Mass Effect review (because goatzilla and obliviam need to stop the petty crap)

Recommended Videos

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
You stand victorious over the hordes of beasts that have clawed at you, come close to killing you, and are menaces to the galaxy. Finally, it?s down to you and the last of its species. It shows remorse, it knows why it had to be wiped out. It seems that it has learnt its lesson, it wants a chance to live, a chance to see its children thrive. You alone have the choice of life and death. Kill it, and the entire galaxy will be thankful. Kill it, and you?ll effectively be guilty of genocide. Welcome to the world of Mass Effect.

Set 200 odd years in the future, after humanity has discovered new alien technology and hyperspace travel, the plot reads like almost every sci-fi game ever made. You know, there?s some kind of threat to the universe and it?s up to you as Captain America to end it by traveling about in a spaceship named after an American military victory etc. But a couple of twists on a tried and tested formula make this game compelling and compulsory playing.

First of all, humanity is rather late to the hyperspace game, and it finds itself in an uncomfortable position as an outsider. Humanity is distrusted amongst the other races of the galaxy (this comes up almost incessantly), and is only recently been given a morsel of power in galactic affairs. Every move you make is being watched by others, some wanting humanity to thrive, some wanting it to be subservient.

It all makes for some fascinating game play when faced with the choices that almost every quest brings up. You not only have to think of yourself and the character you?re playing, but the consequences of your actions as a representative of the human race.

One of the most compelling aspects of this game are the moral choices that you are forced to make with almost every quest. How you handle any given situation will give you food for thought. Combined with the well drawn characters, this makes for compelling game play. For example, do you try to handle a hostage situation all guns blazing or do you try to resolve the situation peacefully using a bit of the ol? charm/intimidate? The ability to try and talk out a situation rather than go in all guns blazing is a refreshing change from the ?go here, shoot that? linear mentality of most games today.

For example, during the main quest, you not only have the lives of your squad in your hands but often you are forced to choose whether a party member survives or not. It?s one of the oldest tricks in the book, but it?s still effective in investing the player in the game morally and emotionally and also getting the player to think about the wider scope of their actions.

Much has been made by the tomes of dialogue that the game throws at you, and with good reason. Sometimes the sheer amount of it can seem a little overbearing, but instead, the dialogue system, instead of bogging you down in the mire seems organic and natural because of the conversation wheel. This sees the player giving a response to a particular bit of dialogue not once the particular line of dialogue has been finished, but a few seconds before. This feels more like a natural conversation, as in most conversations, people are busy thinking of a response rather than listening to what is being said. Of course, this leads to missing out on a bit of dialogue, but it?s a feature that is remarkably well implemented. You actually feel as if you're having a conversation rather than choosing a response after having a good long while to think about the implications of your choice. Though by far the most impressive part of the dialogue is the superb voice acting.

Almost all of the dialogue is this game sounds pitch perfect for the situations you are confronted with, and this doesn't just cover the main characters. The amount of interesting characters you will meet are staggering, and this can be attributed to the fact that not one sounds like the other. They all have their nuances, and the voice acting reflects this perfectly.By far the most impressive voice acting comes from the male and female versions of the main character, Shepard (played by Mark Meer and Jennifer Hale respectively), with their dialogue spot on for the vast majority of situations, a quite lofty achievement given the reams of dialogue they spout. An honourable mention must go to Steven Barr for creating the enigmatic Urdnott Wrex, who although a murderous alien, is someone you you'd actually want to have a conversation with.

However, if there is one criticism of the voice acting in Mass Effect it has to be directed to Raphael Sbarge and the character of Kaidan Alenko. You see, Alenko?s voice seems a little?familiar, and if you?ve played Bioware?s other space Action/RPG Knights of the Old Republic, you?d recognise the voice of Kaidan Alenko as the voice of Carth Onasi. I say recognise, but they are the same voice. Exactly. I?m all for voice actors working on more than one project, but there?s just no difference between the performances! People who have played KOTOR will become frustrated by the character very quickly.

Another source of frustration for the player lies in the combat. Employing a third person shooter approach, the mechanics of the fighting are simple enough and will take only a short while to become accustomed to. However, what really grates is the way that squad members are used. In a party of three, commands of ?defend?, ?attack that guy? and ?go there? can be issued at any given time which is all well and fine?if you could issue the orders individually. You see, when you give a command such as ?go there behind that hyper galactic space crate?, both of your allies go. This can be an immense source of frustration if say, you want to issue an order of ?you go there, and you go to the other side. I?ll stay here with my sniper rifle while you two flank and draw out the enemy?. I found myself reflecting on how this could be useful every time my character died from being flanked by the enemy.

Those familiar with KOTOR will feel right at home when it comes to weapon customisation and inventory management. A number of upgrades can be applied to items (such as guns and armour) to increase their effectiveness against certain types of enemy, and these upgrades for the most part really help you out.

Force powers, I mean, biotic powers also make an appearance in the game. These cycle through your standard lift/throw with the power of your mind, kind of powers to more advanced powers such as stasis or singularity and how many you can use and their effectiveness depends on what type of character class you choose. For example, you can?t run around throwing enemies about like rag dolls if you?ve chosen the soldier class. There only about seven powers in total and whereas these biotic powers are useful on occasion, one gets the yearning for there to have more powers to play with.

The graphics and sound in this game really do stand out from the pack though.

The graphics, while not hyper-realistic are something to behold. The light reflecting from the gentle glow of ship nav systems, the sparkle of water and the dialogue scenes (which at times look pre-rendered they?re that good) all combine well to suck the player into the world. However, for some reason the game comes with film grain turned on, which just looks like the dog?s breakfast rather than filmic. Thankfully, this can be turned off otherwise I would have to take vengeance upon the world (yes, it looks that bad).

The sound in Mass Effect and particularly the score are absolutely top notch. This is one of the few games today that you?d want to buy the soundtrack for with the score taking you back to the glorious days of the 80?s sci-fi. It really sets you in that world when you hear an awesome synth piece playing in the background. It's pitch perfect every time for setting the mood whether travelling, going into a creepy room or coming up to a major plot point.

Special mention has to go to Canadian indie band Faunts and their song ?m4 pt II? which plays over the credits and captures the feel and tone of game perfectly. It?s one of the very rare times that you?ll actually want to watch the credits.

Overall, though frustrating at times, its flaws can be overlooked because of the journey the game provides for the player, one that you actually care about (which is a nice change). In a few areas such as character dimension and voice acting it sets the benchmark for all other action/RPG?s to follow.

Depending on your disposition, you will either love every minute of Mass Effect, overlooking its flaws or be ultimately frustrated by the fact this could be a masterpiece if not for the couple of things dragging it down.

Buy it
 

Pulsifer

New member
Dec 26, 2007
25
0
0
Thank you for a very nice review. You've finally given me the excuse to buy a 360 and Mass Effect when my paycheck comes in in two weeks! I've been wanting to for a long while, but have been unable to find a decently written review that I could get behind. And kudos for not falling into the trap of overdoing situational references. Yahtzee does that; his reviews are atrocious and fairly useless as far as analysis goes, but make up for it by being hilarious. (He, of course, knows this and references to it himself)

9/10 review score.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
Pulsifer said:
9/10 review score.
I do believe that's the first time any work of mine has been rated outside of an academic context. Thank you though.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
I didn't mean to insinuate that you were being condescending. I was merely reflecting upon the fact that you don't see too many reviews being rated with an actual score. The thank you was genuine.
 

Zera

New member
Sep 12, 2007
408
0
0
Good job studying about the staff of the game a bit and a good review after all. However, and this is just me, you probably should go for brevity because a lot of words scare away people. Just saying.

Now since I criticized your review, yall check out my review on Bleach and tell me what I think
 

wilsonscrazybed

thinking about your ugly face
Dec 16, 2007
1,654
0
41
Zera said:
However, and this is just me, you probably should go for brevity because a lot of words scare away people.
There is no problem with using vocabulary that articulates your review. Some of those 'big words' can serve the same purpose of entire sentences. Just don't get out of hand and replace your natural writing voice with words copied from a thesaurus. My rule of thumb: If you read it aloud and sound like 'Little Lord Fauntleroy' then tone it down some. Otherwise, don't waste all that money you spent on your education pandering to people who don't know the meaning of obtuse.

Zera, that last bit is not a shot at you at all. I just don't agree with your opinion about this author. I didn't find the review wordy or incoherent.
 

JimboG

New member
Dec 24, 2007
51
0
0
Zera said:
Good job studying about the staff of the game a bit and a good review after all. However, and this is just me, you probably should go for brevity because a lot of words scare away people.
Maybe brevity is the answer. Maybe "paragraphs" is a better one.

Good review, although it was daunting being confronted with a wall of text with no breaks.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
JimboG said:
Zera said:
Good job studying about the staff of the game a bit and a good review after all. However, and this is just me, you probably should go for brevity because a lot of words scare away people.
Maybe brevity is the answer. Maybe "paragraphs" is a better one.
Err, double paragraph spaced and with no paragraph lasting longer than six lines not good enough for you?
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
JimboG said:
Zera said:
Good job studying about the staff of the game a bit and a good review after all. However, and this is just me, you probably should go for brevity because a lot of words scare away people.
Maybe brevity is the answer. Maybe "paragraphs" is a better one.

Good review, although it was daunting being confronted with a wall of text with no breaks.
Herein lies the final irony

*bows*
 

RevolutionMan

New member
Sep 17, 2007
11
0
0
You know, I thought Tali's voice actor was very good. I felt the main character was expressing the wrong emotion in his lines, sometimes. That aside, the voice acting really is very well done.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
RevolutionMan said:
You know, I thought Tali's voice actor was very good. I felt the main character was expressing the wrong emotion in his lines, sometimes. That aside, the voice acting really is very well done.
It's hard to tell with Tali's voice actor because more than likely it's been put through a heavy filter, but hey, I seem to like Wrex's voice so what do I know? I think that if you isolate one or two examples from the Shepard's voice it would a tad bit unfair due to the sheer quantity they have to perform. If you perform that much material, you're bound to have a couple of misses.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
JimboG said:
Maybe brevity is the answer. Maybe "paragraphs" is a better one.

Good review, although it was daunting being confronted with a wall of text with no breaks.
Is that how you're seeing it? Odd, looks to me as if there are about 13 paragraphs...is anyone else having this problem with the text?
 

sammyfreak

New member
Dec 5, 2007
1,221
0
0
I dont agree with everything in the review but it was well written, i especially liked the introduction.
 

Hey Joe

New member
Dec 23, 2007
2,025
0
0
Sorry kids,

I needed to bump this to show both Goatzilla and Obliviam that their reviews are both crap, and pulling petty stuff like this is a dick move.

See?
 

PlasticTree

New member
May 17, 2009
523
0
0
You were right by bumping this, it is indeed a much better review. Not that it's perfect: you still mis some important stuff while exagerating other points. For example: you don't say anything about the huge but empty world and the exploring that goes with it, but you do make a big point about those 'tactical' combatorders, while you can simply ignore them. Yet, it does make a fine example of a good review for Goatzilla and Obliviam.

Oh, and excuse me for reviewing an old review, I simply couldn't resist.
 

Anachronism

New member
Apr 9, 2009
1,842
0
0
JimboG said:
Maybe brevity is the answer.
"For brevity is the soul of wit, I shall be brief: he is mad".

Excellent review, I have to say. Although I did spot one little grammatical flaw:
Hey Joe said:
The amount of interesting characters you will meet are staggering
This should be "the number of interesting characters". I'm genuinely sorry for pointing this out, because it was a very good review, and this makes it seem like I'm just looking for things to nitpick, but I have to indulge the inner grammar Nazi.

Anyway, pointless nitpicks that accomplish nothing aside: very good review.