Moral Question for you

Recommended Videos

Seekster

New member
May 28, 2008
319
0
0
I would say Los Angeles, CA but since my sister currently lives there, thus being the only redeeming thing about that festering stain on the planet. So my second choice would probably be Lisbon, Portugal. I have nothing against the Portuguese but nuking Portugal is the last thing anyone would ever expect. Granted this would be my decision process with or without terrorists involved as the terrorist would still probably kill me and if they ever got their hands on a nuclear device would likely not put it in the hands of a hostage.
 

Giest4life

The Saucepan Man
Feb 13, 2010
1,554
0
0
I'd take the bullet I guess. Since I don't really believe in an after-life, I won't really care if they kill my family after I'm dead.

I won't mind dropping it on NYC, though. What a shitty place.
 

camokkid

New member
Aug 13, 2009
1,268
0
0
Zeithri said:
camokkid said:
Zeithri said:
camokkid said:
Zeithri said:
camokkid said:
Zeithri said:
Sweden, Sunne.
Shitty little hole anyway.

But more importantly,
No one orders me around.
No one.
Does it take two people to order you around?
No one
Neither knife, gun nor man can order me around.
So, that's a yes?
No one implies everyone, not "1" nor "2", but everyone.
I can order you around, watch:

Make my dinner, pick up my dry cleaning, give me a foot rub, and choose a city to nuke.

Anyone can order you around, that doesn't mean they are making you do it.

there is this thing called free will.

The only way they can [b/]make[/b] you do something is with mind control.

Or if you were a marionette.
No, you cannot order me around.
Because ordering around implies the subject doing said order.

Stop trying to make a pigeon out of a carrot.
What?

I don't want a carrot

How about some broccoli?

With some ranch dressing.

Mmmmmmm.....

Where was I going with this?
 

Emissary Laito

New member
Jun 15, 2010
167
0
0
I would struggle to answer that in reality. My death doesn't phase me that much, but I care very much about my family, and would not want them to die.

However, I have no intention of nuking anywhere. I'm set against that, and would never be able to do it, even if I have this [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tuy4Bpz080Q] on a playlist of mine. ;-)

I'd take the bullet.

On a side note, people do still live at Chernobyl actually. You'd still be killing people if you nuked that place.

EDIT: I wonder if Atlantis counts as a city...
 

Naheal

New member
Sep 6, 2009
3,375
0
0
Julianking93 said:
Let them nuke the Marshall Islands.

The US has already nuked them 67 times.
By that logic, you could drop one on Hiroshima or Nagasaki

Sturmdolch said:
TheNumber1Zero said:
So of course I will point out a city, maybe somewhere in Switzerland.

*Googles*

St. Gallen will do.
>=O Hey! Just for that, I'm nuking a random city in the US. Let's see... Tucson it is!
It's in AZ. Noone here cares about that state

OT: I'd give 'em a choice between 3 cities: Mecca, Jerusalem, and Moscow. Holy city, holy city, or MAD. Good luck.
 

thahat

New member
Apr 23, 2008
973
0
0
its a hate beard nuke made out of ductape semtex and george bush's filled diaper.
so it would be powerfull enough to take out a major city, HELOOOO Amsterdam ( in the Netherlands, capital city ) would make the netherlands so much more... well, just more. XD
*try to miss the harbours and such, can it just be a dirty bomb and just kill the people there? i like architecture. )
 

person427

New member
May 28, 2009
538
0
0
Naheal said:
OT: I'd give 'em a choice between 3 cities: Mecca, Jerusalem, and Moscow. Holy city, holy city, or MAD. Good luck.
He never specified what religion these terrorists are or where they are from. If they ended up being Pastafarians from New Zealand, or any other combination like that, they wouldn't care at all.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
I'd take the bullet, but if I had to choose, I'd say the Gobi desert. Several countries(take a guess) used to use it for target practice with nukes anyways, so who cares?
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
Sooooo... nobody has said Pyongyang yet? Seriously, nuke the loony before he nukes us. He's the only world leader with nuclear weapons who's crazy enough to actually use them, after all...
 

lee1287

New member
Apr 7, 2009
1,495
0
0
my moral compass is so fucked up right now i don't know.

Johhanesburg. after the world cup.
 

The Austin

New member
Jul 20, 2009
3,368
0
0
I would nuke the general vicinity of the Afghan mountains.
Take that Osama!

Either that or I would nuke our location. That way no one else ends up in my situation.
 

Chamale

New member
Sep 9, 2009
1,345
0
0
Good Grief, Canada. Population: 1. That one life than the lives of my entire family, and if they force me to choose a populated city, that's the one.

If I can nuke an empty city, though, I'd go for a ghost town somewhere far from populated areas. Prypriat would be another good choice, because it's completely depopulated now.

Presumably, hitting any nuclear power, such as the U.S., Russia, China, Israel, India, or Pakistan, would be likely to start a nuclear war. So while it might be useful to try to kill Kim Jong-Il, I'd rather not take that risk.