Most disappointing ending for a book, movie or video game [Possible Spoilers]

Recommended Videos

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
Cabamacadaf said:
David and Leigh Eddings' The Dreamers. It ended with a god turning back time so that nothing in the series happened, and the worst part was that she could have done it from the beginning making the whole series pointless.
Oh god yes.That ending pissed me off so much.Thanks for making me feel like I wasted my time reading all 4 books
 

Siuki

New member
Nov 18, 2009
706
0
0
Raykuza said:
Borderlands. What's in The Vault? NOTHING! NOOOOTHHIIIIIING!!!!
At least they added Knoxx's vault(plus the glitch you can use) and Crawmerax, so now there is a huge vault to loot and a boss worth dying over.

OT: Same as above. I was looking for something more challenging than something to just chuck bullets at for a minute. On my first run I took him down by tossing some longbows and wasting three clips of my assault rifle.
 

punkrocker27

New member
Mar 24, 2009
418
0
0
Gemore said:
As i said i appreciate originality, when its a good idea.Obscuring the main "message" well, i suppose liking that is a subjective thing. But having a climax off screen, or rather, non existent well. It seems to me like a genuinely bad idea. It gets props for being so out there that you cant help but discuss it, but that doesnt make it a good idea.
Never said it was a good idea. In fact I never said the message was obscured and I disagree with whoever said that. The message is right there on screen all along, the directors just don't shove it in your face the whole time or make it really obvious during any point.
 

Thaliur

New member
Jan 3, 2008
617
0
0
For me it was Lexx (the TV series which started off as four movies).

The movies were awesome, the second season was great, too, but when they started with that whole Fire and Water stuff, the show started to go downhill in my opinion.
Actually, I was already a bit angry when Eva Habermann was replaced in her role as Zev, because she actually DID look good. The new actress always looked quite stupid and for some reason Zev acted a lot more slutty after that change, but at least she still had decent hair in the second season.
Season four was a lot better I think, when they brought up the parody storylines. Still not as good as the movies, but still good. And of course it featured the most realistic portrayal of a TV afternoon I've ever seen on a Science Fiction show.
 

Turkey Braveheart

New member
Apr 15, 2010
218
0
0
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
My nomination:
No Country for Old Men, a movie that followed the main characters' conflict and action only to have the climax happen off screen!
I loved the ending for that movie! The movie isn't centered around the good guy, it's centered around the bad guy. What happens to the antagonist is more important that what happened to the protagonist.

And more to the point of the actual ending, I loved Tommy Lee Jone's monologue to end the film, when he's talking about the dream he had. It's one of the rare moments when a movie finds a great, powerful spot to end. It doesn't add the 10 extra minutes of film that wayyyy too many directors feel they have to put in there.
It didn't cover the antagonist's ending much either, he just limped away.

As for Tommy Lee Jones, how is his scene the real ending? He's not that important.

And that extra ten minutes is called the climax, and if it's not there then why bother following Bardem and Brolin through most of the film? Why the gun battles and chases? Why everyone talking about how insane and out of control Bardem is?
That scene is the "real ending" because it is, literally, the ending. Credits roll after his monologue.

And if you're watching this movie and focusing on the gun battles and chases, then no you aren't going to like how it ends, but that's not my problem. I love the movie and how it ended.
What were you focusing on if the shooting weren't that important?
 

DomM

New member
Nov 18, 2009
15
0
0
Explorator Vimes said:
DomM said:
Just to check, you do mean the fifth book don't you? If so I would definitely listen to the the radio series - if you don't want to listen to all of it you can find you can find the last episode here [http://www.youtube.com/user/XistundTheBookKeeper#p/search/0/TRk456HHeB0]. It picks up from pretty much exactly the point at which the Earth was demolished. Some people thinks it's a bit saccharine sweet, but I thought it was a much more fitting ending to the whole thing.
Yes, the 5th novel, and you are right, that made me feel ever so much better about the whole thing. Thank you for making me now love everything about Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
Happy to be of service.
 

b3nn3tt

New member
May 11, 2010
673
0
0
In terms of books, I found the ending to the King of Torts, by John Grisham to be so very disappointing. I really love the majority of Grisham's work, and that book was on track to be one of my favourites, right up until the very last chapter, where it all just goes wrong

In terms of films, there are so many that I dislike the ending of it's not worth noting them. Suffice to say, any film where the ending feels contrived, I dislike immensely

For games, the only one that I can think of off the top of my head is Enslaved. I hate to use it as an example, because I really love the game as a whole, but the ending just feels like it doesn't really fit, as if they ran out of time to do it properly
 

markisb

New member
May 31, 2010
159
0
0
yea u get to destroy a big space ship but what a stupid cliff hanger. i cant believe they did that. you fly back to save profit and the next game is not even set after you fly back
 

Keppler

New member
Apr 16, 2010
243
0
0
Turkey Braveheart said:
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
My nomination:
No Country for Old Men, a movie that followed the main characters' conflict and action only to have the climax happen off screen!
I loved the ending for that movie! The movie isn't centered around the good guy, it's centered around the bad guy. What happens to the antagonist is more important that what happened to the protagonist.

And more to the point of the actual ending, I loved Tommy Lee Jone's monologue to end the film, when he's talking about the dream he had. It's one of the rare moments when a movie finds a great, powerful spot to end. It doesn't add the 10 extra minutes of film that wayyyy too many directors feel they have to put in there.
It didn't cover the antagonist's ending much either, he just limped away.

As for Tommy Lee Jones, how is his scene the real ending? He's not that important.

And that extra ten minutes is called the climax, and if it's not there then why bother following Bardem and Brolin through most of the film? Why the gun battles and chases? Why everyone talking about how insane and out of control Bardem is?
That scene is the "real ending" because it is, literally, the ending. Credits roll after his monologue.

And if you're watching this movie and focusing on the gun battles and chases, then no you aren't going to like how it ends, but that's not my problem. I love the movie and how it ended.
What were you focusing on if the shooting weren't that important?
I didn't say the shooting wasn't important, I said it's far from the only thing there. The few scenes that do involve gun fights (or air piston fights...) are well done and fit within' the movie contextually. I love it when Chigurh kills the mexicans in the hotel and follows it by sitting down on the bed and taking his socks off as though they (not he) are dirty. And that's one of the reasons I love the movie; the excellent way in which a window was opened into each character's mind through their various actions. Every single character was developed to the fullest extent, and in such subtle ways.

My favorite scene, for example, is when Chigurh is in a gas station and has the discussion about the significance of the quarter with the manager after telling him not to put it in his pocket. Even the simple simple pair of lines when he meets up with Carson Wells later:

Wells: "Do you have any idea how goddamn crazy you are?"
Chigurh: "You mean the nature of this conversation?"

Those are two of the moments where it's made abundantly clear that this character is not just a hitman with a gun. He's cerebral, calculated, and exactly what Wells describes him as: "He's a peculiar man. You could even say that he has principles"

I pointed to Tommy Lee Jone's monologue at the end because it's a powerful look at who he is while at the same time it has broader (though subtle) significance and parallels to the movie at large. To me, the story it told and the moment it left us at was a gripping way to end the movie.
 

Exocet

Pandamonium is at hand
Dec 3, 2008
726
0
0
I may be burned at the stake,but I feel as if 1984's ending was meh.
I mean,the whole atmosphere behind the book is amazing,but the ending pretty much nullifies the entire book.It's like nothing happened.
I'm aware that one of the points behind it is that nothing changed,the country is still a totalitarian hellhole,but it still seems that the entire story is pretty pointless.
It's hard to describe,but I feel as if Orwell could have done better at the end.Perhaps someone charged with burning the records finding out about the whole thing and questionning the system,leading to another cycle of Big Brother preserving itself.
 

Jumping_Over_Fences

New member
Apr 15, 2009
978
0
0
Turkey Braveheart said:
Jumping_Over_Fences said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
I've heard that a lot and it makes no sense. The story doesn't really follow Tommy Lee Jones and he does very little that's relevant to the plot. He's just an observer and commentator. By that standard, C3PO is the star of Star Wars.
Jumping_Over_Fences said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
My nomination:
No Country for Old Men, a movie that followed the main characters' conflict and action only to have the climax happen off screen!
Actually, the true main character of the story was Tommy Lee Jones, and not Josh Brolin. Hence the title of the film.
I've heard that a lot and it makes no sense. The story doesn't really follow Tommy Lee Jones and he does very little that's relevant to the plot. He's just an observer and commentator. By that standard, C3PO is the star of Star Wars.
Not at all, the story of Ed Bell tracking down Anton Chigurh all while Bell laments about how the world is evolving into something completely different than he is used to is the main plot. As is made clear by the title. Llewelyn Moss is macguffin of the film. He distracts you from the message of the film. If you don't wish to pay attention to the message, you can just watch the action unfold.

Also, if he wasn't meant as the main character, why was it called No Country for Old Men?
The title is irrelevant. Once again, think of C3PO. Change Star Wars: A New Hope to Star Wars: The adventures of C3PO and it still isn't about him.

Ask yourself, did he have the majority of screen time? Did he make a meaningful impact on the main characters? Did he have a great revelation? No to all three.

He was there to comment on Brolin and Bardem, which seems to concede their importance while only Brolin has anything to do with him and then only briefly. He neither saved nor killed nor caught anyone. And I got the sense he already knew there was evil in the world and that is was changing into something alien to him. That is why he has been planning to retire for some time.

And the McGuffin is the money.
It appears we are at an impasse. We are both bringing up good points, but neither is willing to change their opinion. I say, let's just agree to disagree. Good day to you sir.
 

Gemore

New member
Sep 15, 2010
131
0
0
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
Keppler said:
Turkey Braveheart said:
My nomination:
No Country for Old Men, a movie that followed the main characters' conflict and action only to have the climax happen off screen!
I loved the ending for that movie! The movie isn't centered around the good guy, it's centered around the bad guy. What happens to the antagonist is more important that what happened to the protagonist.

And more to the point of the actual ending, I loved Tommy Lee Jone's monologue to end the film, when he's talking about the dream he had. It's one of the rare moments when a movie finds a great, powerful spot to end. It doesn't add the 10 extra minutes of film that wayyyy too many directors feel they have to put in there.
It didn't cover the antagonist's ending much either, he just limped away.

As for Tommy Lee Jones, how is his scene the real ending? He's not that important.

And that extra ten minutes is called the climax, and if it's not there then why bother following Bardem and Brolin through most of the film? Why the gun battles and chases? Why everyone talking about how insane and out of control Bardem is?
That scene is the "real ending" because it is, literally, the ending. Credits roll after his monologue.

And if you're watching this movie and focusing on the gun battles and chases, then no you aren't going to like how it ends, but that's not my problem. I love the movie and how it ended.
What were you focusing on if the shooting weren't that important?
I didn't say the shooting wasn't important, I said it's far from the only thing there. The few scenes that do involve gun fights (or air piston fights...) are well done and fit within' the movie contextually. I love it when Chigurh kills the mexicans in the hotel and follows it by sitting down on the bed and taking his socks off as though they (not he) are dirty. And that's one of the reasons I love the movie; the excellent way in which a window was opened into each character's mind through their various actions. Every single character was developed to the fullest extent, and in such subtle ways.

My favorite scene, for example, is when Chigurh is in a gas station and has the discussion about the significance of the quarter with the manager after telling him not to put it in his pocket. Even the simple simple pair of lines when he meets up with Carson Wells later:

Wells: "Do you have any idea how goddamn crazy you are?"
Chigurh: "You mean the nature of this conversation?"

Those are two of the moments where it's made abundantly clear that this character is not just a hitman with a gun. He's cerebral, calculated, and exactly what Wells describes him as: "He's a peculiar man. You could even say that he has principles"

I pointed to Tommy Lee Jone's monologue at the end because it's a powerful look at who he is while at the same time it has broader (though subtle) significance and parallels to the movie at large. To me, the story it told and the moment it left us at was a gripping way to end the movie.
Its this exact depth that i really struggle to see in this film. But i think this might just be the kind of viewer i am. I really care about characters, I prefer to focus on the message and subtext of a film. I absolutely love the Matrix reloaded, and continue to re watch it just to learn new things.
 

Susano

New member
Dec 25, 2008
436
0
0
bak00777 said:
"It" the movie. This movie was so good, it was creepy, yet made you want to keeping watching. But then the ending, which they could have set up to be scarier, was sooooo bad. The kiler demon Clown that has been killing children for centuries, turns out to be a big spider. In order to kill it they shoot a silver earring with a slingshot, knock the spider over, and kick it in the stomach. Then they go back to their lives. I have heard that the book's ending is a hell of a lot better, but i have yet to get my hands on it...*crosses fingers* here's hoping that is true.
Aaaaaaauuugh that movie.
I read the book, so I decided "oh hey, I'll get the movie to see what it's like!"
They explained NOTHING. There were SO MANY EVENTS that there were character motivation for in the book that weren't explained, there were events taken out that explained other events, there were events that were just plain cool/awesome/disgusting that were taken out...
Stuff like the monster being a spider, or repeating things having power, or whatever were chucked into the movie with little to no explanation.

YES the book is much better, if you have a local library they might have it there?
It's really quite long though, so I suppose that's the movie's failing. You couldn't put all that information into a reasonable-length movie.
The ending to the book is so much more fleshed out/different that it might as well count as an alternate ending, so while you do have spoilers in your head, they aren't HUUUUGE?

One thing I thought the movie did well though was the clown. The way he said "we all float down here". Jeez, scary.
 

My name is Fiction

New member
Sep 27, 2010
3,209
0
0
LordVikingofFire said:
Harry Potter 7.
Hay JK Rowling! I wasted a good amount of my life reading your books and in the last book that was all you could think of? I did not even finish the last book to avoid the lyrical train wreak.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
EllEzDee said:
Zannkimaru said:
Joseph Harrison said:
Mafia 2, the game was great it just had a horribly anticlimactic and sudden ending.
Oh god the ending made me go WTF!!! i mean seriously is this sequel material or dlc material? what the hell just happened?!
Having played the first Mafia, which had a weird but fulfilling ending for a mafia game, i'd love to know the ending to this bastard child of a game.
Anyone care to spoil it for me?
After a rather hideous amount of fuck-ups Vito manages to save his own arse, but Joe isn't apart of the deal (unbeknown to Vito at the time), so he's taken away and killed. The death doesn't happen on screen since the game then cuts away, but you'd be surprised at the number of people who consider it to be a double rainbow ("what does this mean!?").

It's not a good ending, but if anyone tries telling you it's difficult to understand or even in need of further explanation they've got something loose.
 

D Moness

Left the building
Sep 16, 2010
1,146
0
0
Shock and Awe said:
The Knowing, that movie was so interesting, then it went with the most predictable and cliched ending possible.

ALIENSSSSSSS
I didn't have to much of a problem with that my problem was more.

It was more the adam and eve reference with the tree that annoyed the hell out of me. I mean where the heck did that come from.
 

Tomas Krystinik

New member
May 28, 2010
49
0
0
Oh god that's a toughy. I've played so many good games that had bad endings, it's almost impossible to choose. No wait, it's not. Shadow Of The Collosus. Hands down, no doubt about it. I stared at the screen after it was over with my jaw dropped for at least five minutes before putting the disk in its case and setting it on top of the pile of things never to touch again. Such an epic game, too, but to me the ending makes all the difference. A game can go from being the coolest thing ever to sitting on that pile just because of its ending - it's no easy task but it is possible.
Runner up is Obscure The Aftermath's ending, but that whole game was terrible. I made an honest review of that game but haven't posted it anywhere for fear of sending one of the game makers into a coma by exposing the err of their ways so brutally that it might break their brains. The ending wasn't even the worst part of that game, but it was still really really bad.
 

spartan1077

New member
Aug 24, 2010
3,222
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
The Dark Tower series
After several books searching for the Dark Tower, the main character is then sent back to the beginning of his journey with no memory of it. I enjoy a Greek tragedy like the next guy but come on!
I've read through the series a few ties and see that the ending is actually a happy ending! In the first book, he is being chased by the dark man(Flag) and throughout the series repeats that if only he had the horn, he could win. In the end, the last sentence describes him shifting the horn from one side to the other! So it changes everytime he goes to the tower, and soon he will not have to repeat it again.

Okay a disappointing ending?
The Passage by Justin Cronin(GO READ IT)
So there is journal excerpts throughout the book, and thats important. Anyways, through the whole book this group of people try to find safety from some sort of super human infected and finally 2 go off and get married and tell the others they'd go to the twon they are going to and find them. So happy ending right? One last excerpt ends like this

...I think I hear gunshots. I'll go look..

Journal excerpts presented for case of Bouldertown Massacre.


So instead of living fine, some asshole goes and shoots everyone up...although it's a trilogy so it's still disappointing to know that I'll have to wait years and years to find out what happened.