Makes sense to me. Men are required for breeding and only a few are left. They can still produce young well into old age. Women have a reproductive shelf life. It varies to a degree but usually odds of reproduction tend to drop sharply after 40. Between killing off and cannibalizing the women as they pass their reproductive life, and having a newborn to eat every 9 months(a year more realistically) per woman, It may be enough to stave off total species starvation for a time, though during that time its likely that populations would shrink.Asita said:...I'm almost scared to ask, but why just women? Ultimately it's cannibalism and that's unsustainable in the long term as a main source of sustenance unless additional circumstances (such as a VERY efficient (read: near cold-fusion level of efficiency) cloning method, for the sake of example) are added, and dividing along gender lines like that seems even more short-sighted. The very concept confuses me.Windknight said:A rather repulsive amateur fiction circle created a shared universe to set all their stories in where the majority of men and all livestock are wiped out by a virus.
The result? Women are figuratively and literally cattle. 'Used' while their 'hot', killed and eaten when their not.
One of those things that makes you wonder just what the f*** is wrong with people.
Still not enough food on its own to feed everyone. Basically its a long term Donner party strategy. If the species can survive long enough to find another food source, it may still survive. If humans cannot find another food source, we will cannibalize ourselves into extinction. This method of mass cannibalization simply buys us time.