Next Gen is now out and its a massive 'meh' for both consoles

Recommended Videos

WeepingAngels

New member
May 18, 2013
1,722
0
0
insertcleverphrase said:
Ed130 said:
TelHybrid said:
Optical media will gradually cease to be used for games.
I doubt it, as long as the likes of Gamestop and trade-ins exist digital distribution for consoles will remain an afterthought for many.

Which would an average consumer perfer? Going to a shop for a $40 game with the ablity to get some credit back if the game is ass or spend $60, eat up a hefty chunk of bandwidth and no ablity to exchange?
Well yeah, so long as the console makers keep being asshats and don't introduce steam style prices and sales on digital games... yeah. Digital SHOULD be cheaper than retail, yet isn't, what gives? just greedyness really, $ony and M$ could have squashed used games ages ago by doing this, yet they haven't. When was the last time you saw PC game disks for sale at retail? You can get them but they are not in nearly the demand that they used to be, and often they will just be the steam version so you don't have to download all of it on bandwidth.
Yeah, fuck those retailers! Oh..but how will we sell consoles if we give a big middle finger to retailers?
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
It's really not that hard to figure out, man. Try putting 2 and 2 together before making ridiculous blanket statements.

The PS3 and 360 have an installed base of almost 150 million combined. No publisher is going to spend tens of millions of dollars on AAA development without tapping that enormous market - not when the next-gen base is something like 4-5 million. Developing exclusively for 8th gen won't be financially viable until the combined user base for PS4 and XB1 is something like 15-30 million.

There was honestly no way the initial round of releases for PS4/XB1 were going to be anything other than a bunch of slightly prettier PS3/360 ports. We honestly won't see anything noteworthy from the next-gen until they completely abandon the last one. At that point, the rising tide should raise all ships - including PCs.
 

TelHybrid

New member
May 16, 2009
1,785
0
0
Ed130 said:
TelHybrid said:
Optical media will gradually cease to be used for games.
I doubt it, as long as the likes of Gamestop and trade-ins exist digital distribution for consoles will remain an afterthought for many.

Which would an average consumer perfer? Going to a shop for a $40 game with the ablity to get some credit back if the game is ass or spend $60, eat up a hefty chunk of bandwidth and no ablity to exchange?
You kinda just sniped all of my points leading up to my theory about pay to play (f2p) games easing people in gradually and becoming the standard payment model.

I think it will take a good long time, but I really think it will happen.

Hell the new consoles have the ability to prevent used games from working without a license purchase, which will be at the discretion of the publisher.
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,099
0
0
Fonejackerjon said:
BOTH the xbox one and PS4 are out and both quite frankly are a resounding 'meh' nothing exciting of ground-breaking from either party and I hear gamers say 'give it time, launch games always suck' to that I say BULLSHIT launch games ALWAYS should show something that the hardware is capable off, but none show next gen quality. PS vita had uncharted golden abyss - amazing looking game, PS3 HAD Resistance it looked awesome, psone had wipeout again MASSIVE leap from SNES.

So what can we hope for? 1080p 60FPS and even that is proving a struggle.

Another argument I'm gonna blow out of the water, 'developers need time to get used to the hardware' REALLY? REALLY its PC hardware!!! developers have been using it for years they have made it as simple as possible for developers and the games do not look that different from last gen.

Gamers seem to be clutching at straws 'the next gen is about bigger and better worlds' there is no proof of this people are buying on blind faith.

I fear the honeymoon period may be over soon, yes both consoles will sell a shit-ton but ONLY to hardcore gamers but in 1 year 2 years or even 3 years something better will come along. They actually NEED the casual gaming market to survive and I dont think they have it this time round

What the big three have failed to realise is that the world will not stand still for them for the next 7-10 years especially now. Sorry if this sounds negative but its the truth.

You know, I was actually hopeful that Kinect 2.0 would bring about a leap in tech. Just read the reviews of fighter within to dash that hope entirely.

I'm not trolling but I just feel in 2013 sticking a $60 disc in a machine while it grinds into action seems like such a dated idea.
Is this your first console launch? Because it sounds like your first console launch.
The xbone and ps4 launch is going exactly how people expected . The community has been talking about this for close to a year now. No one is surprised because we have gone through console launches time and time again. Most games on launch suck, because devs have not had enough time to reach the consoles potential. This is going to be remedied in about 1-2 years , usually around the time when the price drops about 50$-100$.

It happens every time.
 

Neyon

New member
May 3, 2009
124
0
0
Fonejackerjon said:
So what can we hope for? 1080p 60FPS and even that is proving a struggle.

...

Another argument I'm gonna blow out of the water, 'developers need time to get used to the hardware' REALLY? REALLY its PC hardware!!! developers have been using it for years they have made it as simple as possible for developers and the games do not look that different from last gen.
Firstly 1080p @ 60p is possible on the PS4 and Xbone in the exact same way it is possible on the 360 and PS3. Both the 360 and PS3 are capable of rendering at 1080p with 60FPS it is just that designers CHOOSE to make the games look better rather than have them run smoother. There is a trade-off and console developers prefer to add more eye-candy than have better performance or higher resolution, probably because they think console gamers notice eye-candy most. The same has happened with the new consoles and perhaps it will continue that way. Demand all games run at 1080p @60FPS and they will make that a target.

Secondly console devs have not necessarily had years working on PC hardware. They have been programming games for the 360 and PS3 which are fundamentally different from PC architecture. The fact that the coding is taking place on desktops is irrelevant. Even though many console games are ported to PC, especially larger titles, often console developers do the bare minimum, if any optimization for the platform as they deem it secondary and not worth the effort. In short - they aren't used to the architecture. Furthermore while the PS4 and Xbone are related to PC architecture it isn't the same - both are using glorified mobile CPUs.
 

008Zulu_v1legacy

New member
Sep 6, 2009
6,019
0
0
Maximum Bert said:
WiiU is finally looking up with Bayonetta 2
I hope it lives up to the expectations. But to be safe, I intend on waiting a month or two to see the full reaction before breaking my "5 game minimum" rule before buying a console for a single game.

Why I think the New Gen is slower, is because both consoles use HDCP. And all the Let's Play content creators hate it. Sure they said they plan to patch it out, but seriously, if they were truthful then they wouldn't have included that feature to begin with.
 

Bakuryukun

New member
Jul 12, 2010
392
0
0
They've only been out for a little bit, I think it's a bit early to call "meh" on the whole damn thing. Hell I don't even plan on really buying any next gen console until a year or two goes by so that they can actually have games I want on them.
 

FoolKiller

New member
Feb 8, 2008
2,409
0
0
Fonejackerjon said:
PS vita had uncharted golden abyss - amazing looking game, PS3 HAD Resistance it looked awesome, psone had wipeout again MASSIVE leap from SNES.
The VITA is a handheld and other than Uncharted, the launch games were meh. Resistance wasn't that great. And if you had actually played Ghosts and BF4 on the current gen and the next gen you would realize just how much better the graphics are. And really, that is all this seems to be about.

There is also the fact that console gaming is, and has been, super-saturated for quite some time. Add in the fact that this is the first time the two leaders in the field go head to head with launches.


Fonejackerjon said:
I fear the honeymoon period may be over soon, yes both consoles will sell a shit-ton but ONLY to hardcore gamers but in 1 year 2 years or even 3 years something better will come along. They actually NEED the casual gaming market to survive and I dont think they have it this time round
This was the same mentality at the beginning of the previous gen when 360 and PS3 came out. This hypothesis never materialized. You have to understand that consoles serve a niche market with a niche purpose. According to the masses, every misstep taken by them has to do with the fact that they try to change what ain't broke.
Fonejackerjon said:
What the big three have failed to realise is that the world will not stand still for them for the next 7-10 years especially now. Sorry if this sounds negative but its the truth.
Regardless of this being true, you seem to assume that they stand still. They didn't this last gen.

Fonejackerjon said:
You know, I was actually hopeful that Kinect 2.0 would bring about a leap in tech. Just read the reviews of fighter within to dash that hope entirely.
Bad software doesn't make the hardware bad.
Fonejackerjon said:
I'm not trolling but I just feel in 2013 sticking a $60 disc in a machine while it grinds into action seems like such a dated idea.
So are automobiles fueled by petrol...
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Well, there are a few points in terms of graphics.

1) Diminishing returns. We're hitting the point where adding a few more polygons is not going to make a big difference. It's not going to be noticeably better just at a glance.
As a point of fact, just one Helghasht in Killzone: Shadow Fall has 40,000 polygons in it. It looks good, but just glimpsing it probably won't make you think it noticeably better than what a PS3 could do.

2) The systems just came out. There's always a bit of a evolution in terms of graphics. You can expect later games to look better.

3) A lot of current games are available on PS3 and 360. They won't look much better on PS4 or Xbox One. No developer is going to rebuild entire games like that.

Honestly, I don't expect the differences will be highly noticeable in the long run. Likely mostly be textures and particle effects more than anything. A friend of mine even said that he could see the difference in those qualities between the 360 and PS4 version of Battlefield 4.

Oh, also. Graphics aren't everything. I thought graphics were important to games when I was a child. Graphics need to work for the game. Not every game needs to be hyper realistic. It's real premature to be declaring it a lost cause at this point.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
TelHybrid said:
Known as its more marketable term "free to play" or "f2p", this model gives the player a glorified trial version of a game, in which the player's progress is slowed down to turn what should be fun into a test of patience.
This is not true of free to play games that do it right. What you're referring to is more pay to win than anything.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
Saltyk said:
Well, there are a few points in terms of graphics.

1) Diminishing returns. We're hitting the point where adding a few more polygons is not going to make a big difference. It's not going to be noticeably better just at a glance.
As a point of fact, just one Helghasht in Killzone: Shadow Fall has 40,000 polygons in it. It looks good, but just glimpsing it probably won't make you think it noticeably better than what a PS3 could do.
You're making the faulty assumption that better graphics is just about more polygons. It's not, never was, and polygon count hasn't been that important in almost a decade.
 

TelHybrid

New member
May 16, 2009
1,785
0
0
Vivi22 said:
TelHybrid said:
Known as its more marketable term "free to play" or "f2p", this model gives the player a glorified trial version of a game, in which the player's progress is slowed down to turn what should be fun into a test of patience.
This is not true of free to play games that do it right. What you're referring to is more pay to win than anything.
Pay to win. I like that choice of words. :)

Shame that seems to be the standard.
 

Maximum Bert

New member
Feb 3, 2013
2,149
0
0
008Zulu said:
Maximum Bert said:
WiiU is finally looking up with Bayonetta 2
I hope it lives up to the expectations. But to be safe, I intend on waiting a month or two to see the full reaction before breaking my "5 game minimum" rule before buying a console for a single game.

Why I think the New Gen is slower, is because both consoles use HDCP. And all the Let's Play content creators hate it. Sure they said they plan to patch it out, but seriously, if they were truthful then they wouldn't have included that feature to begin with.
If Bayonetta 2 and X turn out to be terrible I will be extremely dissapointed X especially is my most looked forward to game of the coming/current gen games.

I didnt know about HDCP had to look it up it sounds pretty crap and I honestly dont see much reason for it except to piss people off. Im waiting for a sub 200 pound price point on WiiU and a sub 300 pound price point on PS4 and Xbox One or at least close to it. I do get discount so technically the WiiU and PS4 are close enough to my target price but Xbox One is way off which is a shame as Killer Instinct unfinished and content lacking as it is actually looks fun and is the only game I really really want to play on next gen atm.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
Neyon said:
Fonejackerjon said:
So what can we hope for? 1080p 60FPS and even that is proving a struggle.

...

Another argument I'm gonna blow out of the water, 'developers need time to get used to the hardware' REALLY? REALLY its PC hardware!!! developers have been using it for years they have made it as simple as possible for developers and the games do not look that different from last gen.
Firstly 1080p @ 60p is possible on the PS4 and Xbone in the exact same way it is possible on the 360 and PS3. Both the 360 and PS3 are capable of rendering at 1080p with 60FPS it is just that designers CHOOSE to make the games look better rather than have them run smoother. There is a trade-off and console developers prefer to add more eye-candy than have better performance or higher resolution, probably because they think console gamers notice eye-candy most. The same has happened with the new consoles and perhaps it will continue that way. Demand all games run at 1080p @60FPS and they will make that a target.
This is something that people seem to forget, didnt Top Spin 2 run at 1080p at 60FPS on the 360 or something like that?

The games will become more demanding and the devs will start to cut on the framerate and resolution like they have always been, no way they will always try to keep 1080p/60fps in their games.

EDIT: Rayman Origins runs at 1080p on the 360 and PS3 for example
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
sanquin said:
TelHybrid said:
Optical media will gradually cease to be used for games.
I doubt it. And if it does happen it will be VERY gradual. There are still far too many people, me included, that want physical disks. No matter what companies try to force on us.

OT:
I already thought of all 3 consoles as 'meh' even before release. They might have some fun new features and some flashy new menu's and interactive gimmicks. But in the end it's the 'next gen feel' and games that matter. And right now none of the games feel next gen. And the line up for all 3 consoles isn't good enough for me to want to buy any of them either.

I might sound like a PC elitist with this, but I really am glad that I have a PC right now. I can decide how powerful it is, what it can and can't do, and have an overall better selection of games. At least for the moment.
I never used to be a "pc elitist" but they are making it hard for those of us who do have gaming rigs. I can't help but wonder why I would buy a multiplayer game for the console and pay online fees when I can get it for the pc and play online for free.
The problem for years is that the consoles have been taking all of the crappy parts of pc gaming and neglecting to include any of the good features. This next gen seems to just dig them further into that hole.
I'm not saying that there's no way I will get a next gen console but there's going to have to be some really mindblowing exclusives.
 

Black Reaper

New member
Aug 19, 2011
234
0
0
Maximum Bert said:
PS4 has nothing I want at the moment but when Guilty Gear hits I will definitely consider getting one.
The new Guilty Gear will be released for the Ps3 too, and you won't have to pay for the multiplayer if you ever want to play it
 

gargantual

New member
Jul 15, 2013
417
0
0
Fonejackerjon said:
shootthebandit said:
I usually wait about a year before i get a console. its cheaper, all the issues have been ironed out and devs have had time to make good games

considering GTA 5 was released on current gen and gran turismo 6 will be released on PS3 only. These are the only 2 games ive been waiting on for ages and ill get loads of game time out of both of them. considering GT 6 has over 1200 cars (each with unlimited amounts of tweaking) and over 100 circuits (plus user made circuits and an app to track your own GPS data to race routes youve actually driven). Im sure this isnt too exciting if you arent into cars or motor racing but for me this is gonna be amazing.
You make good points, and yes the PS3 had a bad start and had some of the most amazing games this generation but I really cant help but feel its different this time. I still think that in 3-5 years time phone and or tablet will match or even beat the power of the PS4 and xbone and the games will be cheaper and have far more consumer friendly models.

Battlefield 4 $60 plus $35 for season pass and that my friends is the future of the next gen right there to get the FULL intended gaming experience you will be pay $85 per game what idiot in their right mind would do that?
That would have to be one expensive ass future gen phone or tablet. How long would the battery last before it completely crapped out? I think the future would just be streaming media boxes with gaming in them, and the server traffic would be abysmal. This is why I'm interested to see this steam machine idea. We need customized PC media bozes to compete with these other streaming media boxes, and still demonstrate user independence in gaming.
 

KazeAizen

New member
Jul 17, 2013
1,129
0
0
And once again Nintendo gets zero mention in the opening post because everyone is so die hard against them except for I guess a small minority on this site that's been cheekily nicknamed "Nintendo Defense Force".