Meaning of Life

Recommended Videos

Katrex

New member
Jul 9, 2008
7
0
0
Sorry I cant take this topic seriously *Yawn* the answer is -1(Universe + everything)+ 42
 

BuckminsterF

New member
Mar 5, 2008
506
0
0
CartoonHead said:
Looks to me to be the explanation of the question rather that the answer to it BuckminsterF.

"The SUM of the...." If it said "The sum of the...IS:" the words following that would be the answer.

The answer would be off-thread anyway, an opinion or belief is what is sought - and I'm sorry to say it seems your post appears to be neither.

Although I do concede that any one of us may indeed turn into a lump of cheese or die at any minute so agree on the enjoying life now part (only one and a half hours to go until the end of my last night shift, woo-hoo! To the pub I will go this evening).
grammer and philosophy don't mix, nor do pickled fish and cold pizza...
 

Somethingironic

New member
Jul 5, 2008
102
0
0
Ever think that maybe humans have messed up our evolution? Before we had to fight to survive and only the strongest and smartest would live to reproduce, but today.... We work so hard as a race to keep EVERYBODY alive, can't that mix up our genes a fair bit down the line? Over time, couldn't that cause us to lose some of the evolutionary gain we've worked for over the years? Or is doing the "right thing" in working to keep everybody alive the "right thing" to do?

Also, I think there's been several misconceptions about aliens. We think aliens would care about humans enough to make contact, we think aliens would care enough to want our planet, we think that we'd be able to see aliens or to sense them in some way. What if aliens are already there, but our limited ranges of sensory perception doesn't allow us to see them or know that they are there?
 
Dec 29, 2007
44
0
0
John Galt said:
It's impossible to find one 'meaning of life' due to the fact that life is subjective. Everyone sees things slightly differently and creates rationalizations to explain them. Just look at old scientific theories, the four elements, flat earth, spontaneous generation, all of it made perfect sense at the time, but eventually we were able to perceive things differently and thus find the holes in those theories. The periodic table replaced Earth, Wind, Water, and Fire just as modern biology replaced spontaneous generation to a degree.

Religions are just more rationalizations to help explain things without complete data. "God did it" seems like a perfectly reasonable explanation to someone without any means to perceive natural phenomena through a scientific viewpoint. The same goes for philosophy, each sage claiming to know the truth throughout the centuries. If one of them did know the truth, then why are there things they cannot address or why are there so many truths out there. The thing is, we can't find a meaning of life because our mind isn't equipped with either the biological capacity or the technological ability to comprehend everything.

On my own views of what to do before death, it all pretty much stems from the will to power. I have goals and I want to see them through before I die. Whether this is the product of my own neurological makeup or whether it's the reason anyone does anything (besides for the lulz of course), I don't know because I can't know. I'm not you, you're not me.

From a biological standpoint however, we can see that all life exists to reproduce. That is what all life has in common, even things that aren't alive like viruses and the like apparently exist simply to make more copies of themselves. Thus we have rationalized existence to be for the sole purpose of creating more life, that life for its own sake is the way to go. However, my view is that this would only apply to something without the power of conscious though. As people with the ability to say yes or no to biological imperatives, we generally kick nature in the face and go do whatever tickles our fancy and then justify it with whatever means we have at our disposal.



DUDE, IT'S JOHN GALT. Can I have your autograph, Mr. Galt? By the way, I loved your speech. Oh, and what are the specs on that engine that runs entirely off of static electricity gathered from the atmosphere. I think that with the current energy crisis, one of those would be really useful.
 

BrokenWind

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6
0
0
Our evolution has been screwed up, there's no real doubt there. Evolution is based on a species death rate, not birth rate. More accurately, we've *stopped* evolving all together, we did about 10,000 years ago when civilization started. Watch the movie Idiocracy, or at least the first 10 minutes - I think they sum it up pretty well there, even though the movie itself isn't the smartest one in the world.

Actually, it might not be accurate to say that we've stopped evolving, rather that we've basically stopped evolving on a genetic level. Instead, we've started evolving on a memetic level, through the evolution of ideas. This has been especially true in the past century with the invention of cars, and who knows what the internet will do to spur on that evolution in the future?

Signs are really starting to show that the gene pool is stagnating, especially in first world countries like the U.S., but I believe that pretty soon, genetics won't even matter any more. We can eventually overcome all our genetic deficiencies by, well, being smarter. :) Be it genetic manipulation, artificial body parts, robot servants, or some other thing, we will eventually outgrow the need for natural evolution.

I personally can't wait to be a robot.
 

tweaky7

New member
Jul 15, 2008
12
0
0
I think we are here for the mere purpose of excistence. I mean if there is a god (not that i believe there is) he has to do something, right? So he'd wanna watch something happening, thus us. But we are here to mess with eachothers minds and to ultimatley see who is the best at any one given thing. We have sayings like "there will always be someone better than you" but surely someone has to the be 'the best'. and "practise makes perfect" and "no one's perfect" so wha tdoes that tell us? It tells us that we can't do anything without it being contradicted by something else, i believe there is nothing that goes without a contradiction and our purpose is to fix that instead of continuing on with the lie we all live. If we get rid of contradictions, we may be able to make things better for ourselves.
 

Bobkat1252

The Psychotic Psyker
Mar 18, 2008
317
0
0
Life has meaning if you give it meaning, thats what makes it great, Life is whatever you make of it.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
Wow, we actually went and put the ultimate question up for debate here. Its the internet, debate is inevitable

I've certainly learned something from this thread, and i have read not one post.
 

apmpnmdslkbk

New member
Jun 30, 2008
360
0
0
Hmm well I whink I know the meaning of life.

Life: the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally.

There
 

John Galt

New member
Dec 29, 2007
1,345
0
0
Zeddicus Zhul Zorander said:
DUDE, IT'S JOHN GALT. Can I have your autograph, Mr. Galt? By the way, I loved your speech. Oh, and what are the specs on that engine that runs entirely off of static electricity gathered from the atmosphere. I think that with the current energy crisis, one of those would be really useful.
The engine? Oh that's simple, the main component is magic. Takes about a dozen or so people standing around thinking really hard about how cool it would be if it worked. Forget all those things I said in my speech about work being a virtue. Who needs labor when you've got magic?
 

Johnn Johnston

New member
May 4, 2008
2,519
0
0
Four....teee...tooo...

I think we are here for no reason except to simply exist. We exist for no real reason. Think about that...
 

tregon75

New member
Jun 27, 2008
99
0
0
Somethingironic said:
Say I saw the colour you identify as blue, but to me, and everybody else, that colour is green? I can point at a pair of pink pants and tell you that that colour is pink, and you will agree. But although we both label it as being pink, what if simultaneously we both see a different colour? How would we know?!?!?
Jesus, that's something that has actually kept me up at night... (Quit reading my mind!!!!) lol.

smallharmlesskitten said:
just gonna put it out there

42!!
He's right. Everyone knows it.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
tregon75 said:
Somethingironic said:
Say I saw the colour you identify as blue, but to me, and everybody else, that colour is green? I can point at a pair of pink pants and tell you that that colour is pink, and you will agree. But although we both label it as being pink, what if simultaneously we both see a different colour? How would we know?!?!?
Jesus, that's something that has actually kept me up at night... (Quit reading my mind!!!!) lol.
i have so many arguments with friends over this, ever since i was 12 ive asked every doctor i have met or even the optometrist i saw when i had my eyes checked.

None of them could answer... and it plagues me still.