In all fairness, Kyuubey is a lot more charismatic than Microsoft despite not even being a human.Objectable said:![]()
That's right gamers! I'm trustworthy!
You should make a contract with me, to get a brand new game system!
All it takes is a wish!
In all fairness, Kyuubey is a lot more charismatic than Microsoft despite not even being a human.Objectable said:![]()
That's right gamers! I'm trustworthy!
You should make a contract with me, to get a brand new game system!
All it takes is a wish!
My favorite one is that NASA spent millions trying to get a pen that would write while in space for their astronauts. Russia's answer? Send their cosmonauts up with pencils.Zachary Amaranth said:It's funny, because I remember my electronics instructor talking about several other instances in which Russia's solution to high tech issues was to go low tech.Neronium said:It's actually because of all of these leaks that Russia actually started using typewriters again when recording down stuff. Sure the paperwork can be messy and cluttered, but you can't exactly leak it onto the internet and get away with it as easily.![]()
I mean, everyone sort of snickered but....It's not necessarily a bad idea.
That's not actually true - BOTH space programs used pencils initially, and then switched to special space-pens (in the case of NASA) and ordinary ball-points (in the case of whatever russia's space agency was called). They switched from pencils because trying to sharpen them with the little bits of wood floating off and getting stuck in things, plus the carbon in the pencil lead is conductive so you certainly don't want it anywhere near a control panel....Zipa said:My favorite one is that NASA spent millions trying to get a pen that would write while in space for their astronauts. Russia's answer? Send their cosmonauts up with pencils.Zachary Amaranth said:It's funny, because I remember my electronics instructor talking about several other instances in which Russia's solution to high tech issues was to go low tech.Neronium said:It's actually because of all of these leaks that Russia actually started using typewriters again when recording down stuff. Sure the paperwork can be messy and cluttered, but you can't exactly leak it onto the internet and get away with it as easily.![]()
I mean, everyone sort of snickered but....It's not necessarily a bad idea.
Cool, the more you know I guess. I just assumed that they would use a new pencil instead of sharpening them because of the floating issue.nickpy said:That's not actually true - BOTH space programs used pencils initially, and then switched to special space-pens (in the case of NASA) and ordinary ball-points (in the case of whatever russia's space agency was called). They switched from pencils because trying to sharpen them with the little bits of wood floating off and getting stuck in things, plus the carbon in the pencil lead is conductive so you certainly don't want it anywhere near a control panel....Zipa said:My favorite one is that NASA spent millions trying to get a pen that would write while in space for their astronauts. Russia's answer? Send their cosmonauts up with pencils.Zachary Amaranth said:It's funny, because I remember my electronics instructor talking about several other instances in which Russia's solution to high tech issues was to go low tech.Neronium said:It's actually because of all of these leaks that Russia actually started using typewriters again when recording down stuff. Sure the paperwork can be messy and cluttered, but you can't exactly leak it onto the internet and get away with it as easily.![]()
I mean, everyone sort of snickered but....It's not necessarily a bad idea.
Yes, basically, pencils are actually a terrible idea in space. The real stupidity of NASA is that they developed special space-pens that were pressurised and so on in order to work correctly in space, entirely unnecessarily... normal ball-points actually work better in space than on earth in that they work any way up in space.
Then you'd need an inordinate quantity of pencils, and cost was measured in millions of dollars per kilo. Plus, even if you never sharpen them, the leads can and do break off accidentally, which brings us back to the conductive material floating + electrical control panel scenario.Zipa said:Cool, the more you know I guess. I just assumed that they would use a new pencil instead of sharpening them because of the floating issue.nickpy said:That's not actually true - BOTH space programs used pencils initially, and then switched to special space-pens (in the case of NASA) and ordinary ball-points (in the case of whatever russia's space agency was called). They switched from pencils because trying to sharpen them with the little bits of wood floating off and getting stuck in things, plus the carbon in the pencil lead is conductive so you certainly don't want it anywhere near a control panel....Zipa said:My favorite one is that NASA spent millions trying to get a pen that would write while in space for their astronauts. Russia's answer? Send their cosmonauts up with pencils.Zachary Amaranth said:It's funny, because I remember my electronics instructor talking about several other instances in which Russia's solution to high tech issues was to go low tech.Neronium said:It's actually because of all of these leaks that Russia actually started using typewriters again when recording down stuff. Sure the paperwork can be messy and cluttered, but you can't exactly leak it onto the internet and get away with it as easily.![]()
I mean, everyone sort of snickered but....It's not necessarily a bad idea.
Yes, basically, pencils are actually a terrible idea in space. The real stupidity of NASA is that they developed special space-pens that were pressurised and so on in order to work correctly in space, entirely unnecessarily... normal ball-points actually work better in space than on earth in that they work any way up in space.
Same argument can be made about every laptop that has integrated camera, which is every laptop. And then we can extend it to phones (mine has two cameras front and back, though the front one i never use).Fox12 said:The mere fact that this power exists means that someone WILL abuse it eventually, in some capacity, somewhere. And if the government did use connect to spy on people, and I'm sure they'd love to, I doubt we'd know about it until it was too late. I find the mere fact that we have to have this discussion disturbing.
As long as the camera can be turned off I can see major problems being avoided, but the idea that the federal government can spy on people in any capacity is disturbing.
advertisement on XBL has been a very nice revenue stream for them, so dont put that behind them.RandV80 said:Really the only positive thing you can say about Microsoft here is that unlike Google ad-revenue isn't their main source of income. They're still a big corporation though and revenue is profits for the shareholders, that's the only thing you can count on really.
Both of which have been hacked in the past. Phones can be used to spy on their owner, and can also be used to listen in on their owner unawares. What I'm saying is that I'm against the use of modern conveniences to spy on their owners, especially i a day and age when the government doesn't need any over site. Hacker groups have also proven themselves up to the task. Just because other devices are in the wrong doesn't mean the Xbox is excused. They're all in the wrong.Strazdas said:Same argument can be made about every laptop that has integrated camera, which is every laptop. And then we can extend it to phones (mine has two cameras front and back, though the front one i never use).Fox12 said:The mere fact that this power exists means that someone WILL abuse it eventually, in some capacity, somewhere. And if the government did use connect to spy on people, and I'm sure they'd love to, I doubt we'd know about it until it was too late. I find the mere fact that we have to have this discussion disturbing.
As long as the camera can be turned off I can see major problems being avoided, but the idea that the federal government can spy on people in any capacity is disturbing.
Yeah, the point was is that your still going to be using such devices. Kinect is not magically much worse just because it can be hacked into because every device now can. i agree that it is bad that they get hacked into it but that does not mean we should remove cameras and microphones from them. in fact that would kinda make phones pointless as you couldnt talk to others.Fox12 said:Both of which have been hacked in the past. Phones can be used to spy on their owner, and can also be used to listen in on their owner unawares. What I'm saying is that I'm against the use of modern conveniences to spy on their owners, especially i a day and age when the government doesn't need any over site. Hacker groups have also proven themselves up to the task. Just because other devices are in the wrong doesn't mean the Xbox is excused. They're all in the wrong.
But all that aside, we all know they'd love to use the device for ad purposes.
*puts on tinfoil hat*