Once I got past all of the commentary concerning how pleased everyone was with themselves, this article tweaked one particular nerve of mine:
"to quote one caustic-tongued Brit-turned-Aussie, is all about giving the player "motherf***ing CHOICE!" in his games - and while said choices do usually boil down to the extremes of Mother Teresa vs Sauron, they're still choices."
I have a near photographic memory, so when someone proposes that they are citing someone, I very much appreciate the author having the decency to say who they are citing (Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw) and that they be so kind as to remain true to the content of the citation.
This segment of the article allows for two interpretations
-The author only took the words "Motherfucking CHOICE!" (missing two exclamation points) from Yahtzee's "Fable: The Lost Chapters (Fullyramblomatic review)," thereafter, defying all of the context built upon by Mr. Crochaw, and continuing on with their OWN interpretation of the moral choice system being polarized...
or...
-The author could not be so kind as to accurately quote the before "unnamed" critic by using the comparison of Mother Teresa to Sauron as opposed to "baby-eating," as shown in his Bioshock review concerning the topic of moral choice systems, specifically.
There is a slight irony in quoting so passively a person who so vehemently decries the crimes committed by moral choice systems, suggesting they should "drink paint and retard themselves out of existence," as stated in his 'Infamous' review. I am further tweaked in noting that Yahtzee, to my recollection, never once has said "Motherfucking CHOICE!!!" but instead included it twice in his Fable: The lost chapters review as part of his characteristic 'subtext' as shown on the background.
This article was short, cute, and well-intended. It was also badly constructed, "cutesy," and poorly researched giving me the feeling that the author came to the conclusion that including a well known critic in their insipid article somehow added credence to their talking points.
"to quote one caustic-tongued Brit-turned-Aussie, is all about giving the player "motherf***ing CHOICE!" in his games - and while said choices do usually boil down to the extremes of Mother Teresa vs Sauron, they're still choices."
I have a near photographic memory, so when someone proposes that they are citing someone, I very much appreciate the author having the decency to say who they are citing (Ben "Yahtzee" Croshaw) and that they be so kind as to remain true to the content of the citation.
This segment of the article allows for two interpretations
-The author only took the words "Motherfucking CHOICE!" (missing two exclamation points) from Yahtzee's "Fable: The Lost Chapters (Fullyramblomatic review)," thereafter, defying all of the context built upon by Mr. Crochaw, and continuing on with their OWN interpretation of the moral choice system being polarized...
or...
-The author could not be so kind as to accurately quote the before "unnamed" critic by using the comparison of Mother Teresa to Sauron as opposed to "baby-eating," as shown in his Bioshock review concerning the topic of moral choice systems, specifically.
There is a slight irony in quoting so passively a person who so vehemently decries the crimes committed by moral choice systems, suggesting they should "drink paint and retard themselves out of existence," as stated in his 'Infamous' review. I am further tweaked in noting that Yahtzee, to my recollection, never once has said "Motherfucking CHOICE!!!" but instead included it twice in his Fable: The lost chapters review as part of his characteristic 'subtext' as shown on the background.
This article was short, cute, and well-intended. It was also badly constructed, "cutesy," and poorly researched giving me the feeling that the author came to the conclusion that including a well known critic in their insipid article somehow added credence to their talking points.