I said it when I heard about this months ago, and I'm saying it again now. The woman was in the wrong all along. If I recall correctly, she was trespassing on his property, in the early hours of the morning, with a child of around 5 years old. She had to be on his property in order to see it anyway, according to the possible view of where the naked dude was.
So, questions remain. Why was she on his property anyway? Apparently she was using it as a shortcut, which is still trespass. Why was she on a walk in the early hours of the morning, like 3am or something? And why was there a kid with her? And why did she look into the house anyway?
If I was the naked dude, I would now be preparing to file a lawsuit against her for trespass, invasion of privacy, harassment, libel, and anything else I could think of and feasibly work into said lawsuit. And she'd deserve to get her ass handed to her on a plate, too

.