Modern Warfare 3 gameplay - Anything new?

[ReaperzXIII]

My point was that if something is deeper than another thing then the other thing is shallow in comparison, people were making the point that CoD is shallow, you disagreed saying CoD can't be shallow unless those games that are deeper are also shallow. I disagreed with the logic of that statement

Good, because that statement has nothing to do with what I was actually saying.

Read again, would ya? If you were, perhaps, to see that I was not making a point but a counterpoint to somebody (not that it was easy to notice the quote, mind you, so it's all good), i.e. I was not actually disproving CoD being shallow but arguing that it being less deep than certain other games is in no way proof of it being shallow. But, alas.

So, yeah, I stand by the train wreck thing.

If you read what I said after then CoD is either shallow or shallow in comparison thus they are not wrong in calling it shallow, so stop saying I cant read when you obviously skip over the things I type.

Ok fine it has nothing to do with what you are actually saying but I was arguing with the logic since the beginning not your actual point.

 

[yuval152]

The Call of Duty series is pretty much superior in every form to every other FPS, and infact any other genre game. Anyone who can't see that needs to open their eyes.

LMFAO!

Let's have a look shall we.


A game that shows no significant gameplay advances since MW1. 4 years later.


MW3's big competitor. Just look at the difference in gameplay, graphics, voice acting, effects, immersion, animation, destruction and it's ability to have large scale events happen without scripting.

This is a game for 2011. MW3 is no different from a game that came out in 2009.

Rage, http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/trailers/3794-Rage-Making-of-Enemies

Just look at the level of detail the enemy characters AI and individual reactionary scripting. The enemy sets into an animation that differs depending on where you shoot them and whether or not they have friends near by.

That's going to freaking add to the immersion soooo much. And just look at how beautiful it looks and how heavy and real the guns feel.

Look up the gameplay of Metro 2033.

Look up a game called Stalker. The sheer depth of that games quality more than made up for it's poor graphics.

Literally, I could go on all day here.

I don't even particularly dislike CoD. But saying what you just said then. It shows a great amount of ignorance on the subject.

Right after watching both of them videos both of which I havent seen before I have to ask what are you on and where can i get some

First game play both the videos where identical the play had a gun and shot people (yes i know battlefeild had tanks but thay where not included)

Graphics: again identical (may be diffrent on pc but not hear)

Voice acting: again identical (no argument)

Effects: where more or less the ssame with battlefield being slighly ahead

Immersion: again both looked more or less the same

I wanna use facepalm so badly but they will call me a fanboy

 

[caz105]

Snip

I presume from your post the only reason you're in this thread is to complain about the game. Obviously it's going to be similar to 1 & 2 because its made by the same company and the other games sold well, but still wait for the game to actually come out to judge it fully, the campaign may well be different to what you expect. It probably wont be but at least give it a chance.

How in my post have I said just buy it? You can if you want but I'll be waiting for my friends to get it first .

 

[Kahunaburger]

If I where to came to this thread and said: STALKER is the best FPS and superior to everything else. No one would say anything.

Yeah, because STALKER is actually good.

Purely subjective.

Well, considering that an objective assessment of an FPS game is "this is a game where you move through a virtual world through use of the mouse and the w, a, s, and d keys. Other keys have different functions." the whole "subjective" thing doesn't actually mean anything.

 

[vermin_]

Modern Warfare is the lepper of the FPS genre. It makes the genre stagnate, it makes it look ugly, and non-evolving.

Ow and yes, im such a hipster becouse i dont like MW, and i also hate popular games. Well sorry, im guesing Minecraft is popular? So are Bioware games? Or Valve games? Hate to break it to You, but I like them.

I dont like "popular" and "mainstream". I hate series that don't evolve, give you the same shit over and over and over again, charging 15 EU for 5 maps. Ow, also i dont like bad games/series. MW is a bad series. And yes, i prefer CSS or Battlefield multiplayer wise. U mad?

 

[DaHero]

snip

It's ironic, you slash him for his opinion but basically say: Oh if you thought these where, that's fine.

If I where to came to this thread and said: STALKER is the best FPS and superior to everything else. No one would say anything.

Probably because you'd be right...it's hard to argue the truth.

MW3 is a modern military glitch based multiplayer biased ego-fest developed for the teens who need to release some tension and can't do it by playing Battletoads.


MW2 was a modern military glitch based multiplayer biased ego-fest developed for the teens who need to release some tension and can't do it by playing Mega Man.

There's your difference.

 

[Tsaba]

DLC?! Nothing new?!

How can you say that, there are TWO scopes!!!
Seriously, what other FPS has two scopes?

ARMA 2 OA

Ace mods.

You asked.

 

[Wushu Panda]

Is anyone even surprised? I knew CoD was going down hill when they used MW1 maps as DLC for MW2. BlackOps was very similar sure, but at least they changed a bunch of stuff around to make it seem like they were progressing towards a more evolved formula. But it seems from MW2 on they're just copy/pasting the game and making minimal changes.

 

[kidd25]

This is like saying that Fallout: NV is just like Fallout 3 because they look the same.

The game's not even out yet, why not save time and energy from getting frustrated at something that you haven't experienced yet? There really are better things to talk about rather than this flame bait nonsense.

dude are you a mindreader? i was thinking the same thing... are you a a jedi?

*waves hand*

You will transfer all of your money to my account in the next 24 hours.

sorry, i'm using anti mind reader glasses, i kinda figured this might happen.

 

[kidd25]

This is like saying that Fallout: NV is just like Fallout 3 because they look the same.

dude are you a mindreader? i was thinking the same thing... are you a a jedi?

*waves hand*

You will transfer all of your money to my account in the next 24 hours.

sorry, i'm using anti mind reader glasses, i kinda figured this might happen.

Curses! It figures that you'd be wearing them now, when I finally decide to put my powers to use.

wait if i knew you would that then... i'm i a mind reader!?!

 

[Leole]

The only thing I have against CoD is that they release games with little differences between them in a short period of time.

It's like they're actually yelling "THIS IS A MASSIVE CASH GRAB STUNT, PLEASE BUY OUR GAMES"

The games are above average, let's be honest, but fuck, a new game every other year? For 60$? No way in HELL I'm getting that.

Maybe if they had a dev. cycle of more than a year and a half to make a solid game, I wouldn't be so skeptic about them.

 

[F4LL3N]

The Call of Duty series is pretty much superior in every form to every other FPS, and infact any other genre game. Anyone who can't see that needs to open their eyes.

snip-

MW3's big competitor. Just look at the difference in gameplay, graphics, voice acting, effects, immersion, animation, destruction and it's ability to have large scale events happen without scripting.

This is a game for 2011. MW3 is no different from a game that came out in 2009.

Rage, http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/trailers/3794-Rage-Making-of-Enemies

Just look at the level of detail the enemy characters AI and individual reactionary scripting. The enemy sets into an animation that differs depending on where you shoot them and whether or not they have friends near by.

That's going to freaking add to the immersion soooo much. And just look at how beautiful it looks and how heavy and real the guns feel.

Look up the gameplay of Metro 2033.

Look up a game called Stalker. The sheer depth of that games quality more than made up for it's poor graphics.

Literally, I could go on all day here.

I don't even particularly dislike CoD. But saying what you just said then. It shows a great amount of ignorance on the subject.

You may be right. Then again, I've read this entire topic and I've yet to see one valid thing against Call of Duty. Everything that's been said is either completely false, or can be said about nearly every other video game ever made.

The person who compared the trailers of Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3 was pretty much correct. Yet there's still people face palming. I'll admit, that Battlfield 3 trailer is WAY, WAY better than the Call of Duty one. The sniper part looked smitten, the explosions, and the general immersion looked great. I loved that trailer so much, it's put Battlefield 3 on my list. But the Modern Warfare 3 one is fairly the same, on a technical standpoint. They both have good voice acting, graphics and animation, effects, etc. You could edit bits and pieces of each one and most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

If I want to play CoD single player, I'd go play CoD4 again and just imagine if Michael Bay had produced it. That's essentially what CoD single player has become: a shitty mindless Michael Bay movie.

I like Michael Bay movies. Judging from the list of movies I've just seen, his made some of my favorites. Transformers 1+2 (haven't seen 3 yet), Bad Boys 1+2, Armageddon, Pearl Harbor, Coyote Ugly. Yeah, I love all of those movies. He's a great director, so I don't know what you're talking about. They're far from shitty mindless movies.

 

[Joey Wonton]

So, which side is the hipster side to be on?

Because CoD is Oh so popular. But All you guys hate it.

How can I be hip if both sides are popular?!

Oh wait, I just love playing CoD. And Winning. And single handed Genocide. And playing with friends. And Point Of View experiences. And the satisfaction from blood. And Ponies.

 

[Jezzascmezza]

I definitely enjoyed MW2, but disliked Black Ops.
And from what I can tell from this gameplay, MW3 looks FAR too much like MW2, which is a game I've already played.
So I'm probably going to pass on MW3, even though every person I know is going to buy it.

 

[pspman45]

I have to admit, MW3 is going to be a rent/borrow for me
I just play them for the singleplayer content. The modern warfare franchise is good at delivering fast paced action with outstanding visuals, along with a somewhat relevant plot to keep things interesting.
the Treyarch made ones failed that, as they just sucked. Its difficult to describe, but they never gave the same "wow" factor that MW1 and its successor were capable of.

and because the multiplayer for COD is crap
and so is every shooter multiplayer.

League of Legends <3