The Bible, especially since I'm not the least religious.
Oh, and Dante's Inferno in a 1910's edition.
Oh, and Dante's Inferno in a 1910's edition.
You're absolutely right, there is nothing about stories where a female lead bemoans the fact that her entire existence is dependent on marriage that could possibly have any relevance to 19th century English society. Why would I think such a silly thing?Zeeky_Santos said:Jane Austen was a 19th century novelist. They did not change anything they were important at the time because they were the precise equivalents of tv soap operas. Seriously, they were published chapter by chapter and filled with 'action' that people would keep on reading because 'lord British just kissed his wife's twin sister' and 'amnesia' etc etc. They did not change things. Post WWI novels did.AcacianLeaves said:Response Type 3: "Important" books that were relevant and changed society at the time of publishing, but the language use and situations do not translate well to modernity so you have no idea why people think highly of them. (IE anything by Jane Austen)
WORD, I loved The Hobbit, but Lord of the Rings just....no. Too long, too distant, couldn't manage to care for ANYONE.comadorcrack said:DAMMIT! Ninja's everywhere up in the ***** ¬¬RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
I'd say the Lord of the rings really. Because the Hobbit is awesome and Witty and Charming right from the begining....
I love The Hobbit ...
♥♥
I ended up reading this twice and saw the old black and white movie for school. Its kind of OK I guess. The really boring ones are probably William Wordsworth's Prellude (although technically a poem) and the middle two Twilight novels.Stryc9 said:To Kill a Mockingbird. Forced to read it in English, boring as shit. Also pretty much anything else that was assigned reading in school, somehow they always manage to pick the dullest most boring books.
Actually, I agree with this. I read the original LOTR books, and The Hobbit, and just couldn't stand them. And I'm an avid reader, I've been reading since I was barely a toddler (my nan taught me at a very early age) and started reading proper literature as soon as I started secondary school, aged 11. I love good literature, planning to read a bunch of Gothic Horror when I get some free time (Frankenstein, Dorian Grey, etc.). But I just could not read the Lord Of The Rings books. I feel slightly bad about it, especially as I loved the films. Hell, my uncle took me years ago to see the two places that inspired the Two Towers of Orthanc and Minas Morgul (Sarehole Mill and Perret's Folly, both near my family home in Birmingham). And even that wasn't inspiring enough for me.RhombusHatesYou said:Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.