The fact that there is a "persistent false narrative" (I'm not claiming there is or isn't) is enough a problem by itself, perception is often more important than the facts and if your employee repeatedly, continually creates enough controversy with comments that cause a "persistent false narrative" sooner or later the hammer will drop if you cannot get them to shut their mouths.Silvanus said:I recognise fully that the term "subhuman" is a shitty thing to say. Definitely. Agreed.J Tyran said:If I went on Twitter called "JtyranFromDFDS" (not my real name obviously) and kept ranting about how the companies customers were awful, subhuman fascists I would expect to get sacked. Probably after the first occurrence too, when you associate your employers into your social media entity in any way you have to maintain standards.
But he said that term in reference to "college-age conservabros", not simply applying it to gamers, not applying it to "those of us in the forum". Does that excuse the language? No, of course not. But I'm getting equally sick of this persistent false narrative that he was insulting each and every one of us, or gamers as a whole, when he said this stuff.
Besides which the "conservabros" thing is damning enough really, anytime you start generalising groups with prejudicial pronouns you're playing with fire.