grammer and philosophy don't mix, nor do pickled fish and cold pizza...CartoonHead said:Looks to me to be the explanation of the question rather that the answer to it BuckminsterF.
"The SUM of the...." If it said "The sum of the...IS:" the words following that would be the answer.
The answer would be off-thread anyway, an opinion or belief is what is sought - and I'm sorry to say it seems your post appears to be neither.
Although I do concede that any one of us may indeed turn into a lump of cheese or die at any minute so agree on the enjoying life now part (only one and a half hours to go until the end of my last night shift, woo-hoo! To the pub I will go this evening).
John Galt said:It's impossible to find one 'meaning of life' due to the fact that life is subjective. Everyone sees things slightly differently and creates rationalizations to explain them. Just look at old scientific theories, the four elements, flat earth, spontaneous generation, all of it made perfect sense at the time, but eventually we were able to perceive things differently and thus find the holes in those theories. The periodic table replaced Earth, Wind, Water, and Fire just as modern biology replaced spontaneous generation to a degree.
Religions are just more rationalizations to help explain things without complete data. "God did it" seems like a perfectly reasonable explanation to someone without any means to perceive natural phenomena through a scientific viewpoint. The same goes for philosophy, each sage claiming to know the truth throughout the centuries. If one of them did know the truth, then why are there things they cannot address or why are there so many truths out there. The thing is, we can't find a meaning of life because our mind isn't equipped with either the biological capacity or the technological ability to comprehend everything.
On my own views of what to do before death, it all pretty much stems from the will to power. I have goals and I want to see them through before I die. Whether this is the product of my own neurological makeup or whether it's the reason anyone does anything (besides for the lulz of course), I don't know because I can't know. I'm not you, you're not me.
From a biological standpoint however, we can see that all life exists to reproduce. That is what all life has in common, even things that aren't alive like viruses and the like apparently exist simply to make more copies of themselves. Thus we have rationalized existence to be for the sole purpose of creating more life, that life for its own sake is the way to go. However, my view is that this would only apply to something without the power of conscious though. As people with the ability to say yes or no to biological imperatives, we generally kick nature in the face and go do whatever tickles our fancy and then justify it with whatever means we have at our disposal.
hardly.. but thats another rant itself.Somethingironic said:blah blah blah .... we think about consequences...... blah some more
The engine? Oh that's simple, the main component is magic. Takes about a dozen or so people standing around thinking really hard about how cool it would be if it worked. Forget all those things I said in my speech about work being a virtue. Who needs labor when you've got magic?Zeddicus Zhul Zorander said:DUDE, IT'S JOHN GALT. Can I have your autograph, Mr. Galt? By the way, I loved your speech. Oh, and what are the specs on that engine that runs entirely off of static electricity gathered from the atmosphere. I think that with the current energy crisis, one of those would be really useful.
Jesus, that's something that has actually kept me up at night... (Quit reading my mind!!!!) lol.Somethingironic said:Say I saw the colour you identify as blue, but to me, and everybody else, that colour is green? I can point at a pair of pink pants and tell you that that colour is pink, and you will agree. But although we both label it as being pink, what if simultaneously we both see a different colour? How would we know?!?!?
He's right. Everyone knows it.smallharmlesskitten said:just gonna put it out there
42!!
i have so many arguments with friends over this, ever since i was 12 ive asked every doctor i have met or even the optometrist i saw when i had my eyes checked.tregon75 said:Jesus, that's something that has actually kept me up at night... (Quit reading my mind!!!!) lol.Somethingironic said:Say I saw the colour you identify as blue, but to me, and everybody else, that colour is green? I can point at a pair of pink pants and tell you that that colour is pink, and you will agree. But although we both label it as being pink, what if simultaneously we both see a different colour? How would we know?!?!?