Netflix Offering $100k Per Episode for Current TV

Recommended Videos

Elizabeth Grunewald

The Pope of Chilitown
Oct 4, 2010
1,096
0
0
Netflix Offering $100k Per Episode for Current TV

Netflix is offering studios up to $100K per episode for permission to stream current episodes of television series, much to the dismay of the networks that now air them.

Netflix is poised to deliver 300 million streams in the upcoming year, all of movies and seasons-past television. CEO Reed Hastings wants to strengthen the company's foothold in television, and has started to talk directly with studios about getting its hands on episodes of currently running seasons of primetime television series. Netflix is reportedly offering studios between $70,000 and $100,000 per episode to gain access to current programming.

That Netflix is going directly to the studios, rather than broadcast networks, means trouble for those networks. A third-party service streaming current television could be a sizable threat in a rapidly evolving entertainment industry. This has produced a debate over who owns streaming rights. The New York Post supplies both sides of the debate, noting "the studios that supply the networks with shows argue they own the streaming rights to in-season shows." The Post continues "but the broadcast networks that make a profit from repeats -- and stand to lose audiences, ad dollars and syndication revenue if viewers can see those same episodes on Netflix -- argue they control the rights."

Netflix has recently announced a streaming-only service at $7.99 per month. This puts them at the same price point as Hulu Plus, which streams current episodes of selected series. Hulu is able to stream this content because it is actually jointly owned by the NBC, ABC, and Fox television networks. While Netflix does not currently have access to this timely content, it is the only streaming service of the two, for the moment, that can be viewed on a gaming device, as it allows viewers to stream television on a PlayStation 3, Xbox, or Wii.

All of this only applies to television viewers in the United States for the time being, but one of the speculative reasons for introducing the streaming-only Netflix option was that shipping discs internationally was difficult. Following that logic, one hopes that Netflix will soon bring their streaming services to countries outside the US, as they did in Canada earlier this year.


Source: The Hollywood Reporter [http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/primetime_netflix_OMIP3b4KmH8odXiLSickCN]

Permalink
 

Kenster362

New member
Dec 1, 2010
2
0
0
As most, I'm all for this. Not only will it be a great bargain if it goes through, it will add even more competition to the mix, and that means the consumer wins in the end.
 

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
My children will never experience a world where some program director controlled your schedule. There is will be no "prime time" anymore and this is a wonderful thing.

The whole entire network system is slowly but inevitably crumbling. Eventually there will be no middlemen between consumers and producers.
 

Kavic86

New member
May 28, 2010
68
0
0
Great Netflix just gain more good rep for going straight to the studios and bypassing the networks.
 

Jkudo

New member
Aug 17, 2010
304
0
0
rembrandtqeinstein said:
My children will never experience a world where some program director controlled your schedule. There is will be no "prime time" anymore and this is a wonderful thing.

The whole entire network system is slowly but inevitably crumbling. Eventually there will be no middlemen between consumers and producers.
When can we get rid of publishers?
 

TaboriHK

New member
Sep 15, 2008
811
0
0
This is a brilliant move. I don't have cable so I've been using Amazon's video-on-demand. If it were on Netflix for free, believe me would I be plugging the crap out of Netflix to all my friends.
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
Elizabeth Grunewald said:
Netflix has recently announced a streaming-only service at $7.99 per month. This puts them at the same price point as Hulu Plus, which streams current episodes of selected series. Hulu is able to stream this content because it is actually jointly owned by the NBC, ABC, and Fox television networks. While Netflix does not currently have access to this timely content, it is the only streaming service of the two, for the moment, that can be viewed on a gaming device, as it allows viewers to stream television on a PlayStation 3, Xbox, or Wii.
This is actually false. I've been watching Hulu Plus on my PS3 since August.
 

unoleian

New member
Jul 2, 2008
1,332
0
0
I cannot justify the cost of basic cable. Premium cable? Don't even get me started.

Netflix is simply amazing. If they added streaming for current shows, I'd be worried if I was a broadcast network, too. The advertising is getting prohibitive. When a full quarter or more of an hour block is devoted simply to advertising, it becomes a turn-off (literally) for me.

I haven't had television for two years, now. Why would I?
(Okay, I'll be honest. I really miss Jeopardy. That's it.)
 

VanityGirl

New member
Apr 29, 2009
3,472
0
0
Please get current stuff netflix! I don't always get to watch new TV shows (like my precious Mythbusters) and I want to see them! Please let this happen.

teutonicman said:
This might actually get me to subscribe to netflicks, especially if they get Dexter.
They have some seasons of Dexter on Netflix now. Netflix got me hooked on Dexter.
 

therandombear

Elite Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,649
0
41
Would be great if Netflix could decide if they are going to be available here or not, seriously, missing out on shit load of stuff from XBL, indy games, netflix and other stuff, to late to remember now :p
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Lets see...
100k per episode...4-8 episodes per month per show...(assuming that each show airs at least once per week, like, say, Burn Notice or CSI)

So, assuming each user watches these shows, Netflix will need about 50,000 to 100,000 subscribers per show to break even in subscription fees alone.

Hmm. Not too bad actually. For Netflix.
 

Rocketboy13

New member
Oct 21, 2008
149
0
0
I wonder then how shows which cost 1,000,000$ or more to produce will work. The Producers aren't going to let that go to a stream based because the advertisements pay the salaries of the actors in question. Martin Sheen was earning a million dollars an episode by himself for "The West Wing". How could anyone afford to create TV for 100,000$ an episode? Will the show get a royalty from Netflix per viewing?
 

cjb909

New member
Oct 23, 2009
9
0
0
Heroes was doing this last season on Netflix. A day or too after the newest episode aired, it would show up on Netflix.
 

Stoic raptor

New member
Jul 19, 2009
1,636
0
0
I fucking love netflix.

About 2 weeks ago, we canceled our cable and got netflix. Best decision ever.

We watch so many movies. And they even have t.v. too. Not currant episodes but still.
Watching then instantly right on the ps3.

This would make netflix even more better than it is.
 

Stoic raptor

New member
Jul 19, 2009
1,636
0
0
Straying Bullet said:
- No friggin' ads.
I doubt it. Right now there is no ads. But if they do get current episodes, then I guess ads would get on netflix. Either way, netflix will get ads soon if it keeps growing.
It is kind of inevitable.
 

The Random One

New member
May 29, 2008
3,310
0
0
Maybe when this comes around I'll start watching TV again.

Is it weird that I'll pay to watch something that I can get free only so I can watch it at my own pace? It's cheaper than a DVD at least.