Nannies Get Angry Over Dante's Inferno Achievement

Recommended Videos

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
Between the bad nanny achievement and that comment about the unbaptized babies ending up in hell, and the baby killing in general, this game is just a melting pot of offensive themes

seriously, some people wouldn't be offended by any of that (I am not really offended, except maybe for the baptism thing) but this company deserves ALL of the shit it's getting, for being too STUPID to realize that a good amount of people would be offended by these themes

I mean really, EA: "Play our game, kill a bunch of babies!"
EA: "Hmm, we put our best analyst on it, and we just can't figure out why people are offended, I mean, what could possibly be causing this? Maybe its a subliminal thing, we should try changing the color scheme and see if that changes it"
 

person427

New member
May 28, 2009
538
0
0
If they're gonna complain they might as well build a time machine and stop Dante from writing the book. Do they not realize that this game is based off of a book. An anti-christian book from hundreds of years ago? And that the main character is in Hell, showing that it's bad to kill the babies?
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Truthfully I am hoping Dante's Inferno sets new records for "M" rated games, but I am sort of doubing EA has the guts.

Right now on Gamefaqs there is a discussion about how one key element of Dante's Inferno is that they have the "Prophet" Mohammad being eternally tortured for being a divisive heretic where in his part of hell demons run around with giant swords, cut everyone in half, wait for them to reform, and then do it again.

All discussion aside, keep in mind this is a Christian version of Hell, which means that Mohammad has to be a liar. However given the way people walk on eggshells around Muslims (when really we should be doing the opposite in a general sense) there is some question as to whether this will be in the game.

Ironically (as I said on Gamefaqs) I've played several games like Shin Megami Tensei titles where the enemy was basically God. I'm a Christian (albeit not a deeply spiritual one) and can take this kind of thing as fantasy if it tells a decent story. I personally don't think God (as I believe in him) would be offended to be used this way in what is overall a positive message... and frankly everyone no matter how pious questions faith, and this kind of thing is simply a way of raising some of those questions... but whatever, this isn't about Christianity... more than to say "so what, with a seperation of church and state, no religion should be exempt for purposes of political correctness".

As it is though I half expect when Dante's inferno comes out it will be greatly watered down, and pretty much devoid of the usage of any historical or spiritual figures that could be seen as politically incorrect.

I find this sad, as I've been sort of a fan of the usage of "Hell" as an adventure setting in one way or another. Looking back to the very old "Heroes In Hell" shared world Anthology (people give the Devil a very rough time in that), Edward Lee's "City Infernal" trilogy, and of course the ancient game "Escape From Hell" which used the old Wasteland engine. It was an RPG where you could recruit people fictional and historical to help you rescue your friends and escape the underworld after accidently casting a spell of damnation. You pretty much start out recruiting Stalin and Ghengis Khan, and can recruit a bunch of people ranging from Doctor Jeckyll, Shakespearean characters, or even Adolf Hitler (who is sort of fighting a rebellion against the devil as I remember, he's one of the last people you can recruit, and one of the best equipped, but you can't use him long since you need to have your two friends in your party when you finally fight the devil and escape). Sadly I don't think I'll ever be able to get that one to run again. If you like experimenting with old games check it out on some old Abandonware sites, it's quite fun, and Gamefaqs has a decent walkthrough. :)
 

GrinningManiac

New member
Jun 11, 2009
4,090
0
0
This is sick.

Don't get me wrong, violence is fun in games, but this is just stupid. It's the gaming equivelant of a child with a red crayong scribbling a massive dirty circle on the wall.

"Killing Unbaptised Babies"...Oh yeah, GREAT...a perfect way to just turn the horrors of the Divine Comedy into a gaming gimmick with gross-out humour, whilst aggravating anyone with any sense of decency.

I can laugh when someone in Fallout 3 erupts violently, but getting an acheivement for killing babies in hell? Come on! that's just really, really childish
 

annoyinglizardvoice

New member
Apr 29, 2009
1,024
0
0
This all makes me think of Caboose from RvB, both because of the supidity of it and because of the power his hatred of babies gives him.
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
I am content to just watch the "Think of the Children" moral watchdogs and the "We'll screw you all over" commercialized publishing giant fight. It's hilarious--just sitting back, putting my hands behind my head, and observing from a distance these ridiculous gladiatorial politics. Watching two organizations I could care less about tearing each other to bits. The protests, the automated responses, the indignant sycophants, it's all just...funny.
 

aaronmcc

New member
Oct 18, 2008
629
0
0
gibboss28 said:
In defence of the achievement..if you're a nanny and a large number of babies have died under your watch then...yeah I'd call that a bad nanny.
This.

I mean, the babies are already dead anyhow. You aren't actually killing them... technically.
 

ReverseEngineered

Raving Lunatic
Apr 30, 2008
444
0
0
Why does every group in the world think that a video game making a passing reference at their industry somehow hurts their reputation?

It's "Bad Nanny". Not "Nanny" or even "The Best Nanny". It's not saying that nannies kill babies -- it's a joke about how a person who could result in that many infant mortalities would be the worst nanny ever. I don't even know why I'm bothering to try and explain the joke -- it's a fuckin' joke.

We've been over this before. Studies have been done. Most of the evidence points the other way -- violent video games don't make people violent. If the game says to kill "virtual babies", then you do so. That doesn't mean you go around killing real babies, as if that somehow was going to give you real life experience (well, maybe it would -- I've never experienced a federal prison before).

Can we please just see a joke for what it is? Laugh, make your point that you don't condone it, and walk away. Don't go preaching about the game as if it were a "murder simulator" and try to get it banned.

First Nigerians, now nannies. Who's next? Can we just offend everybody at once by making an achievement for killing x humans? Maybe throw in some animals too, since PETA cares more about the animals than themselves. Yeah, that's right, now they can release a statement saying how I've offended them. Laugh.
 

Snowalker

New member
Nov 8, 2008
1,937
0
0
UnHoly Dead Babies!... Bad Nannies... The game just sold its self.. and people are pissed at it?, Just means its going to be more fun.
 

RoseBridge

New member
Oct 27, 2009
138
0
0
Haha thats rich though I feel like the group angry should be like the baby lovers association or whatever, I dont rember exactly but wasn't there an achievment in Dead Space for kicking the necromorph babies?
 

Merteg

New member
May 9, 2009
1,579
0
0
Ummmmm, does anyone care what what these nannies have to say about video games?

Though, this turn of events has made Dante's Inferno a little more interesting in my eyes.
 

Captain Blackout

New member
Feb 17, 2009
1,056
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
I'm still annoyed at the back-alley molestation of the source material, but that's just me.
Dead babies are alright in my book.
I read this, went WTF?, looked again at the pic and thought that's cool art. Then I saw the name. Nice avatar you freak. At least I feel better you said it before anyone else. My universe works better knowing you're out there.
 

Captain Blackout

New member
Feb 17, 2009
1,056
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
Captain Blackout said:
I read this, went WTF?, looked again at the pic and thought that's cool art. Then I saw the name. Nice avatar you freak. At least I feel better you said it before anyone else. My universe works better knowing you're out there.
Glad to hear it, but...
It's my universe.

You just live in it.
I was referring to my personal universe as opposed to the universe at large. I wasn't making a claim of ownership. Do you own all the universes? Should we all be worried about having Max running rampant through our personal biochemical virtual realities messing with the fixtures? That could be better than the drugs I've been taking...

And if I just live in my own universe does that make me a recursive being and should Max be afraid of my universe in it's Lovecraftian states?