check my sources [http://www.zattevrienden.be/sfw/marge-simpson-fotoshoot-voor-de-playboy].