FalloutForever said:
[cluster of bewildered justifying edits]
Sorry, man. The term 'RPG' is about as vague as you can get, and most people taking issue with your idea of Morrowind holding any sort of glory in that field are less hacked off about your opinion and more hacked off that you weren't talking specifically about their
kind of RPG.
Let me take a moment to say something that will elicit a long, puzzled blink from a few readers: the 'RPG' genre is a colossal putrid tumor, pulsating on the gut of gaming culture. Let me elicit another long slow blink by saying RPG's of all stripes are about my favorite games out there, and always have been.
See, the 'RPG' clot is exactly like a tumor: it should have split years and years ago into smaller sections, and then split again, and then maybe once again for good measure. There are probably anywhere from four to eight kinds of RPG's in video gaming that could easily be considered their own genre. Is Diablo in the same genre as Final Fantasy? Are either in the same genre as the Elder Scrolls? Are any of them in the same genre as Zelda? No on all counts, but if you claim that any of them wasn't or isn't an RPG you will instantly invite the scorn of one sect while simultaneously drawing the admiration of another for telling it like it is.
As things stand, RPG's, like a tumorous mass, grow ever larger and ever more malignant to itself while becoming more and more insular and resistant to the rest of the 'body's' attempt to fix it, much less get any sort of use out of it. Fans of each subgenre hate the idea of sharing billing with the other subgenres, and often the very idea that the other subgenres even exist seems irrational to them, eg, the pointless, asinine bickering about WRPG's versus JRPG's.
It wouldn't be half as imbecilic as it is if it weren't all done for the reason I suspect it is: everyone wants the coveted genre's
name. For years, the term 'RPG' stood for something that was at least
perceived to occupy a higher, more intelligent, more artistically important seat than other genres. Platformers? You jump on shit. Shooters? Self explanatory. Role-playing games? Vast, developed settings, deep casts, and intricate plots. Merely being called an RPG, even today, is held to
mean something by genre devotees, and to be called something
other than an RPG is to be known as something
less than an RPG. The arguments are invariably, therefore, about what kind of game gets to wear the crown of 'true' RPG-dom, with everyone else getting to fall in line behind or beneath it.
This is, naturally, something that will
never resolve itself. So, rather than splitting as it should have, its necessary mitosis fell all over itself indignantly, and now more than a decade later we have the 'tumor.'
So when you show up and ask a simple yet bold question, the usual suspects inevitably toe the party line to back a horse that's not even running the same race, if you'll forgive me for mixing turns of phrase.
I feel compelled to say this because it seems like you honestly didn't know things were like this, or you earnestly thought things wouldn't boil down to a sub-sub-genre slap-fight if you did. Either way, I regret to see your idealism so predictably subverted.