AC10 said:
I agree with the SC2 thing.
"We can't fit all on one Disc!"
"By the way, did we mention the campaign is 4/5ths filler crap that has nothing to do with the main story?"
I...
I'm so glad I'm not into that whole internet justice thing anymore. This would have killed my night.
It wasn't a great game (I don't really get that feeling from anything anymore), but 4/5ths of it being "filler crap" is pretty ambitious commentary. Makes it sound like you never played the original.
It's as big as Starcraft 1. The expansion will probably be as big or bigger than Starcraft: Brood Wars.
Then they'll have a 3rd expansion.
Something like 10 years and they've managed to add ONE expansion to the formula. Feels like they should be given a medal, frankly.
They didn't string along half the characters as DLC either.
Buuuuut...not a big deal. The game is out, the past won't change, and a couple random smucks on the Escapist aren't going to make them suddenly change.
Yureina said:
...I saw how they were going to suck the fun out of playing my Holy Priest that I finally realized that WoW no longer had anything fun for me anymore. And so I quit then before another expansion pack threatened to steal another 2 years of my life.
Their greatest mistake. Assuming that the loud minority represented the silent Majority.
So few people wanted unfun hardcore no-second chances content. They went balls to the walls with it and have suffered greatly.
Now people ask themselves "Why do I play?" for the first time, and the answer is the same for WoW as for any other MMO "I don't know."
I'm saying that going off the subscription numbers and how most MMO's end up F2P and just filling a niche market instead of being mainstream.
I'm sure before December of this year SW:TOR will announce they are going F2P because of issues. (I realize numbers don't support that now, but its an inevitable shift, these things have melted most of their flavor because developers don't seem to grasp the idea of adding fun silly extras to keep people entertained in between the mindless grind).
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
I disagree on the SCII thing. Having played it, I feel the 60 dollar price tag is more than justified. If the other parts are the same, I do not see a problem. You are still getting more than enough bang for your buck, and when you take a look at how much work went into them, 3 parts at 60 dollars each seems fair.
Other than that, I do agree. Blizzard have become exceptionally greedy. Theres nothing inherently wrong with that, they exist to make money, after all, its just that their greed has started to negatively affect their games. And that, for me at least, is the point where its time to write a developer off.
To be fair, strict capitalism is not a requirement. A business can exist for many things besides profits. They can be a pleasant side effect of the other activities.
Now publicly traded companies only have one goal, if they wish to survive. Which is probably why I don't like the stock market or Public Companies.
Is Activision/Blizzard Public? I don't even know...if they are ignore my point since they are for money strictly then

.