Mass Effect society are a bunch of dicks

Recommended Videos

Johnny Wishbone

New member
Aug 17, 2011
47
0
0
The three main council races (Asari, Salarian, and Turian) placed themselves higher in standing than everyone else and are responsible for the following:

- viewed the Rachini as a threat and used Krogans to wipe them out to near extinction

- then viewed the Krogans as a threat and instituted the genophage to limit their birth rates, putting them on a path to extinction

- turned their back on the Quarians as "punishment" for creating the Geth, thereby forcing the Quarians to wander aimlessly throughout the galaxy and putting them on a path to extinction (spot a pattern yet?)

- begrudgingly accepted Humans as a council race only because they stood up to the Turians in the first contact war and the council was afraid Humanity's military power and numbers could overwhelm them. But they still exhibit racist tendencies towards Humans

- treat other races (Elcar, Hanar, Volus) as second class citizens despite their contributions to the galactic society

- treat Batarians and Vorcha even worse, almost as animals

Tell me again why I'm fighting to save this society from the Reapers? Other than self-preservation (since the Reapers want to destroy all sentient life), it sounds to me like a good reaping is needed.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Johnny Wishbone said:
- viewed the Rachini as a threat and used Krogans to wipe them out to near extinction
They were a threat though. Unquestionably.

The ranchni during the wars were under the influence of reaper indoctrination. The "rotton yellow note". They attacked the council races without pause and ignored any and all attempts at negotiation or communication.

Using the krogan turned out to be a bad idea in hindsight, but it seemed like a good idea at the time and they didn't have many options. Besides, the krogan were happy to help. They jumped at the chance to be big heroes by fighting tough enemies with fancy new toys.

- then viewed the Krogans as a threat and instituted the genophage to limit their birth rates, putting them on a path to extinction
Well, yeah. And the game treats the genophage as a very murky issue.

It's worth noting however that it did not put the krogan on a path to extinction. It ravaged their culture to breaking point, yes, but it was carefully designed to limit their numbers, not wipe them out.

- turned their back on the Quarians as "punishment" for creating the Geth, thereby forcing the Quarians to wander aimlessly throughout the galaxy and putting them on a path to extinction (spot a pattern yet?)
The Quarians brought their own destruction upon themselves. First by building the Geth, and second by provoking them.

Also, the Quarians were in no way on a path to extinction. They have it tough, but they're not about to die out. Their biggest threat is their own leaders picking another fight with the Geth.

- begrudgingly accepted Humans as a council race only because they stood up to the Turians in the first contact war and the council was afraid Humanity's military power and numbers could overwhelm them. But they still exhibit racist tendencies towards Humans
Welcome to politics. Also racism, kinda.

Actually, it's worth noting that humanity gained more power and more influence and a quicker rate than any other species.

- treat other races (Elcar, Hanar, Volus) as second class citizens despite their contributions to the galactic society
No they don't. Those races are treated equally and are allowed to participate in life and business as they please. They just come from civilizations with less power. It's like saying the USA treats New Zealanders as second-class citizens.

The quarians however are treated poorly for no good reason.

- treat Batarians and Vorcha even worse, almost as animals
The Batarians are semi-hostile to the council and rarely seen within council space. They aren't regarded as animals though.

The vorcha are a different story. They are unfairly treated like shit, which is in part invited by their own nature on the biological level. They are too different and inherently violent and short lived, so they have trouble fitting in.
 

JediMB

New member
Oct 25, 2008
3,094
0
0
TopazFusion said:
ME3 SPOILERS FOLLOW
Johnny Wishbone said:
(since the Reapers want to destroy all sentient life)
Not quite true.

If catalyst kid is to be believed, the Reapers want to "preserve" organic life, in the form of new Reapers.
But the kid completely fails to sell us on WHY WE WOULD WANT THAT.
This is also inconsistent with the desires expressed by Sovereign in ME1 and Harbinger in ME2.

Sovereign made it no secret that they despised biological creatures and wanted to wipe them out, whereas Harbinger saw some sort of potential in humans while finding the rest of the galaxy's advanced species to be worthless.
 

Anachronism

New member
Apr 9, 2009
1,842
0
0
From what I remember, I think that's kind of the point. I got the impression that galactic society had been more or less stagnant for quite a while before humans showed up, and that unpredictable element - specifically, Shepard - breathed new life into that civilisation just as it was most needed. It's banging the "humans are special" drum, to be sure, but then Shepard does pretty much save the galaxy by his/herself.

Also, didn't it turn out that the Asari discovered Prothean technology hidden on their homeworld centuries ago and just sat on it rather than using it for something useful? Between that and the moral dubiousness of Illium, I think we were meant to think the Asari in particular had become lazy and corrupt.

The fact that the Council spends most of the trilogy denying the Reapers' existence and contemplating their navels is meant to reinforce how complacent everyone had gotten, and how unprepared they were to fight. That's what I took away from it, anyway.
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,784
0
41
I know isn't it funny how these games just fall apart under the slightest bit of surface level analysis...
 

M0tty

New member
Aug 2, 2008
24
0
0
TopazFusion said:
ME3 SPOILERS FOLLOW
Johnny Wishbone said:
(since the Reapers want to destroy all sentient life)
Not quite true.

If catalyst kid is to be believed, the Reapers want to "preserve" organic life, in the form of new Reapers.
But the kid completely fails to sell us on WHY WE WOULD WANT THAT.
That's not how they mean to preserve organic life. The reapers kill advanced organic life (along with non-reaper synthetics) in order to preserve the concept of organic life. Their belief is that if organic life is left to advance unchecked, it will eventually create synthetic life (such as the geth), which will inevitably go on to kill ALL organic life in the galaxy. The kid doesn't try to sell us on being a reaper because he doesn't care if individuals want to be reapers or not, what the species under threat want doesn't matter. It's not about them, but the existence of organic life as a whole.
 

AntiChri5

New member
Nov 9, 2011
584
0
0
Kalezian said:
Anachronism said:
From what I remember, I think that's kind of the point. I got the impression that galactic society had been more or less stagnant for quite a while before humans showed up, and that unpredictable element - specifically, Shepard - breathed new life into that civilisation just as it was most needed. It's banging the "humans are special" drum, to be sure, but then Shepard does pretty much save the galaxy by his/herself.

Also, didn't it turn out that the Asari discovered Prothean technology hidden on their homeworld centuries ago and just sat on it rather than using it for something useful? Between that and the moral dubiousness of Illium, I think we were meant to think the Asari in particular had become lazy and corrupt.

The fact that the Council spends most of the trilogy denying the Reapers' existence and contemplating their navels is meant to reinforce how complacent everyone had gotten, and how unprepared they were to fight. That's what I took away from it, anyway.
It's hinted at the Asari found the Protean technology and used it to essentially jump their race up a few pegs as well as use it to maintain their "dominance" in the galactic civilization.

You would be right in assuming that Asari were lazy and corrupt. Talking to the Bartender Asari on Illium in ME2, she pretty much says she warned them this would happened, but no one would either listen or help in any way.

The Turians had something sweet to ride on, basically the protectors of the council and were able to have the most ships in the space navy.

That is until they got their shit kicked in by the Humans with inferior numbers, but instead of holding humans to the same regard as Turians, they basically hid behind "well, we were just following orders" and then forced humans to weaken themselves in order to be brought into the galactic community.


Sure, humans in the ME had some bad seeds, but those pale in comparison to the other races. Hell, I might just go make a full renegade racist Shepard just for the hell of it.
I couldn't agree more about the asari, but couldn't disagree more about the turians. The First Contact War was such a clusterfuck that it can't be used to judge who would win between humans and council or just humans and turians.

The war started with the turians completely kicking our ass, hardly surprising since "back then we didn't even know if there was anything to garrison against" as Ash says. Then, in turn, we managed to kick their asses because we were able to actually bring a full military force to bear and the turians had no idea where we came from or how many of us there were. Then, naturally, the turians realize we aren't just a small fly to be swatted casually and decide to bring all their force to the party.

It was at this point that the asari noticed and facepalmed so hard they managed to wake themselves up enough to actually do something. And so diplomacy began.

It isn't accurate to view the FCW as any indicator of proportional military power. It's barely accurate to consider it a war.
 

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
This is how international politics work, friend. The council races are very similar to Europe during colonialism and the the World Wars. There were treaties in place to guarantee certain nations maintained military superiority, or that limited military power. The Turians, for instance, are limited to having a fleet (3?) times largre than the Asari, similar to military treaties created by Europenas.

The Quarians are basically gypsies. A racial group driven from home, marauders, forced to make use of everything they have. As a result they build up a reputation as thieves or con artists, even if it's not really warranted. It doesn't help that the migrant fleet evidently disturbs the economy of whatever sector they're flying through (according to the archives at least). This leads to casual, though not institutionalized, racism.

The genophage is supposed to controversial. The Krogan were used, but then grew to be too powerful. The game basically asks you to decide for yourself whether the ends justify the means.

The Batarians are treated pretty badly by the other races, but it goes both ways. The Batarians torture victims, commit acts of terrorism, and kill innocent people. In the second game you (inadvertently) kill millions of Batarians. It reminds me of a mixture of the cold war and modern terrorism, actually. Is it ethical for terrorists to commit acts of violence against Israeli civilians? No. Is it understandbale? Since Israel booted local ethnic groups out of the country, and commit acts of mass murder against civilians, I would say yes. Both sides commit violence against one another. Is it okay for Iran to support terrorist groups working against the United States? No. But is their hate understandable? Given that the U.S. overthrew their government and replaced with a dictatorship, yes, I think it is.

My point is that there aren't usually pure good guys and bad guys in real life, and the same is true in Mass Effect.
 
Dec 10, 2012
867
0
0
M0tty said:
TopazFusion said:
ME3 SPOILERS FOLLOW
Johnny Wishbone said:
(since the Reapers want to destroy all sentient life)
Not quite true.

If catalyst kid is to be believed, the Reapers want to "preserve" organic life, in the form of new Reapers.
But the kid completely fails to sell us on WHY WE WOULD WANT THAT.
That's not how they mean to preserve organic life. The reapers kill advanced organic life (along with non-reaper synthetics) in order to preserve the concept of organic life. Their belief is that if organic life is left to advance unchecked, it will eventually create synthetic life (such as the geth), which will inevitably go on to kill ALL organic life in the galaxy. The kid doesn't try to sell us on being a reaper because he doesn't care if individuals want to be reapers or not, what the species under threat want doesn't matter. It's not about them, but the existence of organic life as a whole.
You're both right. They preserve individual civilizations as reapers, in order to keep alive the essence of each advanced galactic society. Then they wipe the rest of them off the map to leave room for new civilizations to develop, thus ensuring that synthetic creations do not become powerful enough to kill all organic life for good. So they preserve life both by saving each society as it arises, and on a universal scale by preventing the ultimate destruction of life. That is, in their opinion.

On topic; the three Council Races are just another example of bureaucratic incompetence. They've been in charge long enough that they are primarily concerned with holding on to the power they have, rigidly enforcing their rules and suppressing the things they don't want to hear, hence ignoring Shepard's warnings.

Their solutions to the threats of the rachni and the krogan were extreme, perhaps, but in both cases it was becoming a desperate situation. The rachni were just too dangerous for any of them to withstand, and only the krogan could take the fight to their homeworlds. Once the krogan got a taste of galactic power, they wanted to expand. It was in their very nature; the Council tried to reason with them, but the krogan refused anything less than full capitulation, and so the Krogan Rebellions began.

The krogan, over decades, were unstoppable. With all the weapons and technology the Council had given them, and their incredible birthrate, they were overrunning council space. Fortuitous first contact with the turians slowed the krogan advance, but eventually the weight of krogan numbers would have destroyed the council government. The genophage was literally a last-ditch effort to save themselves from total defeat and either subjugation or extinction. It's hard to argue that it was the wrong thing to do when they were so close to destruction.

All this trouble was kicked off by the reapers when they indoctrinated the rachni queens to attack the rest of the galaxy. So, really, all the council races are guilty of here is reacting to reaper plots.

Humanity holds a unique place in the story; they proved themselves capable and useful immediately after first contact, and they are aggressive in gaining all the influence they can. Remember that the volus have been part of galactic politics for centuries and still aren't a council race; humanity took 30 years. That's an absurdly short time to gain so much influence when you look at the relative age of the council government. Of course the Council is holding us back; otherwise we would have taken over completely already.

Their treatment of the quarians is entirely unfair; they should at least be trying to give the quarians a few worlds to settle on so they can stop being a huge pain in the Council's neck. They really don't like the geth, though, and I think that the asari especially don't see three hundred years of exile as that strict a punishment. To them, three centuries is only about 30 years to us, so I think they want the quarians to really feel the punishment for their mistake.

As for the other races, second-class citizens is way too harsh a term. At worst they are seen as assets to Council politics instead of real groups of people. All that means is that their interests are secondary to the council races', but only in the case of a direct conflict, which rarely happens. The Council government is a cooperative one; even if it gets tense at times, everyone knows that positive relations with the other races is mutually beneficial.

Unless, of course, that race is the batarians. When humanity showed up and the Council gave them special treatment, the batarians threw a fit and severed their own ties with the galactic government. Their predicament is their own fault. They are clearly an adversarial race by nature, and refuse to get along with anyone who doesn't give them everything they want. To be honest, until their government learns to play nice with the other races, they don't belong in council space, and everyone knows it.

Finally, the vorcha are a bit of a special case. They don't fit anywhere in galactic society, they don't offer much or fill a particular niche. They are treated like vermin because they act like vermin because they are are treated like vermin. Really, their predicament is like that of the homeless in the U.S. They are ignored for the most part, put off as often as possible, because there really isn't a good solution to their problems.

Man. I know way too much fake politics. I am such a nerd.
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,099
0
0
So kinda like real life huh. Maybe the mass effect society is a reflection of our own.

Nah who am i kidding. That's way to smart.
 

inzesky

New member
Oct 28, 2009
35
0
0
krazykidd said:
So kinda like real life huh. Maybe the mass effect society is a reflection of our own.

Nah who am i kidding. That's way to smart.
There are genuine parts of the game which ask interesting questions, the problem is they are encapsulated by a sort-of, kind-of plothole-ridden plot from Mass Effect 2 and on.
 

Folksoul

New member
May 15, 2010
306
0
0
To quote Avenue Q, "Everyone's a little bit racist." and if they die so do you.
 

Rabbitboy

New member
Apr 11, 2014
2,966
0
0
Well the Krogans and the rachni were a threat and the quarians brought it al on themselves

And I don't remember they were afraid we were going to overwhelm them

And just because the government consist of nothing but assholes doesn't mean the people they rule deserve to die
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
TopazFusion said:
ME3 SPOILERS FOLLOW
Johnny Wishbone said:
(since the Reapers want to destroy all sentient life)
Not quite true.

If catalyst kid is to be believed, the Reapers want to "preserve" organic life, in the form of new Reapers.
But the kid completely fails to sell us on WHY WE WOULD WANT THAT.
Because Synthetics obviously.

The whole thing was so clear and well-written. How could you not know?
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
inzesky said:
krazykidd said:
So kinda like real life huh. Maybe the mass effect society is a reflection of our own.

Nah who am i kidding. That's way to smart.
There are genuine parts of the game which ask interesting questions, the problem is they are encapsulated by a sort-of, kind-of plothole-ridden plot from Mass Effect 2 and on.
I hear this every now and again and I've always found it an odd opinion considering that the first game's plot was built on a plot hole.

Saren and Sovereign show their hand by attacking Eden Prime, so they can access the Prothean beacon that will let them find the conduit. The conduit turns out to be a back door into the Citadel.

Okey-dokey then. But Saren was the council's top operative, he could have just walked into the Citadel, including the council chambers, at any time and been welcome. Plus Sovereign could solo the Citadel defense fleet, and is seen doing so during the climax.

So they went to all that effort to infiltrate a location that they could have just waltzed into. It's like breaking into your own house while you have the key in your pocket.
 

Vendor-Lazarus

Censored by Mods. PM for Taboos
Mar 1, 2009
1,201
0
0
Johnny Wishbone said:
I'm sorry I don't have anything to contribute to the topic at hand, except to agree in general.

My reason for posting concerns the topic title itself.
I wouldn't have thought it acceptable on Escapist to use such a sexist and derogatory term but I confess that I don't know exactly what would or wouldn't fly.

Perhaps a slight change is in order? Arrogant aliens maybe, or bullies..even over-sitters..something.

I am in no way telling you to do it. Not at all.
If the Escapist team hasn't done anything, and let it stand, I wish you all a good debate on the topic at hand.
Thanks!
 
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
Johnny Wishbone said:
- then viewed the Krogans as a threat and instituted the genophage to limit their birth rates, putting them on a path to extinction
This point isn't true. In fact, it's explicitly explained multiple times. The genophage was not designed to extinguish the Krogan but to control their number. The Krogan bred immensely fast and their sheer numbers, tendency towards violence and the incident of the Krogan Rebellions was enough to convince the council. The explicitly would not "wipe them out" but controlled the birth rates such that only 1/1000 pregnancies would result in live birth.

They would thus never go extinct, just have their numbers reduced over time moving forward. The problem as the Council saw it was that there were always too many Krogan. There was never any risk of extinction.

Lastly, they weren't "viewed as a threat", they were a threat. They decimated the Turians (wiping out around 25% of their species), killed many humans, asaari and salarians as well.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Caramel Frappe said:
The only bone I have to pick is the council. I mean, it's one thing to tolerate politicians because they're usually bad at their jobs if not screwing people over... but by the 2nd game, are you HONESTLY telling me that they refuse to accept the fact this Reaper wasn't a legit thing? The ship itself got the Geth to assault everyone outside their zone including the Citedal. The Reaper was so powerful that mere fleets could not even phase it. So how come they dismissed the fact this Reaper could very well be something more then a "Geth ship?" They also screw you over in the third game by not wanting to help save Earth. They want to secure their own worlds ... that's it. No plan, no teamwork, nothing. If it wasn't for Liara's plan to build the ultimate Reaper killing weapon, the galaxy would of been screwed for sure. So the council is terrible because the main 3 leaders are dumb as bricks. Anderson was the only wise one, but he was human... and you know how we humans like making ourselves look the most 'rightous' ones out of the rest lol.
This is another thing I never got. The council generally seemed pretty sensible to me.

To begin with, you accuse their top operative of a crime based on the testimony of one random farmer. They are skeptical and demand further proof. Seems fair enough to me.

You get proof. They accept it. Udina demands that they send the fleets in. The council are all, "No, we'd really rather not send an entire fleet into Space Somalia and risk starting a war with the Terminus Systems just to hunt down one guy." Once gain, seems fair enough to me.

Instead they grant you specter status and authorize you to hunt Saren's arse down yourself. Still not seeing the problem.

In Mass Effect 2 they don't believe Sovereign was a Reaper. They got attacked by a Geth fleet, a known hostile force, led by a crazy powerful flagship. Which is the more logical conclusion, that the flagship was in fact a sentient construct representative of a species of cosmic death bots out to end all civilization, or that the Geth just managed to build a really powerful ship?

I will concede one thing on this point though. You can tell the Council to ask Vigil, the AI in the Prothean stasis vault on Ilos, about the reapers and everything and they tell you that the AI had decayed by the time they found it. That was awfully contrived. I mean, it stayed functional for tens of thousands of years, only to break down just then? Meh. Thing is, that could have been taken care of with a little forethought in the first game. Just have it say that it's using the last of its energy reserves to tell you what it has to say, then have it "die" at the end of the dialogue. Then it wouldn't seem contrived in the second game. The whole ME series suffered from a lack of overall planning in these sort of things.

Anyway, back to the Council. In ME3 their wanting to see to their own borders seemed pretty understandable to me. Shortsighted, sure, but understandable. Besides, it's not like the humans are much better. "Save Earth! Save Earth! Huh? What's that? Palavan is literally on fire you say? Fuck that, we need your fleets to save Earth!