Moral Choice: What would you be?
- Thread starter Instant K4rma
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Full good.
Seriously, I hesitate too much if I want to do bad, and in real life I am walked all over but nice, so Full good.
Seriously, I hesitate too much if I want to do bad, and in real life I am walked all over but nice, so Full good.
I'd be more of on the "asshole" side. Considering the fact that I usually get pissed off most of the time, and generally go on a destructive rampage, and my constant "experiments" in game.
Guessing that'd be Chaotic Neutral?
EDIT: Ohhh... I am dumb..
Okay, probably Chaotic Good, or neutral. I try to be as nice and helpful as I possibly can be, but most of the time, the "man" don't agree with me.
Guessing that'd be Chaotic Neutral?
EDIT: Ohhh... I am dumb..
Okay, probably Chaotic Good, or neutral. I try to be as nice and helpful as I possibly can be, but most of the time, the "man" don't agree with me.
Either Good or Neutral depending on viewpoint. I'm normally a very "good" person, however I follow my own beliefs and ideals which may not be what some people consider "good". My own moral compass is the only thing that influences my decisions and I can be rather extreme when dealing with anyone who would try to harm me or anyone I care about.
Well it's rather hard to get an objective evaluation of one's actions, and there remains the question of do ends and/or the intentions justify the means - that is, if you did something "bad" but something good came out of it, or if you meant good things to come out of it, is that good or bad?
Personally I'd be Chaotic Neutral like every teenager who isn't a complete bastard and doesn't have their head stuck up their proverbials.
Personally I'd be Chaotic Neutral like every teenager who isn't a complete bastard and doesn't have their head stuck up their proverbials.
Games like this lead me to always play through at least twice. First doing whichever route seems more fun, then the opposite, then if it's a good game perhaps doing a play through making choices more akin to what I feel I would actually choose in the situation presented to me.
Mostly neutral. I don't steal, kill, or cheat. But I often lie, can occasionally be quite rude and mean.
I guess I'd be the good guy. Thing is, I'm extremely quiet and don't do stuff at all but do my best to do so, so I'd be a few steps up from neutral.
Always chaotic neutral. I decide what I like, what I want, and what lengths I go to to get those things, and nobody will ever be able to control me.
If only.
If only.
Lawful evil, I will kill people out of retribution but mantain a righteous aura around my tiny NPC fellas.
My alignment is Chaotic Good. I'll admit that i don't purposefully volunteer for charities because i'm lazy, and i may be extremely rude sometimes - but in the end, i'm still a good person. I have moral code, and an idealistic worldview.
If actual "moral choices" came up in real life, i'd most likely take a good option 90% of the time. Not because it gives me more rewards or something like that, but because it feels right.
If actual "moral choices" came up in real life, i'd most likely take a good option 90% of the time. Not because it gives me more rewards or something like that, but because it feels right.
We all got that. Because we are all major nerds.Akalistos said:
If we're going with D&D alignment, you know back when that still existed, I'd have to say I'm either true neutral or chaotic neutral. I don't go to extremes, I have my own rules that I mostly follow, but they're not always the same as everyone else, and I bend them when it suits me.
For something more like Fallout karma, I'd probably be neutral by virtue of doing relatively equal amounts of minor good and minor evil, while mostly staying out of the big things. Occasionally I'll do some moderate good, but I rarely go further than minor evil. Not because I have some moral objection to being a bastard, but because the consequences of doing so are almost always more trouble than they're worth. It is karma, after all. You reap what you sow.
For something more like Fallout karma, I'd probably be neutral by virtue of doing relatively equal amounts of minor good and minor evil, while mostly staying out of the big things. Occasionally I'll do some moderate good, but I rarely go further than minor evil. Not because I have some moral objection to being a bastard, but because the consequences of doing so are almost always more trouble than they're worth. It is karma, after all. You reap what you sow.