None the less, a group that subdues its critics with terror tactics is no better than Scientology and Islamic fundamentalists. We can criticise our leaders, the Christian religion and internet forums, but Scientology, Islam and Anonymous are exempt from the same freedoms of speech? Because they intimidate us? That's my point. Just because anonymous attacks some who impinge on others' freedoms doesn't make their hypocrisy tolerable.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:The main core of Anonymous makes more attacks against anti-freedom of speech acts, such as with the Australian government.Wicky_42 said:The people here going with the 'don't mess with them' stance are EXACTLY the same as people who back down in the face of terrorist threats. No matter how you look at it, anonymous is known for its terror tactics. Just because they're harder to find doesn't make their attacks against freedoms of speech any more forgiveable.
That being said, its ambiguity (as their statement says, the members have massively differing views) makes it a little harder to pin the blame on than "Bomb the west" fundamentalists.
Ah yes - they were vulnerable to begin with, so driving them over the edge doesn't really count! In fact, it should be almost compulsory to find depressed people and rub in just how shit their life really is. After all, they already had issues, it's not like you're doing anything of consequence. *roll eyes*JEBWrench said:Anyone who killed themselves over prank phone calls (which is in actuality the worst that Anonymous have ever done) had some issues to begin with.Wicky_42 said:But as pointed out before, they have driven vulnerable people to suicide and can cause real-world damage to your life through incriminating you, destroying your credit rating and getting you fired. They are also known to disable websites for periods. Those are all still attacks. It's still a form of terrorism.
Remember the last time Fox did a story on 4chan? Good times.JonnoStrife said:OH yeah baby. Big time.Jiraiya72 said:Yes, you should. Insulting Anonymous is a terrible idea for anyone.
By any chance is this your friend? Or is this they type of video he made?Jack and Calumon said:I'm going out for a meal tonight to celebrate my 16th Birthday, and I am taking two friends. One of them goes on the internet frequently, and after making one Youtube video insulting 4chan, he was attacked by anonymous.
Ever since he has been afraid. He always thinks that people are trying to get him, and when he saw a Scientology Protest in Birmingham once, he almost cried.
I need some advice for him. I started going on 4Chan shortly after this incident and found it was the worst place ever (Mainly /b/).My original plan was to show him that they just responded to criticism, but no such luck. My plan made things worse.
Calumon: The friend is not me or Jack. We need some advice for him...
Should we also fear Anonymous?
![]()
Anonymous is what is known as the most cruel group of individuals in existence. Mainly on things like the Chan websites, they describe themselves as the owners of the internet. Why? Because of all the destruction they have wrought on people.
To describe what they did, let me explain.
They first did the small things, Passive aggressive comments on the video and his channel. No biggy.
The hate mail came next. Again no biggy.
Then came the hackings, the photo's which never existed. Somehow, even though he has never put a picture of himself online, someone found one, and they released it with the words.
"We Know you."
Later came the phone calls, the calls at the door and once a package came with a guy fawkes mask inside that appeared to have been bled upon.
He still gets something every now and again a year on. A reminder of what he did.
Insulted the most dangerous people on the Web.
And by the way, he has abandoned both Youtube account and e-mail and somehow, they have still found him. The words "You cannot hide from Anonymous." Is often sent to him.
Scientology is exempt? They're ridiculed the most. The army of unprincipled lawyers doesn't stop that many people.Wicky_42 said:None the less, a group that subdues its critics with terror tactics is no better than Scientology and Islamic fundamentalists. We can criticise our leaders, the Christian religion and internet forums, but Scientology, Islam and Anonymous are exempt from the same freedoms of speech? Because they intimidate us? That's my point. Just because anonymous attacks some who impinge on others' freedoms doesn't make their hypocrisy tolerable.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:The main core of Anonymous makes more attacks against anti-freedom of speech acts, such as with the Australian government.Wicky_42 said:The people here going with the 'don't mess with them' stance are EXACTLY the same as people who back down in the face of terrorist threats. No matter how you look at it, anonymous is known for its terror tactics. Just because they're harder to find doesn't make their attacks against freedoms of speech any more forgiveable.
That being said, its ambiguity (as their statement says, the members have massively differing views) makes it a little harder to pin the blame on than "Bomb the west" fundamentalists.
I know Jack is British, so I'd assume not.Marik2 said:By any chance is this your friend? Or is this they type of video he made?
Oh my god. That kid, he is just... Sweet Jesus, he needs some luck.Marik2 said:By any chance is this your friend? Or is this they type of video he made?
We are Anonymous.Jack and Calumon said:Insulted the most dangerous people on the Web.
And by the way, he has abandoned both Youtube account and e-mail and somehow, they have still found him. The words "You cannot hide from Anonymous." Is often sent to him.
BiscuitTrouser said:Isn't this illegal?! Seriously harassment and threats are punishable by law no? No one is anonymous on the internet. No one. Get the police involved. Lets see how tough they are against the law. I have no idea WHY he hasnt called the police.
That's kinda the point. Despite their legal actions, most people still freely ridicule them. We don't let them get away with their silencing of public critics, but we'll turn a blind eye to 4chan because they scare us? Kinda pre-school psychology here :/Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:Scientology is exempt? They're ridiculed the most. The army of unprincipled lawyers doesn't stop that many people.Wicky_42 said:None the less, a group that subdues its critics with terror tactics is no better than Scientology and Islamic fundamentalists. We can criticise our leaders, the Christian religion and internet forums, but Scientology, Islam and Anonymous are exempt from the same freedoms of speech? Because they intimidate us? That's my point. Just because anonymous attacks some who impinge on others' freedoms doesn't make their hypocrisy tolerable.Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:The main core of Anonymous makes more attacks against anti-freedom of speech acts, such as with the Australian government.Wicky_42 said:The people here going with the 'don't mess with them' stance are EXACTLY the same as people who back down in the face of terrorist threats. No matter how you look at it, anonymous is known for its terror tactics. Just because they're harder to find doesn't make their attacks against freedoms of speech any more forgiveable.
That being said, its ambiguity (as their statement says, the members have massively differing views) makes it a little harder to pin the blame on than "Bomb the west" fundamentalists.
And I don't like to exempt anything when I criticise. Anonymous just never usually comes up in conversation.
Oh christ, how could I have forgotten that?JEBWrench said:Shit, did anyone post the correct answer here yet?
Buy a dog.
Indeed they are, not all anon are bad I shall state that now unfortunately some as stated earlier in the thread act out and brand themselves anon to cause general bleh for them essentially. The ones that are at the protests are pretty awesome, good sense of humour and generally tolerable human beings.Zeithri said:I probably have without noticing.Martin Owlbury said:Have you ever met one in person and actually talked to one?Zeithri said:ANON is an enemy to everyone.Kajin said:Never make an enemy of someone who previously had no reason to bother you and that won't be much of a problem.Zeithri said:I see.
I'll just say this:
Never bend to an enemy.
Therefore, everyone should make them their enemy in order to root them out.
In my mind, they're just the average joe.