CymTyr said:
I took JKD for a couple of years, it's a very aggressive form of martial arts, but relies on making your opponent move first, and then counter-acting (a lot of the time).
JKD (Jeet Kun Do - sp?) is the martial art that Bruce Lee created. Its emphasis lies within being practical enough for street fighting, but also in being structured enough that you have a lot of self-discipline.
There are books Lee himself published regarding this martial art, and there are a lot of experts who have manuals on it as well.
Problem is JKD trainers are tough to find in some places, so good luck if you choose to go this route.
...One can't really take JKD. It's not a style. It's a philosophy on fighting in general. It's like taking a class on reading cook books instead of a cooking class. Yeah, you'll learn some great recipe's, but you haven't learned to cook yet.
I've read the "Tao of", and his "lost" notes that Linda Lee Caldwell hoarded for 20 years to make more money off of. He always talks about students of the philosophy of JKD already being practitioners of the martial arts.
By it's very design, it was meant to be more of a martial arts supplement; you take what you know and you incorporate Bruce Lee's philosophy. Sure, he does give some good tips regarding punching and kicking more efficiently, but seeing as he disavows the usefulness of fixed positions, there is no real "style" to learn.
If you did take a JKD class, it's more then likely your teacher was either showing your some old school wushu, or (from the sounds of it) judo, with some JKD principles sprinkled on top. I'm not saying that your teachers didn't give you the legit principles behind the philosophy, but I'm not happy with the way JKD has been taunted around in recent years.
Oh, and Bruce wasn't a pacifist at all. He had a lot to say on preemptive striking.