I really don't feel that Nintendo's censorship really detracted from their overall product. The games were still fun whereas 4kids really butchered the material. REALLY butchered.
All those series done by 4Kids were midhanded, Pokemon included. We lost an entire season's worth of episodes of Yu-Gi-Oh because it was actually pretty damn dark. There was virtually no card playing, and Yugi routinely broke peoples minds and sent their souls to hell.Shoggoth2588 said:As for 4Kids, didn't they straight-up change One Piece? That kind of thing has been done before of course, Our Samurai Pizza Cats is completely different to the source material but if I remember right, One Piece was completely butchered. Yu-Gi-Oh was supposedly neutered too...
Actually I thought Sanji's lolipops were a clever change for younger audiences.MeatMachine said:Oh come now.
Lollipop cigarettes?
Finger guns?
The 10 or so times across multiple anime series where they replaced story-centric dialogue with "I WANT A BACON DOUBLE CHEESEBURGER"?
NOTHING will ever top the ridiculous 4Kids censorship.
Moviebob did an episode about Samurai Pizza Cats for The Escapist covering the story about its releaseShingeki no Gingerbeard said:Samurai Pizza Cats is an interesting tale. It was a Saban dub, not 4Kids, and the original Japanese studio lost most of the original scripts. Saban didn't have anyone in house for translation purposes, so they wrote a brand new script instead to match the visuals. What we got was more-or-less parody, and the Japanese series was played straight. Even the creators admit that SPC was better.
Brock said that right? What on earth was the beef patty and bacon going to be made out of anyway? Miltank and Emboar I suppose. Even as a kid I felt that was silly, even though Pokemon (at that time) had never specifically made it clear that real animals did not exist in the Pokemon world.MeatMachine said:The 10 or so times across multiple anime series where they replaced story-centric dialogue with "I WANT A BACON DOUBLE CHEESEBURGER"?
That's the problem! 4kids more often than not, pandered to sterotypes of children. Never really respecting, or caring about their intelligence. As long as they got their parents money that's all that mattered. I understand censoring Sanji's cigarette, that wouldn't fly the Saturday morning censors in America. But of all things, why a lollipop? Why not a toothpick? It would've been an easier edit job, it would've looked less jarring, and it would've made more sense in context of the character. But apparently 4kids wanted to be cheap.Shingeki no Gingerbeard said:Actually I thought Sanji's lolipops were a clever change for younger audiences.
TheMisterManGuy said:In the 80s and early 90s, Nintendo was notorious for strict censorship policies. Prohibiting things like Blood, extreme violence, gratouitous sex, religion, or use of alcohol or tobacco. While most of these policies were scrapped with the advent of the ESRB, there's still a rare instance were the company makes a minor change or two so that their games can be playable by kids 14 and under, an important demographic for the company.
But in the anime industry, there was a New York-based children's production company that was not only notorious for extreme censorship, but an example of censorship gone wrong. Although 4kids Entertainment no longer exists, their legacy of heavily edited anime dubs forever live on as a source of humor for anime fans. The problem wasn't just that 4kids censored and edited anime, the problem was that they rarely did it well.
They were pretty much the anime equivalent of an overprotective nanny. Always keeping kids in bubble wrap never letting them get exposed to reality. Most of what 4kids aquired was for kids roughly of upper elementary and middle school age (10-15 years old) in Japan. 4kids, seeing the success of Pokémon, felt it was better to target children younger than that. Thus, the removal of blood, any and all fanservice and innuendo (even if its something relativley harmless), dumbed down, pun-filled dialogue that sounds like it was written by 5 year olds, discarding scenes and even entire episodes that were "unimportant to the main story" (Kids are too stupid to get character development or subplots apparently), And even removing text, Japanese culture, guns, and even the concept of death (kids can't know about these things, they're EEEEEVIIIIIILLLLLLLL!!!).
Say what you want about Nintendo's censorship, at least these days, its subtle and rare. While I don't agree with all their changes (censoring Tharja's ass in the Awakening DLC was going a bit too far IMO), Nintendo at least treats 10-14 year olds with respect, and isn't afraid to expose them to things like death, war, sacrifice, mild fanservice (Great Fairy and Zero Suit Samus are examples), and occasionaly, mild blood. So who do you think is worse?
4kids didn't edit the Fox Kids airing of Escaflowne, Saban did. But specificaly speaking, it was Fox itself who behind most of those changes. Saban was owned by Fox at the time, so Fox pretty much told them what to edit.Broderick said:Aside from One Piece, didn't 4kids also RIP TO SHREDS Escaflowne back when they were the foxbox? Seriously, it was bad, really, really bad. So I will say 4kids. I had thought One Piece was not worth watching until I learned that I watched the heavily censored 4kids version.
Ah yes, I suppose the association between companies confused me. Thanks for clearing that up. I think 4kids is much,much worse than nintendo, even if nintendo did have a bad streak of censorship.TheMisterManGuy said:4kids didn't edit the Fox Kids airing of Escaflowne, Saban did. But specificaly speaking, it was Fox itself who behind most of those changes. Saban was owned by Fox at the time, so Fox pretty much told them what to edit.Broderick said:Aside from One Piece, didn't 4kids also RIP TO SHREDS Escaflowne back when they were the foxbox? Seriously, it was bad, really, really bad. So I will say 4kids. I had thought One Piece was not worth watching until I learned that I watched the heavily censored 4kids version.
Yeah, this pretty much.krebons12 said:Definitely 4kids. At least nintendo had the excuse of "its our stuff we can do what we want with it " 4kids just edited stuff to the point it wouldn't make sense
Not everyone here watches MovieBob, but you're right that Cardcaptor Sakura was butchered. I don't know how much was KidsWB and how much was Nelvana, but it was bad.CaptainMidlands said:Moviebob did an episode about Samurai Pizza Cats for The Escapist covering the story about its releaseShingeki no Gingerbeard said:Samurai Pizza Cats is an interesting tale. It was a Saban dub, not 4Kids, and the original Japanese studio lost most of the original scripts. Saban didn't have anyone in house for translation purposes, so they wrote a brand new script instead to match the visuals. What we got was more-or-less parody, and the Japanese series was played straight. Even the creators admit that SPC was better.
On to the topic I would like to nominate Kids WB, luckily I'm in the UK so we got a relatively good version of Cardcaptor Sakura (It had a lot of the things took out but it wasn't bad) but Kids WB for there US release removed and completely changed episode order to try and paint Li and not Sakura as the lead and turn it in to a more action orientated series
You ever hold a cigarette and a toothpick in your hands at the same time? They're radically different sizes. A lollipop is closer in length and diameter, not to mention the predominantly white color of the stick. Reanimating a toothpick in place of a lollipop would NOT have been less jarring, and badasses can still suck on lollies. Ever hear of Kojack?TheMisterManGuy said:That's the problem! 4kids more often than not, pandered to sterotypes of children. Never really respecting, or caring about their intelligence. As long as they got their parents money that's all that mattered. I understand censoring Sanji's cigarette, that wouldn't fly the Saturday morning censors in America. But of all things, why a lollipop? Why not a toothpick? It would've been an easier edit job, it would've looked less jarring, and it would've made more sense in context of the character. But apparently 4kids wanted to be cheap.Shingeki no Gingerbeard said:Actually I thought Sanji's lollipops were a clever change for younger audiences.
Actually that was Bandai, but Haim Saban was one of the dub producers. Fox also didn't own Saban Entertainment. It was founded in '83 and merged with Fox Children's Productions to create Fox Kids Worldwide in '96; all of which was done to secure for Fox Saban's lucrative contracts with Marvel at a reduced price. By merging into a single company, there were no more licencing fees to air them on Fox's networks.TheMisterManGuy said:4kids didn't edit the Fox Kids airing of Escaflowne, Saban did. But specificaly speaking, it was Fox itself who behind most of those changes. Saban was owned by Fox at the time, so Fox pretty much told them what to edit.Broderick said:Aside from One Piece, didn't 4kids also RIP TO SHREDS Escaflowne back when they were the foxbox? Seriously, it was bad, really, really bad. So I will say 4kids. I had thought One Piece was not worth watching until I learned that I watched the heavily censored 4kids version.