Those in bold are neither incorrect nor grammatical errors. It is only the United States if I recall that does not add a 'u' to various words such as Colour, although I personally never found the point despite being Canadian. As for "Dialogue", that is the correct spelling of the word.Labyrinth said:Here's the list.
Your
You're
Their
There
They're
Poor
Pour
Paw
Colour
Labour
Dialogue
Diarrhoea
Paedophile
...and anything vaguely connected to WebSp33k.
It annoys me how US english alters the spelling of some words from traditional english such as color/colour and center/centre. But it's so common on the internet that I hardly notice now.Bourne said:Those in bold are neither incorrect nor grammatical errors. It is only the United States if I recall that does not add a 'u' to various words such as Colour, although I personally never found the point despite being Canadian.
Agreed. Definitely. It makes me feel so sad when someone uses 'u' instead of 'you'.Simski said:The two worst things for me are when people say "u" instead of "You" and "i" instead of "I".
You are fucking stupid if you do it, it doesn't matter that it's easier.
IT MAKES YOU LOOK RETARDED.
liek u shud stick too shoesoddresin said:This thread sucks, because most of the people have posted grammatical or spelling errors themselves. The cobbler should stick to shoes.
Agreed, but what really annoys me is people using random amounts of full stops to make their ellipses. An ellipsis has three 'dots'. No more, no less. Taking up half a line with your dots does not make your writing more suspenseful. Similarly, a dozen exclamation marks at the end of the sentence does not make you sound more surprised than one would have: although whenever I see it, I always imagine an idiot being given a balloon at the zoo for some reason, so maybe it does.Jonathan Hexley said:And this isn't really a grammatical error, but don't end every sentence with an ellipsis.
My Science teacher got mad at me for spelling like that. He said that's not how things are spelled.Labyrinth said:Here's the list.
Colour
Labour
Dialogue
Diarrhoea
Paedophile
Dear God. I hope you're kidding.crimsondynamics said:The European Commission have just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU, rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a five year phase in plan that would be known as "EuroEnglish".
In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump for joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of the "k". This should klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter.
There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with the "f". This will make words like "fotograf" 20% shorter.
In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always
ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e"s in the language is disgraseful, and they should go away.
By the 4th year, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v".
During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. After zis fifz year, ve vil hav a realy sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubls or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi to understand each ozer
ZE DREAM VIL FINALI KUM TRU!
No. Please. I've had enough of that in Italian and French this week.Maet said:Since we're all here, who wants to hammer out relative pronouns? [who/whom/whose/which/that]