Yes this is the point I made earlier.Both MS and Sony have lost a shit ton of money due to their gaming divisions.The 360 only finally became profitable for MS last year,5 years after launch.Sony's gaming division recorded a loss of $2.8 billion last year(over 5 times Nintendo's losses)which accounted for almost half of Sony's overall losses($5.7 billion in total)forcing Sony to axe 10,000 jobs worldwideLunar Templar said:and make no mistake, both Sony and Microsoft have been losing money on they consoles. a LOT of money.
in short, you should be more worried about your PS3 or 360 not being around much longer, not Nintendo
Yup, tell that to the hundreds of talented people being laid off within the industry because sales didn't meet expectations.Karutomaru said:Yeah, sales mean nothing. Gaming isn't about the money.
Annual loses aren't necessary for a failing company. They've suffered many quarterly losses before, which are enough to kill a company.Zhukov said:Actually, last I checked they're still doing okay.
They recently reported their first annual loss. Ever.
I personally have absolutely zero interest in their products, but calls of their demise are drastically premature.
So you don't care about people losing their jobs and companies going bankrupt just so you can play a game? That's pretty fucking harsh.Karutomaru said:As long as the final product is of high quality, it doesn't matter who gets laid off.
I really can't be bothered explaining to you yet again why this doesn't make any sense.Karutomaru said:A good game company never cares about the money.
It is.Karutomaru said:Yeah, sales mean nothing. Gaming isn't about the money.
I see a lot of people trying to insist this guy was wrong. It seems to me he was being sarcastic, and you all took it literally.verdant monkai said:It is.Karutomaru said:Yeah, sales mean nothing. Gaming isn't about the money.
For the people who make them anyway. It is an industry industries try to make money.
Er, they do, because they need their games to be popular in order to make money.Karutomaru said:Who cares about how popular they are? The point is the quality of their games.
The thing is, it's what he always says.Lugbzurg said:I see a lot of people trying to insist this guy was wrong. It seems to me he was being sarcastic, and you all took it literally.
How exactly can a quarterly loss kill a company if the losses are balanced out by the profits from the rest of the year? Unless you manage to lose all your money in a single quarter, that's not going to happen. And need I remind you of the ENORMOUS pile of money Nintendo is sitting on?Zachary Amaranth said:Annual loses aren't necessary for a failing company. They've suffered many quarterly losses before, which are enough to kill a company.Zhukov said:Actually, last I checked they're still doing okay.
They recently reported their first annual loss. Ever.
I personally have absolutely zero interest in their products, but calls of their demise are drastically premature.
However, Nintendo still seems to be okay.
No that's the thing he is being in no way sarcastic. I remember having almost the exact same conversation, with him a while ago about whether Capcom care about people or not.Lugbzurg said:I see a lot of people trying to insist this guy was wrong. It seems to me he was being sarcastic, and you all took it literally.verdant monkai said:It is.Karutomaru said:Yeah, sales mean nothing. Gaming isn't about the money.
For the people who make them anyway. It is an industry industries try to make money.