No Right Answer: Most Addictive Timesink Ever

Recommended Videos

Kenjitsuka

New member
Sep 10, 2009
3,051
0
0
Why is Notch going against his own game?!
Oh wait, you claim Chris is NOT Notch?
Look at the photo's again!!! :O
 

DigitalAtlas

New member
Mar 31, 2011
836
0
0
Terminate421 said:
They are right. Pokemon is like Crack

But its SOOOOO FUCKING GOOD

I always find time to use my team at the battle subway.
I'm surprised they never mentioned getting perfect IVs and training EVs. Dear god. So much time.
 

djAMPnz

New member
Dec 21, 2011
31
0
0
My biggest timesink would have to be Roller Coaster Tycoon 2. My parks were epic, I never wanted to turn that game off. Civilization was pretty addictive too, but not as much as RCT2.
 

Webb Myers

New member
May 17, 2010
76
0
0
Pokemon vs Minecraft is a valid debate...if you're 12 years old.
For the grownups, it's Civ (aka "one more turn") vs WoW (aka "take my money")
 

Darth_Payn

New member
Aug 5, 2009
2,868
0
0
I'm with a few of you guys, how DID MMO's in general, WoW specifically, not get debated about? For that matter, why not TVTropes? I've lost HOURS per night over there taking WikiWalks (hey, that's a trope name!) !
 

Hitchmeister

New member
Nov 24, 2009
453
0
0
Irridium said:
I vote for Civilization. That game makes time its *****.

You start playing, and then fifteen minutes later 12 hours have passed.
"One more turn..."

Captcha: done that (never more appropriate)
 

Hitchmeister

New member
Nov 24, 2009
453
0
0
Darth_Payn said:
I'm with a few of you guys, how DID MMO's in general, WoW specifically, not get debated about? For that matter, why not TVTropes? I've lost HOURS per night over there taking WikiWalks (hey, that's a trope name!) !
Because the person that was going to debate the case of TV Tropes has yet to resurface.
 

jecht35

New member
Jul 2, 2011
92
0
0
HARVEST MOON at least for me, its like I start playing and the whole day goes bye...
 

PoweD

New member
Mar 26, 2009
313
0
0
I vote for Victoria 2, similar situation as Civ only you don't know how fast time is going.One minute you could be building your own small army to deciding what country to conquest next, try it with a friend and you have legal crack cocaine.Has a learning curve of a brick wall so take that as you wish.

TVTropes is a possibility too, its a game about trying to close the web page, next thing you know your browser is filled with TVTropes tabs, endlessly creating even more tabs, until your browser crashes from the tab number.
 

therandombear

Elite Member
Sep 28, 2009
1,649
0
41
Out of those, Pokemon is much more of a timesink then Minecraft, for me that is.

Minecraft alone is terribly boring, Pokemon is not. ;)
 

MightyMole

New member
Mar 5, 2011
140
0
0
I have to go with Pokemon on this one. Minecraft has only really been around for a few years (Really only got really popular a year or 2 ago and only officially released last year) so it's still fresh on everyone's minds. In Minecraft, you have the option to give yourself anything in the game with what you're given. Once you do that, you take away about 2/3 of the game. Making whatever you want is cool, but the novelty of it wears off and it becomes boring and playing survival mode isn't really all that addictive once you've tried creative mode. Multiplayer usually means finding a server which in my experience would have rules which made trying to make things with friends boring as you had to earn money to buy stuff to make things. Then there's the alternative of using Hamachi or another program like that, but that becomes boring as well when you only have 4 or 5 friends trying to make a bunch of big stuff and realize that you guys are most likely going to be the only ones who are going to see all the stuff you worked on. Mods breathe new life into the game for a while, but most aren't anything major. Most of what I've seen is stuff like added climbing controls, slide controls, fixed animations, etc. and the ones that are close *coughcoughPOKEMONMODcoughcough* aren't finished/multiplayer as far as I know.

Pokemon, on the other hand, has been around for almost 15 years now. Sure it's not as big of a deal as it used to be with the theatrical releases, religious protesters, etc. but it's card game and anime are still around so somebody has to be buying/watching it. The games are where it's at though. The games are still the reason a lot of people even buy Nintendo's handhelds. What makes Pokemon so addicting though is it's competitive aspect. The more friends you have that play Pokemon, the more competitive you get, and the more competitive you get the further in the hole you find yourself. It starts out casually enough, playing with the team you've made through the single player game and battling together, then training them to level 100, then making a better team using all the Pokemon at the game's disposal until one day you find yourself riding a bike back and forth in front of the daycare trying to hatch a Pokemon with the right nature and IVs so you can go out and EV train them so that he'll be just that 1 stat better than your buddy's. Even if you go out and buy a cheat device, it doesn't take away the competitive aspect of the games, just makes it easier and cuts down a substantial amount of the work. Even then, you can find yourself addicted to just making different teams to switch out and play with (I got to the point where I made a Sandstorm Team, a Hail Team, a Trick Room Team, and some others back when I was really into it). Minecraft doesn't really have that. Sure you can "compete" to make the coolest building or whatever but that's not really a win/lose scenario as it's more about opinions than anything else.

Of course, both of these aren't nearly as addictive as WoW (As much as I hate it), but this is what the debate was.

Edit: Just to add some information, I spent over 300 hours on Pokemon Diamond alone. I don't even think I spent 30 hours in Minecraft. Having endless possibilities doesn't always make a game more addicting than a game with a somewhat conceivable end point. Throwing someone into a game with no goal really and saying "Have fun" can be fun for a while, but eventually I find myself saying "There's really no point in this, if there's no end that means there's really no true progression so I've seen all there is to see" and put it down. Pokemon has goals that once you've completed you can go to the next one. Beat the elite 4, complete the Pokedex, get master ribbons, beat the battle towers, fight the online battle towers, make the best team you can think of, make the best team you can think of with a theme, and so on. That may not sound like anything on paper, but in practice it can take hundreds of hours. And that's just with one game. The great thing about Pokemon is it has so many games. It's feasible to buy Pokemon Sapphire/Ruby, do all of this in that game, trade them to the next game, repeat the process adding the Pokemon from that game to your party and repeating this until you get to the latest game, Have Pokemon with ribbons from all the games up until that point and perfect stats. Sure this may take you an ungodly amount of time, but I'm sure there's people that have done it over the course of the past 10 years since Ruby/Sapphire came out.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Civilization is the right answer; or maybe Everquest I.

One could also argue Disgaea is far more grind and level intensive than pokemon.
 

RTR

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,351
0
0
I like the zen garden analogy for Minecraft.
I think there should've been something a little more patriotic in honor of the holiday weekend.
 

Urameshi13

New member
Jan 18, 2011
79
0
0
No love for Civ? Much like MineCraft, the possibilities with that game are endless. Which civilization do you choose, which map type, what are your long-term goals? IT NEVER ENDS!

It also makes you actually think and form strategies. I have literally been up all night playing Civ before, and didn't even finish the game I started!
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
I've never played Pokemon. I do love RPGs, but I have never been much for Pokemon. I know, I'm a blasphemer or something. I'm sorry. And honestly, Chris's description makes me happy I never did get into the games.

Probably a bad time to mention that I haven't tried Minecraft, either. I should point out that it interests me, I just haven't gotten around to it.

I think I'll just leave, now...
 

ischmalud

New member
Feb 5, 2011
145
0
0
Sorry chris but kyle won by default - WHY? minecraft....(drumroll) POKEMON MOD!!!!! if ONE timesink ABSORBS the other one it has to be superior! (I made that argument for big ladies once and get into trouble so its not always true but in this case it is)
But i have to give chris pts for the *shakepeerian rpg* (pretty sure thats not how u spell it but i just woke up and i feel like i should be back in bed.

P.S. u sure u dont drink chris?! i mean....REALLY?