I would argue that if your only qualifier for being a highly skilled event is *boom* fiery death for 13 people, you still have to count NASCAR. After all, you are in a 3800 pound (That is INCREDIBLY fucking heavy) car traveling around a track with 41 other people, all driving cars that are equal to yours, and the only thing that sets them apart from yours is the way you set the car up (Spring rate, gear ratio, etc) and driver skill. EVERY other motor sport has a much lighter cars, with differences in cars and in some cases trucks, separating them from their competitors. Look at F1. Ferrari OWNED that sport, no other car comes close to having their legacy. Look at WRC, Subaru won a bunch of championships. NASCAR is more standardized, but that places MORE emphasis on driver skill, not less.Skorpyo said:Racing.
No, not NASCAR; good, ridiculously fast, F1 racing!
One slip up and BOOM! 13 guys are in a mangled pile of fire and broken fiber-glass.
EDIT: It appears I've forgotten Rally Racing. Odd, since it's one of my favorites. :S
Yes, I think Rally is more entertaining than NASCAR, but I don't think it is inherently MORE skillful, just differently skillful.
That takes more balls, not more skill. A drifter on a track does all the same maneuvers, just within the confines of a drift track. Rally drivers have more trust in their own skills to stay on the road, but a drifter can do the same things if he trusted himself to do it without the safety barricades.Snotnarok said:Yeah Rally is scary shit, the games give a glimpse at how insane it is, but just watching the videos is insane. How about Group B rally? Holy too fast for that sport batman.