Most MEDIOCRE Game You've Ever Played

Recommended Videos

Cranky

New member
Mar 12, 2012
321
0
0
Skyrim bored me a lot, I just can't pinpoint what exactly, I think it's just a cumulative of all my gripes.

Borderlands comes to mind. Goddamnit I wasted so much time on that piece of shit, I really cannot believe myself.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
I'm very good at avoiding games I won't love. The most "meh" I've felt while playing a game has been probably RealMyst, because it's so incredibly unstable.
 

Nightmare-Child

New member
Jul 14, 2010
251
0
0
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion. It just gets remarkably dull after about level 20 or so. The reason being that there isn't a whole lot of incentive to do anything past that point. You could complete an extremely difficult quest, and at best the quest giver says "Well done, here's 50 gold." Devil May Cry 2, and Xenosaga Episode 2 are close seconds.
 

Squidbulb

New member
Jul 22, 2011
306
0
0
Psychonauts. It was just so boring, and it didn't really do anything new.
I'll add in Skyrim. It was just a few locations and quests copied and pasted across the map, and there isn't really much interesting stuff to do.
 

Chester Rabbit

New member
Dec 7, 2011
1,004
0
0
Tenchu Z. It had a fluid fun, updated stealth engine sure. But the rest just felt soooo lazy.

Five levels reused over and over again. Same characters to kill only thing that stopped them from being the same character was that the color of their clothes changed, and the game actually penalizes you for being stealthful.

One would think you would get a superb rank for sneaking past every guard and slitting the throat of your target and leaving his henchmen to find his body the next morning bewildered and shamed that they never heard a sound; but nope you didn't kill everyone so you fail.
 

Talon_Skywarp

New member
Aug 2, 2010
311
0
0
Warhammer Space Marine.

Was really liking it at the start...then 4 hours in I was in a trance not really playing attention to anything.

All together, a really bland game
 

hooksashands

New member
Apr 11, 2010
550
0
0
All the Mass Effects. I didn't think traveling the galaxy could be so boring until I found out 2/3rds of it can't be explored. When you're not being talked to by redshirt NPCs or deciding who to execute, it's chest high walls and the art of sitting behind them waiting for your biotics to recharge. ZZZzzzzzZZZz
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
Call of Juarez - Bound in Blood.

It's not a shite game but neither is it great. It's okay to stumble through when i've nothing else to do.
 

Soopy

New member
Jul 15, 2011
455
0
0
Skyrim: It's a mile wide and an inch deep. There is no replayability either.
 

Lunatic High

New member
Apr 14, 2012
228
0
0
HUNTED. I tried to take it back but EB games said no. I can't even give the fucking thing away. Also the first 2 Fear games just the first two to hell with the third.
 

Lunatic High

New member
Apr 14, 2012
228
0
0
RustlessPotato said:
Final Fantasy 13. Really was mediocre, i did finish it though because I payed 60 euros for it, but still. It's a game i played because I had nothing else to do.
I payed half price for it thinking, "It can't possibly be that bad" how wrong I was. They really shit the bed on it. I could only really play it for any length of time half drunk.
 

Drummie666

New member
Jan 1, 2011
739
0
0
I'd say skyrim. I was going to say Mass Effect 2, but I have something of a hate on for it as there is actually bad design choices, not just average ones.

Skyrim is just plain mediocre. Stealth, magic, combat, smithing, dialogue and everything else is as simple as you could possibly make it. There's nothing particularly interesting or complex about it. It's all that's really required and that's it, there's nothing more to it that actually makes it interesting. It's pretty much the definition of mediocre.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
Huh. Gaming mediocrity. Good question.

The Halo series comes to mind. It's competently executed, it's pretty enough to look at, but the actual shooting just feels rote. It's all perfectly stuck together and it all works very well, but it's turned into such a masturbatory subculture I just can't work up any kind of enthusiasm.

The same with Gears of War. We can credit it for the now standard cover-based mechanics, but what makes the whole package mediocre for me is the contradictory mechanics and design choices. The game favors protracted firefights, and yet you still look like a 'roided up supersoldier? Dafuq?

Most of the Need for Speed games of the last decade are also mediocre. They seem to be perpetually stuck in "The Fast and the Furious" mode, and everything just seems like they're trying insanely hard to ooze personality - but nothing really comes through. The only positive comments I could think of would concern how the NFS series kept FMV sequences going in an era where everything that was not part of the actual gameplay was usually relegated to pre-rendered cutscenes.

You could also add sports games to the mix. Pick any license and switch the roster around year after year after year, with minute changes and innovations thrown in here and there. It all very much feels like a paint-by-numbers design job.

Then, and I hate saying this, you've got a lot of what comes out of some smaller European publishers, specifically Kalypso Media. Everything these guys produce ends up being resoundingly bland, or is utterly destroyed by a small army of bugs that render their products unplayable.

Who here remembers Dungeons, for instance? It was billed as a sort of spiritual successor to Dungeon Keeper 2, but the mechanics were not only completely different, but badly thought out and implemented.

Another thing that really gets on my nerves is when publishers figure everything can be remade as a shooter. Syndicate is a sufficiently clear indicator that the public mindset isn't quite as consumed with the desire to shoot down mooks as investors and project pitchers seem to think.
 

Absolutionis

New member
Sep 18, 2008
420
0
0
Bioshock.

-Heralded as a 'spiritual successor' to System Shock, the story and item system was so dumbed down that it was tremendously underwhelming.
-Weapons upgrades looked awesome for a few seconds, but then they were so sparse it didn't matter. Plus, weapons felt weak.
-Big Daddies were terrifying in that first scene. Then you fight one and it's a game of cover-hugging or danging around a pillar.
-Rapture looks really cool at first, but then all the areas begin to look the same.
-The artist ripped out of House of Wax was an interesting diversion, but had nothing to do with anything.
-The last boss was a typical last boss with many forms.
-The 'famous' scene with Ryan was just bland.
-For a game that bragged about 'choice', it was a bland execution.
-The endings were just slideshows.
-Turning into a Big Daddy yourself got me a bit excited, but then all it does is up your resilience to damage and change your footstep sounds.

Mediocre.
I'd play it again, but there are so many better choices.

People's excitement over Bioshock Infinite is mind-blowing.
Just bring back System Shock. That series actually is left open for a sequel.
 

Antonio Torrente

New member
Feb 19, 2010
869
0
0
Dirty Hipsters said:
Perfect Dark Zero

Such a shame really, because Perfect Dark on the N64 was awesome.
What did you expect? Rare is already in it's last legs as a great developer after jumping from Nintendo to Microsoft.

And then they followed it with two disappointing titles namely Kameo: Elements of Power which is Mediocre (not good, not bad) and Conker: Live and Reloaded which let's not talk about it.
 

deathbydeath

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,363
0
0
Borderlands, Jesus Christ. That game was so ... dull. Pew pew, jump in a car, hit something, ???, Profit. The monochromatic brown perpetual desert sure as hell didn't help, either.
 

Ratboy1337

New member
Mar 21, 2012
25
0
0
I am torn between two games. They are Red Dead Redemption and Final Fantasy XIII. Strangely enough I bought both of those games at the same time. Anyway, here is what I didn't like about them.

Red Dead Redemption looked like it was going to be this awesome, action packed western. It did have moments of awesome, it did have action, and it was definitely western. However, It took way too long to get from place to place, with very little going on in between. I was expecting my half hour horse rides from one settlement to the next to be interrupted by bandits, or Natives, or something. They weren't. It was just me staring at a horses butt for thirty minutes at a time. That's when the game lost me.

Final Fantasy XIII was just ridiculous. It had a convoluted plot that would throw in characters in a cutscene, act like you're supposed to know who they were, and then kill them in a long, drawn out, boss battle of attrition. I very much enjoyed the combat at first. But after twenty hours it just got tedious. Then after another twenty hours they gave every playable character every class. Basically, a character that started off as a DPS/Tank could now be a healer/buffer/debuffer. It was just a mess and extremely dull.

Anyway, those are my top two mediocre games :D
 

Raika

New member
Jul 31, 2011
552
0
0
Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception comes immediately to mind. After the stellar second game, the contrived setpieces, idiotic retreading story, and wasted potential of the third really underwhelmed me. It's not bad by any means(well, okay, the story is pretty terrible), it's just... bleh.
 

Ratboy1337

New member
Mar 21, 2012
25
0
0
deathbydeath said:
Borderlands, Jesus Christ. That game was so ... dull. Pew pew, jump in a car, hit something, ???, Profit. The monochromatic brown perpetual desert sure as hell didn't help, either.
I found Borderlands fun for one play through. I enjoyed the multiplayer with friends, but that was about it. Your description of it is perfect.