Maybe you just have to stop looking at whatever the most best-selling game is and then condemn the whole industry based on it's problems? Look at the amount of creativity and innovation in PSN and XBLA games. They use heavily symbolic and simple graphics, and often tell artful stories and have a sense of fun.
But it's far easier to decry the industry solely on it's bestsellers, isn't it? Really, though, that's like me saying that all movies either have giant blue people and try to preach to me, or have giant robots and suck, based on a few popular recent movies. Does that make any sense? No?
And even then, many people like these games. Instead of playing the PSN or XBLA or indie PC games, and letting them have their fun, it's necessary that they stop having fun, damn it, and enjoy some quality games. It doesn't matter if they'd rather play realistic shooters, because they aren't arty!
Maybe I'm over reacting, but there's a whole market full of games that you said aren't maid anymore, and the thesis statement of your OP seems to be "everyone doesn't have fun the way I do, so lets make games the way I want, and not have any compromise."
But it's far easier to decry the industry solely on it's bestsellers, isn't it? Really, though, that's like me saying that all movies either have giant blue people and try to preach to me, or have giant robots and suck, based on a few popular recent movies. Does that make any sense? No?
And even then, many people like these games. Instead of playing the PSN or XBLA or indie PC games, and letting them have their fun, it's necessary that they stop having fun, damn it, and enjoy some quality games. It doesn't matter if they'd rather play realistic shooters, because they aren't arty!
Maybe I'm over reacting, but there's a whole market full of games that you said aren't maid anymore, and the thesis statement of your OP seems to be "everyone doesn't have fun the way I do, so lets make games the way I want, and not have any compromise."