Most boring/difficult books you've ever read.

Recommended Videos

Wadders

New member
Aug 16, 2008
3,796
0
0
Gotta be The Last of the Mohicans.

Loved the Micheal Mann film, but the book is fucking dry. I read like 40 pages of it before I just though. "Fuck this for a laugh, I'll just watch the movie again"
 

D0WNT0WN

New member
Sep 28, 2008
808
0
0
Try Shakespeare when you are 13 years old.

I dont mind him now, but at 13 it is pure unadulterated torture.
 

newfoundsky

New member
Feb 9, 2010
576
0
0
MadCapMunchkin said:
The Scarlet Letter. Thank you, Mr. Hawthorne, but I don't want an eleven page description of a woman walking through a door.
I'm currently writing a research paper on this garbage. It's as painful as reading about the door. And the bush. And the jail. Seriously. ITS AN ENTIRE CHAPTER DESCRIBING A DOOR, A JAIL, AND A BUSH. All of which are only mentioned once. The only thing remarkable about the bush is that its a rose bush. And roses are red. And Hester Prynne must wear a red A (for being a slut), a Scarlet Letter if you will, and roses are red! HAWTHORNE YOU GENIUS!

You know what else is red Mr Hawthorne? Blood. Especially the blood that poured forth from my eyes as I read (red, oh shit there it is again!) your sorry excuse for a book.

And I'm expected to sympathize with Hester! I'M EXPECTED TO SYMPATHIZE WITH A CHEATING WIFE WHO HAD SEX WITH THE LOCAL PASTOR. Chillingworth was to good to her. Consequently, the Report button is red. He planned it ALL out.

And how the hell does a comet remotely make a red A? And that's were the book went from dreadfully unbearable to kindling.

EDIT: FIRE IS RED TO OMG!!!!!
 

oktalist

New member
Feb 16, 2009
1,603
0
0
The Double and Notes from Underground, both by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Really good, but downright impenetrable.

Edit: to those people saying Shakespeare: those are plays, not novels. They are meant to be experienced at the theatre.

Also the English translation of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson was alright, but not nearly as good as the film adaptation had led me to believe. The entire first half of the book reads like the minutes of a shareholders' annual meeting, regailing the reader with the most tedious details of the entire histories of every single business mentioned in the story, so the actually interesting bit only starts half-way into the book. Also I do not care how many gigabytes of RAM each character's laptop has. But that is what happens when the author has died before the editor get their hands on a manuscript; the editor's hands are tied to a certain extent, with not being able to send it back with suggestions for alterations.
 

vingtcinq

New member
Sep 7, 2010
71
0
0
Lord of the Flies. Oh my god. I pity the English students who have to endure it and the teachers who do it semester after semester. (though, to be honest, I swear that my English teacher had a crush on Golding)

You're already drowning in symbolism by the third page. So monotonous, so predictable, so terrible.
William Golding, you suck.

edit: Oh, and Nobokov. What a piece of work that man must have been.
 

RamirezDoEverything

New member
Jan 31, 2010
1,167
0
0
RhombusHatesYou said:
Displaying my heresy here, I'll say ANYTHING BY TOLKIEN.
'nuff said, i tried to read the books before i saw the moveis, after two towers and 20 pages of return of the king I just couldn't pain myself to attempt to read it.
 

Da Chi

New member
Sep 6, 2010
401
0
0
speaking of poorly translated I never could get into Rene Descartes. I read a few chapters of his book, Discourse on the Method and he is incredibly dull. I had to hunt for whatever point he was trying to make. But then again it could be translation
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
the December King said:
esperandote said:
Stephen King's Lisey's story, I can't explain why (Partially because I'm not a good reader).
Awww, I thought this one was an excellent return to a truly creepy monster tale for Stephen King! I'm sad you found it dull.
Not dull but hard to follow, it keeps jumping from present to different time periods in the past without notice. And yeah, it kinda not a lot happens.

Rylot said:
orangebandguy said:
Although I've heard The Stand is ten times worse.
Oh dear god yes. I got the extended author's version and it made me want to drive to Maine and punch King in the face. 1100+ pages of character study...it just wouldn't end...
Apocalypsis, I read that too, longest book I will ever read.
 

unoleian

New member
Jul 2, 2008
1,332
0
0
ALuckyChance said:
LustFull0ne said:
Lord of the Flies.

T_T

Never will I read that again. But, I did manage to catch up on my sleep while I was reading it.
To me, Lord of the Flies was one of those books that sounded incredibly interesting on paper, but was really boring on execution.
I actually thoroughly enjoyed that one...boring, it was not.
However, The Death of Ivan Ilyich and War and Peace certainly were. Actually, Russian realist fiction in general I find to be terribly boring and difficult. It's all so....grey and bleak.

---
 

Zirat

New member
May 16, 2009
6,367
0
0
Gravity's Rainbow.

It's interesting but I need a pick-axe to get into it. On two attempts to conquer it I only made it to the second section, The Casino of Herman Goerring (I think that was the title...)
 

Rogue 9

I, Jedi
Jun 22, 2008
321
0
0
One of the few books I can remember giving up on halfway through is The Dragonbone Chair by Tad Williams. I read a lot of fantasy/sci-fi, but I remember finding it incredibly tedious.

Not quite the same, but when the 5th book in Isobelle Carmody's Obernewtyn Chronicles came out (after many many years) I bought it, but after the 4th book which was roughly the size of a brick but in which only a few things happened, I just haven't found myself caring enough to actually get around to reading it.
 

aakibar

New member
Apr 14, 2009
468
0
0
Xpwn3ntial said:
Ayn Rand is a difficult author to read. I still have as of yet to finish Atlas Shrugged. It's good, but difficult.
i am in the middle of the fountainhead and i gotta say its good buttt she need an editor also the way she skips around is very annoying. the philospy behind it is the only thing that is keeping me from putting it down and going off and starting a new book.

besides that-a lot of greek plays we read for humanities are just like stop talking man, and the beginning of the simillrillion is like the friggin bible.
 

NeutralDrow

New member
Mar 23, 2009
9,097
0
0
Sneaky-Pie said:
Moby Dick.

It was terrible.
Same. I know I have to finish it at some point, but it's gonna be difficult.

As for a "difficult" book...The Silmarillion. Don't get me wrong, I like that book. It just took me three tries to get past the first seven or so chapters because I kept getting lost. I'm having similar trouble with Romance of the Three Kingdoms, but playing Dynasty Warriors is helping with that.
 

daftnoize

New member
Aug 23, 2010
204
0
0
[Kira Must Die said:
]Any story that's in old English.
I get what the story is, just not what's actually going on.
What like shakespeare? Think thats pretty renound for not being that boring :p Chaucer on the other hand.....

The brothers K is and was a BIATCH to read. As a good friend put it to me the words are very small and the pages very numerous. I don't know why this one but I found watership down pretty tricky as well.
 

Feste the Jester

New member
Jul 10, 2009
649
0
0
Difficult- Atlas Shrugged just because its so loooooong.

Boring- Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring still havent't finished it its so boring.