"The tides go in, the tides go out. You can't explain that!"Blatherscythe said:
-The most recognizable and famous man in American news.
*sigh*
Most Evil Human In History Aside From the Big Two
- Thread starter Blatherscythe
- Start date
Recommended Videos
-The most recognizable and famous man in American news.
*sigh*
Scary part? He's sometimes the voice of reason among the Fox stable. Particularly to Glenn Beck.Blatherscythe said:Bill O'Reilly, asshole needs to take his own advice and shut the fuck up. And then maybe go read a history book or a book on economics or politics outside of extreame right-wing bullshit.Harry Mason said:I'm going with this guy...
No, he's not really "evil" or the "worst ever," but he does have a large part in American civilization back pedaling so voraciously and being so proud of it. He really should be taken off the air. With a sniper bullet, if that's what it takes.
DING DING DING! An explination. I read about the guy, he wanted to be the figure head of Communism when Stalin died. Yes because Communism definatly wants to have leaders elevated above the rest (sarcasm), Mao, like Stalin, butchered Marx's idea to exploit a nation and create an enviroment of fear and control that still lives to this day. I think with how many dictators exploit the ideals of Communism Marx must be constantly shifting around in his grave.Yureina said:
Blatherscythe said:
Dulcinea said:
To both of you, I was just supporting the point that it's not having a sexual attraction to children that's wrong; it's actually having sex with them. I've never personally met any pedophiles, but I gather that there are quite a few who have an attraction yet understand that the actual sex would be wrong, and so pretty much just deny their sexuality for their entire lives because expressing it would be unconscionable. I'm not sure I feel comfortable saying that kind of person is evil. The example of a solider was to say that the potential to do something shouldn't be counted the same as the act.
When I said pedophile, I mean't child rapist. Getting off to kids is wrong in it's own way but as long as it doesn't escalate from a mere fetish it's tolerable.falconsgyre said:
I just wanted to highlight that line because it struck me as being the most interesting in your response. You seem to be suggesting that Pol Pot shouldn't be considered such an "evil" human being because he truly believed his various social programs would ultimately benefit Cambodia, and yet you lovingly refer to Hitler and Stalin as "The Big 2" when it comes to evil people. Hitler was completely and utterly convinced wiping out the Jewish people was a worthy cause, and Stalin was convinced his collectivization policy would significantly improve the efficiency of agriculture (I know that wasn't the only "evil" thing Stalin did, but it's the most noteworthy). I'm not arguing with you or anything, I just thought it was worth pointing out that these "monsters" of history often good intentions - it just so happens that they also put a tremendous amount of stake in the old adage, "the ends justify the means". A little too much, if I do say so myself.Blatherscythe said:
Before reading furthure please note that I am not saying that you are evil for following christianity.
dame just one guy or a whole group if a whole group it would have to be christianity.
About 2000 years-ago not mordern day christens very very very sorry if you took offense and if modderaters take this down i understand-but considering that they basiclly had more power then any one else at the time from about 1000AD and 1600AD they ruled your life in Europe.
some priests had heratics, witches, and homosexuals tourtued or burned at the stake (thats where the term ****** was inveted to mean gays, they tossed them on witches fires saying that they where faggots of wood)
They started a holy war killing thousands and making a feud that goes on to this day destroyed many many native religions when exploration started
science and further human advancement barely moved and inch
not saying that any mordern christiens are evil today just saying that much pain and suffering has been done by those who say they do Gods work.
I know that christiens have done alot of good but in my own opinion christianity has alot against it.
dame just one guy or a whole group if a whole group it would have to be christianity.
About 2000 years-ago not mordern day christens very very very sorry if you took offense and if modderaters take this down i understand-but considering that they basiclly had more power then any one else at the time from about 1000AD and 1600AD they ruled your life in Europe.
some priests had heratics, witches, and homosexuals tourtued or burned at the stake (thats where the term ****** was inveted to mean gays, they tossed them on witches fires saying that they where faggots of wood)
They started a holy war killing thousands and making a feud that goes on to this day destroyed many many native religions when exploration started
science and further human advancement barely moved and inch
not saying that any mordern christiens are evil today just saying that much pain and suffering has been done by those who say they do Gods work.
I know that christiens have done alot of good but in my own opinion christianity has alot against it.
I think you're confusing evil with stupidity, mine isn't really an individual but a group of people a find rather repugnant; the Puritan settlers. They oppressed people who expressed any form of individuality, accused their own people of witchcraft for their own personal gain, slaughtered the inhabitants of an entire nation and enslaved milllions of Africans. Also, I'd like to point out that this isn't a hate speech against Americans, it's not their fault that they're descendants of such a vile, cruel and sanctimonious people.TheCommie12 said:
Well, there is one human officially called the most evil human being of all time, ALbert FIsh, quick googlesearch of him should show you why. Namely he kidnapped small children, ate them and then sent letters to their parents apologizing and telling them how they tasted and how he cooked them.
But there was one serial killer, H, H Holmes, who killed HUNDREDS of people in a Saw-Esque Mansion which he observed via security camera. They would follow mazes of doors that led to brick walls and stairs to nowhere until they finally triggered a gas chamber room which would kill them and then send their body down a greased chute into a basement where their bodies would be fired and coated in lime before being sold as medical cadavers.
Also he stole 2 kids and collected their insurance before killing them and holding them to ransom (THe father was unaware the children were dead)
I nominate him.
But there was one serial killer, H, H Holmes, who killed HUNDREDS of people in a Saw-Esque Mansion which he observed via security camera. They would follow mazes of doors that led to brick walls and stairs to nowhere until they finally triggered a gas chamber room which would kill them and then send their body down a greased chute into a basement where their bodies would be fired and coated in lime before being sold as medical cadavers.
Also he stole 2 kids and collected their insurance before killing them and holding them to ransom (THe father was unaware the children were dead)
I nominate him.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Or in their cases, irrational racism, use of scape-goats, blind nationalism and not knowing shit about agriculture on Stalin or Pot's case. I was going to use either Pol Pot or Adi Amin, the deciding point for me was basically the fact that Amin did and participated in such horrible things knowing it was wrong and did it for power and money, Pot was a delusional idiot. Also, the "Big Two" is basicly avoid the whole thread being filled with Stalin or Hitler as an answer.SonicKoala said:
Definitely, while I have forgotten much from last semesters history class, a lot of what I read about him was face palm city. Had he been in any other part of the world, I believe he would not have risen to such a level power. Now this is only speculation (I have forgotten much) but I think he relied on the ignorance and the desire for a better life that gripped the Chinese after the hardships with feudalism and the Japanese occupation. They wanted it so badly that they gave power to somebody they knew nothing about. People who knew better were either killed or fled to Taiwan. Essentially he gained their trust enough to walk behind them and hold a knife to their throat while speaking lies in their ears and covering their eyes. Overtly symbolic I know but that is how I interpret it.Blatherscythe said: