it could mean money grubbing but it could also mean that all three races will have a giant campaign to play. So i predict a few several hours per campaign and if it does happen like that i will have no complaints to buying all three.NoMoreSanity said:I don't have a PC, though separating Starcraft 2 into 3 games reeks of money-grubbing.
TRUE!NoMoreSanity said:I don't have a PC, though separating Starcraft 2 into 3 games reeks of money-grubbing.
Its not. Its a new franchise MMO. Nothing related to Stacraft, Warcraft, Diablo even Lost Vikings.herr.Didi said:Diablo 3, hmm that will take a while, we all know how blizzard postpone their games. Also, I heard that they want to make another MMO that has nothing to do with the Warcraft universe, and that in Japan(I might be mistaken), Blizzard tried to buy the rights for Ghost, soo maybe Starcraft MMO?
It really depends of the quality, of said games. If they go with each campaign is as long as Stacraft 1 and as good, the money spent on the 3 parts is good money spent. Also they being released with a year difference from each other, so its not going to suck your money dry as some people think.NoMoreSanity said:I don't have a PC, though separating Starcraft 2 into 3 games reeks of money-grubbing.
And i thought i was the only one who`d noticed the "activision" part of "activision-bliizzard"Lord_Jaroh said:How else is Activision going to happily "exploit" their franchises? Simply make the games they release smaller, make more of them, and charger the same for each one. I hope the Mr. Kotick chokes on one of the quarters that he is biting...
That depends on how long each campaign is, and how expensive each seperate game is. Also don't forget, that you will have all races in the multiplayer. You can just buy 1 of the 3 games and have all your online needs.NoMoreSanity said:I don't have a PC, though separating Starcraft 2 into 3 games reeks of money-grubbing.
Say WHAT?! Have you never heard of Starcraft, the Warcraft series and the Diablo series?! Plus, Blizzard had nothing to do with Hellgate.Stevedave00 said:Ignoring the redundant bandwagon that is "Activision" hate that seems to be pretty hip at the moment,Blizzard hasn't done well outside of WoW.
Hellgate London came out a while back and is well, utter crap.
I'm not really expecting much from them.
Uhm hellgate was made by Flagship studios, not blizzard.Stevedave00 said:Ignoring the redundant bandwagon that is "Activision" hate that seems to be pretty hip at the moment,Blizzard hasn't done well outside of WoW.
Hellgate London came out a while back and is well, utter crap.
I'm not really expecting much from them.
I think Blizzard proved that was their plan with WoW.NoMoreSanity said:I don't have a PC, though separating Starcraft 2 into 3 games reeks of money-grubbing.
Does anyone remember the old days, when Blizzard was still the good guy?TehMan said:There are some new games that blizzard is making and i would like to talk about them. specifically Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3