Natural shooter multiplayer?
- Thread starter concrete89
- Start date
Recommended Videos
sgtshock said:
OT: Real firefights involve standing in cover hoping to fuck no one hits you. Then there's the feeling of fear whenever you lean to shoot because remember kids, you can actually die in real firefights. There's no "FUCKPISSASSSHIT, RESPAWN ME FASTER!" crap going on in firefights, it's just you, a gun and a whole load of bullets just waiting to hit you.
I honestly don't know how soldiers can do it. I couldn't cope with the amount of fear I'd feel whenever I'd start getting shot at.
If video games will ever be able to simulate such a feeling then by God will I buy that game in no time. The current technology, however, cannot produce such a shooter. I guess we'll have to be happy with BF:BC2 for now since it's the only realistic-ish orientated shooter coming out.
Yeah RO is fun. I'm absolute rubbish at it but I still find myself enjoying running around and ambushing enemies. Nothing I have ever doen in MW2 has been as satisfying as sneaking through enemy lines in RO and methodically eliminating enemy troops.Furburt said:
That and melee is insanely balanced. Sure the Bayonet can kill in one or two stabs, but try stabbing a guy with a PP7 or a MP40 and you are one bullet ridden corpse. Don't even get me started on rifle butting people...
Wouldn't they take way less than they do already?Onyx Oblivion said:
OT: you can't make people feel fear in an online deathmatch with other people. In a single player environment it's possible, but with other people, on a game, there is no fear.
In fact, a game like that would be no fun anyway, so I don't wanna.
Imagine it you were the first guy who died, and you had to sit there and watch. And watch. And watch. It'd FEEL like forever.FactualSquirrel said:
I thought L4D did a pretty good job of geting people working together and moving as a unit rather than lone wolfing. The realism mode is really brutal, when you die that's it, no respawning for the rest of the game.
Obviously you still get people who rush ahead shot gunning everything until a smoker gets a hold of them and then they die because no one is near enough to rescue him/her in time.
Obviously you still get people who rush ahead shot gunning everything until a smoker gets a hold of them and then they die because no one is near enough to rescue him/her in time.
The OP suggested that you would be forced to quit if you died, although in that case, it would be really boring.Onyx Oblivion said:
My point exactly.Onyx Oblivion said:
It would be no fun, and would not sell among the "hardcore" croud due to the mechanic, nor the "casual" crowd as it's not a sequel.
No company in their right mind would make it.
Play GRAW 2.
People use cover.
Realistic amounts of bullets for deaths.
Guns work how they would.
Its effectivly a simulation rather than a game
People use cover.
Realistic amounts of bullets for deaths.
Guns work how they would.
Its effectivly a simulation rather than a game
To the OP, you already explained the base reason why your question can't be answered:
Players don't behave like they would in real life because there is no fear. It's the same reason that paint-ball can't be compared to real combat tactics. No one would throw their ass to the wind the way that players do in games.
I don't see any way to artificially instill this instinct into a player base outside of extremely harsh dealth penalties, which has only really been done in the oldest MMO's.
Players don't behave like they would in real life because there is no fear. It's the same reason that paint-ball can't be compared to real combat tactics. No one would throw their ass to the wind the way that players do in games.
I don't see any way to artificially instill this instinct into a player base outside of extremely harsh dealth penalties, which has only really been done in the oldest MMO's.
