"Eye seizures due to Pokemon restore full eye functionality"Donnyp said:Probably due to all the movements and Colours hitting being received by his eye. Nifty to say the least. Now lets have him watch the Pokemon episode with Porygon lol.
"Eye seizures due to Pokemon restore full eye functionality"Donnyp said:Probably due to all the movements and Colours hitting being received by his eye. Nifty to say the least. Now lets have him watch the Pokemon episode with Porygon lol.
I just read that article and halfway down there was a spot reserved for advertisements, naturally, it was a large animated ad for the Nintendo DS price cut.SomeBoredGuy said:Wait, the Daily Mail? Isn't that the one that published the story of the mum that bought her four children a single DS and called video games a toxic drug when she found the four of them arguing over the brand new toy they had to share? [http://www.mcvuk.com/news/30482/Daily-Mail-takes-another-potshot-at-games] Hypocrisy much?
I dunno, Mario Kart has a shitload going on at any time. Shooters have things to look at to shoot, normal racers have other cars, platformers have platforms. Mario Kart has other karts, weird track layouts, boosts/jumps, items, item boxes, weaponry and all kinds of other crap.danpascooch said:Well if it's about making the eye work harder, of course videogames are an excellent way to do that!
Although I doubt there is anything special about Mario Kart over most other videogames
You sound oddly unsurprised.AngryMongoose said:Interesting...
"Source: Daily Mail"
Oh.
I've always wondered what the logic behind that was.Fraught said:Ha, that's just awesome.
And yeah, it has been pretty much a universally used statement that videogames, and electronics of any kind slowly make you lose your eyesight.
What do you think now, parents?
It's not misinformation. Likewise a video game would work better than a TV series because you have to tell yourself to concentrate on things on a TV screen. With a video game it comes naturally because you invest in the character you control.theklng said:oh yes clearly this is the GAME's credit, NOT the monitor giving visual clues to him. my bet it any other game OR cartoon OR tv series (to a certain degree) would have had the exact same effect on him. and when i say to a certain degree i mean that there would need to be a certain amount of color on screen before improvement would be likely to happen.
in either case, mariokart/nintendo receives no brownie points here, and neither does the stupidity at work in giving free advertising for nintendo because of misinformation.
Woodsey said:THIS IS FROM THE DAILY MAIL!?
What the fu-
The_root_of_all_evil said:*twitch* Daily Mail reporting *twitch*
comadorcrack said:I had to go back and check... Yes it was from the Mail...SomeBoredGuy said:Wait, the Daily Mail? Isn't that the one that published the story of the mum that bought her four children a single DS and called video games a toxic drug when she found the four of them arguing over the brand new toy they had to share? [http://www.mcvuk.com/news/30482/Daily-Mail-takes-another-potshot-at-games] Hypocrisy much?
I was absolutely convinced it was like physically impossible for the Mail to produce a positive story... Let along one on Video games!!!
"For Every Action, there is an equal and opposite Reaction"AngryMongoose said:Interesting...
"Source: Daily Mail"
Oh.
This is the Daily Mail we're talking about. The UK tabloid most likely to campaign to ban all video games, printing a good news story about video games. Fanboy or anti-fanboy, Nintendo earns many brownie points because it's the inverse of what we expect to see from the Mail on video games.theklng said:oh yes clearly this is the GAME's credit, NOT the monitor giving visual clues to him. my bet it any other game OR cartoon OR tv series (to a certain degree) would have had the exact same effect on him. and when i say to a certain degree i mean that there would need to be a certain amount of color on screen before improvement would be likely to happen.
in either case, mariokart/nintendo receives no brownie points here, and neither does the stupidity at work in giving free advertising for nintendo because of misinformation.
I thought that was just an urban-myth thing; an attempt to make the "square-eyes" thing when you sit in front of the TV seem more credible.Jack and Calumon said:Woodsey said:THIS IS FROM THE DAILY MAIL!?
What the fu-The_root_of_all_evil said:*twitch* Daily Mail reporting *twitch*comadorcrack said:I had to go back and check... Yes it was from the Mail...SomeBoredGuy said:Wait, the Daily Mail? Isn't that the one that published the story of the mum that bought her four children a single DS and called video games a toxic drug when she found the four of them arguing over the brand new toy they had to share? [http://www.mcvuk.com/news/30482/Daily-Mail-takes-another-potshot-at-games] Hypocrisy much?
I was absolutely convinced it was like physically impossible for the Mail to produce a positive story... Let along one on Video games!!!"For Every Action, there is an equal and opposite Reaction"AngryMongoose said:Interesting...
"Source: Daily Mail"
Oh.
-Newton's Third Law of Motion.
Calumon: I thought Gaming was bad for your eyes?
I'm sorry, but your eyesight is in the other castle? Sorry, couldn't help it...Lavoscraft said:Mario. Not only saving the princess but eyesight as well!