Most people generally agree that ME2 was a huge improvement on the first game. This is due to an overhaul on how the combat system works and how they implemented the RPG elements. The only thing that is generally disliked was the planet scanner in lieu of the mako, which really was a moot point in my opinion. I think the story was a good progression from where the first left off and left us with a great set up into the third.
That being said, will the third be a better game? If everything were kept essentially the same but the story would it be considered a success? Sequels of games are usually considered worse if it is the same game because it's not "groundbreaking". I know that this seems to be the case in the Bioshock 2 reviews. People are generally unhappy they didn't add anything. So if everything is kept the same but the story is an amazing conclusion will it be considered better?
If they need to change certain things to tweak the game further, what will it be? How can bioware make Mass Effect 3 a better game?
That being said, will the third be a better game? If everything were kept essentially the same but the story would it be considered a success? Sequels of games are usually considered worse if it is the same game because it's not "groundbreaking". I know that this seems to be the case in the Bioshock 2 reviews. People are generally unhappy they didn't add anything. So if everything is kept the same but the story is an amazing conclusion will it be considered better?
If they need to change certain things to tweak the game further, what will it be? How can bioware make Mass Effect 3 a better game?