In french when you negate something you say not twice like "billy not do not". The two words are different "ne" and "pas", but mean the same thing. The pas used to actually mean foot, but to embellish a negation people would add the word foot (things lik "i would not move a foot") and eventually it became a necessary and fundamental part of the language to the point that if you have to choose between dropping ne (not) or pas (foot) its better to drop ne and just say "billy do foot". It always makes me giggle when i think about that
Though the only thing that actually annoys/irritates me are people who say other people are stupid because of their language. Saying France french is real french and quebecois is a filthy disease ridden offshot is fine and dandy, but when you say someone who speaks Parisien is smarter than a Qubecois (or any other dialect/pigeon driven conflict) you can go fuck yourself with something sharp and spiky.
RonHiler said:
You know the one that gets on my nerves? "A lot". I don't know why, but it just makes me cringe when people write "alot". THERE IS NO SUCH WORD AS ALOT. Seriously, it's four letters, how do you misspell that? I've also seen people use "allot" when they mean "a lot", which is not quite as bad (at least it is an actual word, even if it's not the one they want).
Whenever anyone puts the word alot into one of their posts (and this covers what seems like about 85% of internet posters), it's a red flag to me that I can safely ignore the rest of whatever they are saying. If you're not intelligent enough to correctly spell a one and three letter word, there is very little chance anything you are saying is worth my reading time. Generally, whenever I see alot in a post, I immediately stop reading and move down to the next poster.
yah see, shit like this
I fluently speak 3 languages, am learning a 4th (in September a 5th), am undoubtedly more linguistically competent and better at English than you can ever hope to be in your lifetime. I use the word alot.
People who judge the vehicle of communication and not the concepts being communicated are goddamn elitist morons. They're usually uni-lingual, always think whatever version of a language they were taught is far superior to any other, always criticise spoken language, and rarely have any actual formal language training. Preferring instead to assume that what they do is right and therefore anyone fails to emulate them is wrong.