The thing is though that more men are attacking other men as well than are attacking women. Men are attacking BOTH other males and females far more than women attack anyone. Men are more likely to be murdered by other MEN. Men are committing 90% of all homicides. Females were most likely to be victims of domestic homicides (63.7%) and sex-related homicides (81.7%)UberPubert said:This... Is actually a pretty apt statement. Basically anything that's perceived as sexist is - I'm told - a result of patriarchy (and hence, misogyny).WeepingAngels said:I don't know what to say to this. You are taking the apathy of violence against men and calling it misogyny. I guess anything can be twisted to become misogyny.
And it's actually gotten me thinking: In the pursuit to bring aid and raise awareness of female victims of abuse in ways disproportionate to men, is feminism/are feminists actually reinforcing gender stereotypes?
While I've heard others refer to domestic and sexual abuse towards women as an "epidemic" among men as aggressive and violent, I'd imagine it'd actually be quite difficult for someone to be told the statistics and then shown the amount of money going into women's aid and shelters and not also come to conclusion that vulnerability and neediness are common traits among women.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime
The idea that " vulnerability and neediness are common traits among women" is an incorrect conclusion to draw, rather than men need to learn to be less violent against other males and females. Women often refrain from fighting back. The reason more funding is allocated to women's resources is because more women volunteer and create charities for women to provide those resources. More women being victims of sexual attacks and serious injury or death in domestic violence also requires more resources to be allocated to women's resources for domestic and sexual abuse, however overall more men kill other men than they kill women.
"Males were more likely to be murder victims (76.8%)" By your logic then would that mean that "vulnerability and extreme violence are common traits among men"?