They should of had it as the theme, since it was about vikings. Amon Amarth is Viking metal if you didn't know. Who else is disappoint?
What He/She said.RanD00M said:There is no Thor in Thor. The marvel version of Thor completely shits over almost everything related the Thor the god.
punksnotdead said:You really DIDN'T watch the movie at all did you? Amon Amarth may be awesome, and may be about Vikings, but saying that means it belongs in Thor, is like saying Die Fledermaus overture belongs in the Dark Knight, because it means "The Bat."Canid117 said:Did you actually watch Thor? It would have fit about as well as Slipknot would fit as the soundtrack to the Xmen movies.[/quote/]
I never saw any of the X-men movies. Slipknot sucks also. And it would of, 'cuz the movie was about Norse alien gods things or what ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPRt6Tt6RyM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD5tU-5NXd4&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TkGKrwdSso
See? Vikings!
kickyourass said:I thought Cancer bats would of been more suitable for that movie then the classical song thing.punksnotdead said:You really DIDN'T watch the movie at all did you? Amon Amarth may be awesome, and may be about Vikings, but saying that means it belongs in Thor, is like saying Die Fledermaus overture belongs in the Dark Knight, because they it means The Bat.Canid117 said:Did you actually watch Thor? It would have fit about as well as Slipknot would fit as the soundtrack to the Xmen movies.[/quote/]
I never saw any of the X-men movies. Slipknot sucks also. And it would of, 'cuz the movie was about Norse alien gods things or what ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPRt6Tt6RyM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD5tU-5NXd4&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TkGKrwdSso
See? Vikings!
The movie Thor is based on the Marvel comics character who uses characters, settings and themes from Norse mythology and tells stories in a format that blends adventure and super hero comics. The tone, story and visual style would not synch with the songs by Amon Amarth. Just because two properties draw from similar source material does not mean they are compatible. The instrumentals might have worked in a few places but the lyrics and lead singers style would not work at any point in the movie. A similar scenario would occur if FOX had used Slipknots "People Equals Shit" as the main theme for X-Men two. Sure there are a lot of horrible humans in that movie but the tone of the two properties just does not match up. Thor is a high fantasy superhero movie. Neither one of those genres tend to fit well with Metal. There are exceptions to that rule but Thor is not one of them.punksnotdead said:How would it not? "Thor" was supposed to be about vikings.
The movie though, was about magic Vikings from space wasn't it?punksnotdead said:How would it not? "Thor" was supposed to be about vikings.
Yeah, but there's Marvel Thor in Marvel Thor, and it doesn't shit over everything related to Thor the Marvel God.RanD00M said:There is no Thor in Thor. The marvel version of Thor completely shits over almost everything related the Thor the god.
Taking liberties usually means changing a few things just so they can fit said characters story line better. It does not however mean taking a character apart and then throwing in, one thing I think that makes them in any way related.Fraught said:Yeah, but there's Marvel Thor in Marvel Thor, and it doesn't shit over everything related to Thor the Marvel God.RanD00M said:There is no Thor in Thor. The marvel version of Thor completely shits over almost everything related the Thor the god.
What's your point? How's a band's music appearing in a movie about a Norse god who's had some liberties taken with him connected to the liberties taken?
Well, okay, fair point, but why are we even arguing about this? The thread was about Amon Amarth being viking metal, and even if I think a metal band would've been an awful choice for the movie's soundtrack, even the Marvel Norse gods are still connected to vikings, right?RanD00M said:Taking liberties usually means changing a few things just so they can fit said characters story line better. It does not however mean taking a character apart and then throwing in, one thing I think that makes them in any way related.Fraught said:Yeah, but there's Marvel Thor in Marvel Thor, and it doesn't shit over everything related to Thor the Marvel God.RanD00M said:There is no Thor in Thor. The marvel version of Thor completely shits over almost everything related the Thor the god.
What's your point? How's a band's music appearing in a movie about a Norse god who's had some liberties taken with him connected to the liberties taken?
I am not going to rage over this whole thing or anything, I just feel that the Marvel Thor could easily be altered to be more related to the Þór from Ásatrú. I mean there is no reason why this marvel character represents Thor other than being the Norse god of Thunder and being the son of Óðinn. They could just as well rename the main characters and nothing of value would have changed.
Fair enough.Fraught said:I mean, I'm not even an authority to speak on the differences between the "ór from Ásatrú", and "Marvel's Thor", seeing as I haven't acquainted myself with Àsatrú.