Multiplayer Wii shooter?

[A Playful Shark]

If they made a Mario FPS, something inoffesive like Mario Paintball or a Mario FPS that had you throwing fireballs and hammers at people, would anyone play it? Or rather, would anyone be really REALLY excited about it?

Knowing how bad nintendo is with "different" mario games (mario baseball, tennis, mario party) it would probably blow. really hard.

I have no legssssssssssssss just kidding that's a horrible thing to joke about I'm going to hell.

But mouse control is definitely better for shooters.

To hell with you!

I've had people argue console control is better because you pull a trigger to shoot, making it more realistic, and much better.
The worst part is it's been more than one person.

 

[megapenguinx]

Go with World at War seriously. It's the best s*** you'll get out of Wii. It's not half bad either. If you debate me on that then your obviously a 360 addict that has his/her eyes taped to the t.v. screen. But any way World at War is really fun on Wii (if you like wii) It's like a last resort. Like me I tried to get it for my PC (which is s***) so it failed. So I got it for my Wii. Which I don't regret. I only regret the fact that I bought something in which Treyarch didn't put enough planing or effort in to it.

Or you are just a Wii fanboy trying to defend the shitty graphics of your console.

There are NO goods games for the Wii, and graphics are everything.
Hi-five my like minded brother.

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

 

[julesville]

While playing metroid, i found the most effective way to play was to... *gasp* stand up!
I'm with you on the mouse control thing. Computer shooters are so much easier to aim with!

Halfbreed: yes, a cookie should be plenty. Make it peanut butter.

I have no legssssssssssssss just kidding that's a horrible thing to joke about I'm going to hell.

But mouse control is definitely better for shooters.

Truthfully, I've never been a fan of shooters until they became more prominent on the consoles. GASP, I know, what a noob right? But I just never really could get into them on the computer, hunched over your screen with one hand on the mouse, the other on the arrow keys, but then frantically searching for the right key to change weapons, to jump, to crouch, etc. Controllers made it easier, some would say dumbed-down, but it just made me like shooters better if everything was on one little device.

 

[dontworryaboutit]

Yeah I'm not trying to rip on the idea or anything, I just find that I absolutely cannot play a shooting game on the Wii. I just...can't do it. I mean I sometimes find trouble playing shooters that lack mouse control, but this is something completely different.

While playing metroid, i found the most effective way to play was to... *gasp* stand up!
I'm with you on the mouse control thing. Computer shooters are so much easier to aim with!

Halfbreed: yes, a cookie should be plenty. Make it peanut butter.

I have no legssssssssssssss just kidding that's a horrible thing to joke about I'm going to hell.

But mouse control is definitely better for shooters.

While pc's are the master fps race, I have a lot more fun shooting with the Wii than fumbling the xbox like a robot prostitute.

I can play some shooters on xbox it just takes me a while to adjust to the controls.

I have no legssssssssssssss just kidding that's a horrible thing to joke about I'm going to hell.

But mouse control is definitely better for shooters.

To hell with you!

I've had people argue console control is better because you pull a trigger to shoot, making it more realistic, and much better.
The worst part is it's been more than one person.

May God forgive us for we know not what we do.

 

[dontworryaboutit]

While playing metroid, i found the most effective way to play was to... *gasp* stand up!
I'm with you on the mouse control thing. Computer shooters are so much easier to aim with!

Halfbreed: yes, a cookie should be plenty. Make it peanut butter.

I have no legssssssssssssss just kidding that's a horrible thing to joke about I'm going to hell.

But mouse control is definitely better for shooters.

Truthfully, I've never been a fan of shooters until they became more prominent on the consoles. GASP, I know, what a noob right? But I just never really could get into them on the computer, hunched over your screen with one hand on the mouse, the other on the arrow keys, but then frantically searching for the right key to change weapons, to jump, to crouch, etc. Controllers made it easier, some would say dumbed-down, but it just made me like shooters better if everything was on one little device.

You is not a noob sir. It all comes down to opinion.

Edit: That was supposed to be an addition to my previous post. Guess I fucked that up.

 

[A Playful Shark]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

 

[balimuzz]

The Conduit is coming next month, which will support online, competitive multiplayer. I really hope that it's good.

 

[A Playful Shark]

The Conduit is coming next month, which will support online, competitive multiplayer. I really hope that it's good.

The wikipedia article was linked earlier in the thread, if you haven't seen it.

Yeah, it looks pretty good.

 

[julesville]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

Some day there's going be a game with graphics so gorgeous and breath-taking, story so compelling and intelligent, and gameplay so fun and engrossing you'll finish the game in one-sitting to find several days have passed and you're anorexic. It's destiny, the game messiah will arrive, and everyone's opinion of it will be the same: Awesome! If it happens this generation... it will most likely be on PS3...

 

[A Playful Shark]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

Some day there's going be a game with graphics so gorgeous and breath-taking, story so compelling and intelligent, and gameplay so fun and engrossing you'll finish the game in one-sitting to find several days have passed and you're anorexic. It's destiny, the game messiah will arrive, and everyone's opinion of it will be the same: Awesome! If it happens this generation... it will most likely be on PS3...

Considering the trend of either re-releasing the same game over and over, or releasing complete shit... i don't see that happening.

 

[Halfbreed13]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

Some day there's going be a game with graphics so gorgeous and breath-taking, story so compelling and intelligent, and gameplay so fun and engrossing you'll finish the game in one-sitting to find several days have passed and you're anorexic. It's destiny, the game messiah will arrive, and everyone's opinion of it will be the same: Awesome! If it happens this generation... it will most likely be on PS3...

BLASPHEMY
PC

 

[A Playful Shark]

I see this thread has been thoroughly derailed.
Thank you console wars!

 

[TheSapphireKnight]

Medal of Honor Heroes 2 has great controls and supports 32 players online and it looks pretty good to boot.

 

[balimuzz]

The Conduit is coming next month, which will support online, competitive multiplayer. I really hope that it's good.

The wikipedia article was linked earlier in the thread, if you haven't seen it.

Yeah, it looks pretty good.

I played it at Comic Con and it handles really well. It looks really good for a Wii game as well, and there are explosions and enemies everywhere, but all running smoothly.

 

[julesville]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

Some day there's going be a game with graphics so gorgeous and breath-taking, story so compelling and intelligent, and gameplay so fun and engrossing you'll finish the game in one-sitting to find several days have passed and you're anorexic. It's destiny, the game messiah will arrive, and everyone's opinion of it will be the same: Awesome! If it happens this generation... it will most likely be on PS3...

BLASPHEMY
PC

There will be disbeleivers! Judas's will plot against it. Peter (Molyneux) will deny he knows it, but it will come! But, yeah... it could be on the PC.

 

[Zersy]

I think WaW has co=op on wii, but its bad...Really bad

Oh god... tell me it isn't split screen.

No its more unique, and by unique I mean crappy. The game has player 1 plays as a character and player 2 is just shooting as an arrow.

Player 1 is the player, player 2 is the crosshair(yellow)

IT SUCKS

OMG ! thats just bad all over, seriously !

nintendo really need to start thinking a bit

 

[0p3rati0n]

Woah woah woah there are good games for the Wii. Madworld? No More Heroes anyone? Graphics are nothing, I mean look at Crysis. Beautiful yet dumb (much like most of the things on the PS3 gaming lineup...)

It's interesting how you defend the Wii in the console wars then bash the ps3.
Jesus people. get over it.

I have to admit though, Crysis is jaw dropping untill you see your first bug... which takes around five minutes.

newsflash- I didn't write that! recheck on who your quoting!

 

[neoman10]

Go with World at War seriously. It's the best s*** you'll get out of Wii. It's not half bad either. If you debate me on that then your obviously a 360 addict that has his/her eyes taped to the t.v. screen. But any way World at War is really fun on Wii (if you like wii) It's like a last resort. Like me I tried to get it for my PC (which is s***) so it failed. So I got it for my Wii. Which I don't regret. I only regret the fact that I bought something in which Treyarch didn't put enough planing or effort in to it.

Or you are just a Wii fanboy trying to defend the shitty graphics of your console.

hey, hey.

360/ps3 troll. The grownups are talking. Hush up.

A wii fanboy being a grownup that hard to believe

nice

 

[BolognaBaloney]

If they made a Mario FPS, something inoffesive like Mario Paintball or a Mario FPS that had you throwing fireballs and hammers at people, would anyone play it? Or rather, would anyone be really REALLY excited about it?

Ouch...that idea made the fun center of my brain hurt

 

[BolognaBaloney]

Go with World at War seriously. It's the best s*** you'll get out of Wii. It's not half bad either. If you debate me on that then your obviously a 360 addict that has his/her eyes taped to the t.v. screen. But any way World at War is really fun on Wii (if you like wii) It's like a last resort. Like me I tried to get it for my PC (which is s***) so it failed. So I got it for my Wii. Which I don't regret. I only regret the fact that I bought something in which Treyarch didn't put enough planing or effort in to it.

Or you are just a Wii fanboy trying to defend the shitty graphics of your console.

hey, hey.

360/ps3 troll. The grownups are talking. Hush up.

A wii fanboy being a grownup that hard to believe

nice

Hahaha very nice.... give that man a dollar and a cigar