So all they did was present a point, then the other guy stated how his game also exhibits the same quality. Then the first guy stated a new point, and the process repeated.
Isn't the idea of a debate that both parties present unique points? Are all their episodes like this?
Honestly, I could think of a dozen different games that use cutscenes excellently. But then I haven't played the two games that were discussed, so I guess they might utilise cutscenes in more appropriate ways. But I have my doubts.
Also, there's a big ongoing debate in the video games industry as to the balance of narratology and ludology; narratology being story, and ludology being gameplay.
Exactly how effective any particular ratio is is entirely subjective, really.
Isn't the idea of a debate that both parties present unique points? Are all their episodes like this?
Honestly, I could think of a dozen different games that use cutscenes excellently. But then I haven't played the two games that were discussed, so I guess they might utilise cutscenes in more appropriate ways. But I have my doubts.
Also, there's a big ongoing debate in the video games industry as to the balance of narratology and ludology; narratology being story, and ludology being gameplay.
Exactly how effective any particular ratio is is entirely subjective, really.
