No you stupid Hollywood person, its wrong.

Recommended Videos

Realitycrash

New member
Dec 12, 2010
2,779
0
0
brandon237 said:
Blatant disregard for the laws of physics.

In Spider-Man 2, There is a sun. In an room. With people in it. There is an object with sustained nuclear fusion in the centre of a not too massive room, and there are living people occupying that same room for more than thousandth of a second. Nevermind the fact that something that hot just left out in the open would melt a city block with not all that great difficulty, but you actually have people watching this in the SAME ROOM.

.
Eh, the surface of the sun is something like 6.000C hot, meaning that we create hotter fires every day, without melting an entire block. The reason the sun puts out that much energy is because it is fucking MASSIVE. So no, it wouldn't melt the entire block.
Still, it would put out some rather interesting ammounts of radiation, but maybe the room was "shielded" or something..

And OT: Plot-driven stupidity gets me every time. Especially in horror-films, ESPECIALLY in the new The Walking Dead. I know we are supposed to feel attached and sympathetic with the moms in the show and how their children get killed off or endangered by equally stupid actions as the plot demands, but I just scream in fury at the TV. "Please, please, PLEASE die. Twenty minutes of a fourty-minute show spent watching someone cry and moan about their kids DO NOT MAKE A GOOD DRAMA".
Heh, Penny Arcade already made a spoof of it.
 

-Adracko-

New member
Oct 18, 2010
56
0
0
The movie '9' bugs the shit outta me during one specific scene
Early on when the go to rescue the creativeish from the cat. The cat is trying to revive the AI by placing the button thing in the slot. They defeat the cat and 9 out of retarded curiosity completes exactly what they were trying to stop the cat from doing. What the fu.... Completely ruined the movie for me...
Sorry memory is kinda shakey, but that damn scene....rage
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,681
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
OneCatch said:
Das Boot anyone?
'That guy's so uptight, he could crack nuts between his but cheeks!'

I was also going to add: 'I Captured a U-Boat', anyone?
One thing you missed about U-571 (actually a couple things), the clothing while on operation tended to be very informal and virtually no-one wore uniform except perhaps their cap, and the size... that command centre was fucking massive compared to a real U-boat's...

Anyway, most of the crap that I wanted to say has been mentioned, so:

Gladiator - I'd reel off all the pet-peeves I have with this film, but it'd take all day, soooo

1. his name, it's said in the wrong order or whoever came up with it didn't do any research on Latin naming conventions
2. opening battle scene soundtrack... listen carefully, hear the Zulus!
3. allusions to a return of the Republic
4. Lucius died in infancy, IIRC, and Commodus may have been capricious, but he wasn't a deviant
5. Colosseum (reference & size)
6. Stirrups...?!?! (actually, the lack of stirrups in Alexander is one of the few good things about it...)
7. Use of artillery on the battlefield... and in a forest...

That'll do for now, I think...

But one of the biggest annoyances I have with films about WWII is the number of times tanks are subbed out for fucking M60s...
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
Any WW2 movie where the Americans won it all by themselves, the British, French and Russians were just there to provide funny accents, if they were even there at all, and every single German recruit was a cross between Hannibal Lecter and Darth Vader.

The one that particularly pissed me off was the one that depicted the American's as having found and decoded the Enigma all by themselves (I can't remember its name). No America, no you did not.

Yes, I know, dramatic license and all that, but considering how ignorant so many people are to current events and history, it really does concern me the amount of people who get there information as to what happened in times like these from entertainment. So out there there must be many, many people who genuinely believe that that was how things really went down, which I consider to be rather disrespectful. While I wouldn't want to be too dictatorial about it, I really think Hollywood should have a responsibility to pay at least some attention to historical accuracy.
 

Lieju

New member
Jan 4, 2009
3,044
0
0
Vrex360 said:
I will tell you what consistently annoys me is when people making killer shark or killer prehistoric monster or killer whatever else do absolutely NO research on them at all. Like none.
For instance in Deep Blue Sea, there is a scene where someone lowers what the characters claim to be a tiger shark except that it looks nothing like a bloody tiger shark.
Tiger sharks have square heads and they are grey, that thing was a pointy headed great white that had been painted yellow and given stripes. You seriously couldn't even google image search the bloody things?
Plus then there are the false information given in movies like this. For instance as much as I loved The Grey, it's very problematic that the behavior of the grey wolves depicted in this movie is so innaccurate to their actual behavior in the real world. When they had only just escaped extinction because of people killing them for their undeserved fierce reptutation it's not great that a movie then brings it right back again.
To be fair the filmmakers did put proper information about the grey wolf on the official website so that's a point to them.
But still I see this happen so much its insulting, movie makers make up facts about animals. Like in that crappy movie Primeval (about Gustave the killer crocodile), ignoring the fact that they were taking a real life horror and making it into cheap popcorn entertainment for Western Audiences, they again, have no idea how crocodiles actually are. They aren't that fast moving and they don't need to eat very much.

It annoys me because a lot of animals have a bad enough reputation as it is, without movies getting facts wrong and making it worse. The movie Jaws almost caused the extinction of the Great White Shark and it worries me what other movies might do the same later on.
This kind of a thing, so much. Although, in general, the more 'realistic' it tries to be, and fails, the worse it is. I actually enjoy stupid horror movies where the animal behaviour is so ridiculous, it's just silly.

Same goes for historical accuracy.

One of my pet peeves is how Hollywood apparently doesn't understand what 'evolution' means. Although, there are a lot of things fiction gets wrong to make the plot more interesting, and I might just mainly pick up on stuff I personally know about.

But it's no wonder we get these evolution/creationism 'debates', when it seems most people get their idea of what biologists mean with 'evolutionary theory' from movies/tv series where it's basically magic.
 

Alcamonic

New member
Jan 6, 2010
747
0
0
Protagonist getting a massive second wind, even though he/she is more or less bleeding his/her guts out. Then proceed to fight just fine, for several minutes.
Sure, adrenalin can numb the pain temporarily but that does not justify the body functioning 100%.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
Hollywood does not know how computers, or computer games, work.

This does not stop them from creating their own games, hackers, computer experts, hardware, etc.

Particularly with games, I understand, licensing costs money. But seriously, you could put a little more effort into it...

This, and scenes like it, are what really grind my gears.

I do believe this makes anyone rage.

EDIT: and when they treat 1337-speek like some kind of legit encoding? Just no.
 

Xangba

New member
Apr 6, 2005
250
0
0
Ehh it usually doesn't bother, because I view it as purely a form of entertainment therefore allowed to pull B.S. Most of the time. I guess a common thing that kind of gets me is how every explosion involves fire. You'd think at least one person working on a movie has some kind of experience with explosives, and if not has at least seen Mythbusters.

Wait no, I do have something where I *****. When a movie adaptation of a book absolutely BUTCHERS the source material. I could list a bunch, but I don't want to waken suppressed memories in anyone.
OneCatch said:
Noise in space
Not so much that it bothers me, but you have to love Firefly for this. Why oh why did it only get one season? I miss Jayne...
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
Realitycrash said:
brandon237 said:
Blatant disregard for the laws of physics.

In Spider-Man 2, There is a sun. In an room. With people in it. There is an object with sustained nuclear fusion in the centre of a not too massive room, and there are living people occupying that same room for more than thousandth of a second. Nevermind the fact that something that hot just left out in the open would melt a city block with not all that great difficulty, but you actually have people watching this in the SAME ROOM.

.
Eh, the surface of the sun is something like 6.000C hot, meaning that we create hotter fires every day, without melting an entire block. The reason the sun puts out that much energy is because it is fucking MASSIVE. So no, it wouldn't melt the entire block.
Still, it would put out some rather interesting ammounts of radiation, but maybe the room was "shielded" or something..
That is the surface. Which is very very very very very far (read: quite a few earth diameters) from where the actual fusion occurs. Not to mention the corona is over a million degrees in some areas. Now if you placed a million degree pin-head anywhere in a city block for a few minutes, you would have "technical problems", if you consider the fact that there is no longer a city block to be a... "technical problem". Also, a region that is sustaining fusion for more than a minute with enough Hydrogen to create a nice big flaming ball, fitted with city-bending magnetic field and all, is going to be a LOT hotter than 6000 degrees Kelvin.

In the last fight scene, the mini-sun is actively fusing material for over 6 minutes flat, within that time it would have released enough heat to fry Manhattan. More than once. And characters are frequently getting within a few meters of it.
 

Sexy Devil

New member
Jul 12, 2010
701
0
0
brandon237 said:
Blatant disregard for the laws of physics.

In Spider-Man 2, There is a sun. In an room. With people in it. There is an object with sustained nuclear fusion in the centre of a not too massive room, and there are living people occupying that same room for more than thousandth of a second. Nevermind the fact that something that hot just left out in the open would melt a city block with not all that great difficulty, but you actually have people watching this in the SAME ROOM.

And the start of 2012, Neutrinos? Causing the whole Earth to bonkers? Dafuq? That is like me saying that the sun (a pretty average, stable star) has just decided to scrap that whole "weak nuclear force" thing and do whatever the F*** it likes. NO 2012 directors, just NO.

And there was some stupid movie with Owls, "legend of the Guardians" or something like that, in which these little owls wore HUGE METAL MASKS. And not thin ones either. Yet they had agile dogfights all over the show.

So annoying...
I've got another one from Spider-man 2. You know at the end how Peter rescues Mary Jane from the crumbling building and they swing to safety? There is absolutely nothing for the web to latch onto in that area, the building was completely surrounded by the river; he was swinging on air.
 

Who Dares Wins

New member
Dec 26, 2009
750
0
0
I watched Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen last night and I was in pain from all the inaccuracies.

GIANT TALKING, TRANSFORMING ALIEN ROBOTS COMING DOWN TO EARTH IS A MORE REALISTIC SCENARIO THAN SOME OF THE HUMAN INTERACTIONS THAT HAPPEN IN THE MOVIE. I know that an usual "general consensus" is that the majority of humans are "dumb", but goddamn, the stuff in the movie was just asinine.
 

OneCatch

New member
Jun 19, 2010
1,111
0
0
Vegan_Doodler said:
OneCatch said:
How about idiocy driven horror films? No one?
Me to, YEY, I'm not original
I watched three of the Halloween movies least ummm Halloween (I think it was those movies, Michel mires was the bad guy), it was the first, fifth and sixth I think, by the time the time he's pulled the same shit six times shouldn't someone realise that he's probably not dead. one of them ended with him being electrocuted and burnt (after being kicked out of a first floor window) and they thought he was dead, fair enough assumption, but this was Michel Miers, why didn't the protagonists just smash his head in with a fucking sledgehammer, until its been ground into a fine past and then just burn whatever left. Problem solved.

Seeing as I'm not an expert in history, science or IT, I don't really notice when they mess up in that regard, But I do really hate it when things don't adhere to their own logic or any kind of realism, The show Bones for example, I like the show but seriously, how the hell can Angela do all that stuff with that computer, instant 3D models from photographs is as far as I know impossible, and why is she their in the first place, she isn't even a scientist she just acts really condescending towards people who are vastly more intelligent then her.
Ach, I was kidding about being unoriginal!

And yeah, that's exactly the kind of thing I was talking about. And from the sound of Bones, it does the same things as CSI. Do they have massive pointless multi-touch interfaces in Bones as well? :p

Realitycrash said:
brandon237 said:
Blatant disregard for the laws of physics.

In Spider-Man 2, There is a sun. In an room. With people in it. There is an object with sustained nuclear fusion in the centre of a not too massive room, and there are living people occupying that same room for more than thousandth of a second. Nevermind the fact that something that hot just left out in the open would melt a city block with not all that great difficulty, but you actually have people watching this in the SAME ROOM.

.
Eh, the surface of the sun is something like 6.000C hot, meaning that we create hotter fires every day, without melting an entire block. The reason the sun puts out that much energy is because it is fucking MASSIVE. So no, it wouldn't melt the entire block.
Still, it would put out some rather interesting ammounts of radiation, but maybe the room was "shielded" or something..
I thought I'd do some very rough maths for fun

Solar output [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun] is 6.3x10^8 Watts/meter of surface area

Lets say Doc Ocs mini-sun has 5 meter radius.
It's total surface area [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere#Surface_area_of_a_sphere] is therefore 314m^2
That suggests an output of (6.3x10^8) x 314 = 1.9x10^11 Watts.

That's about the raw output [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_%28power%29#gigawatt_.28109_watts.29] of a Saturn V rocket [http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_P7TviySkUwc/TULC-8-U1HI/AAAAAAAAABg/uO5OjOJwc_o/s1600/Saturn+V+Launch.jpg], so I think it would be getting a mite toasty in that building...

As an aside, how on earth does Doc get the densities [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_core] required for solar fusion? If he had some kind of workaround, fine, but it's specifically claimed to be solar style fusion
 

OneCatch

New member
Jun 19, 2010
1,111
0
0
Xangba said:
Snip
OneCatch said:
Noise in space
Not so much that it bothers me, but you have to love Firefly for this. Why oh why did it only get one season? I miss Jayne...
I miss Firefly too :(
The bit with Simon in a spacesuit because Jayne told him he had to wear one still makes me chuckle thinking about it!
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
GrimTuesday said:
For me, its historical inaccuracies.
For me, it depends on the movie. Remember that King Arthur movie that was advertising historical accuracy? That pissed me off hugely, because it was both bad and inaccurate. Braveheart, your example, bugged me somewhat less, but the whole "it's history!" angle pisses me off a tad.

On a similar note, I can suspend disbelief with the best of them, but when someone starts talking about realism in CSI, I want to explode. I am not a comprehensive database of technology, but when I saw interviews with technical advisors for the show who talked about realism....

Really, all they should have said was "I'm sorry, I'm so sorry."
 

Airsoftslayer93

Minecraft King
Mar 17, 2010
680
0
0
Shanicus said:
Explosions. There hasn't been a single hollywood movie that has gotten explosions right. People are standing right next to big (and little) blasts and getting knocked back a little - when in reality, they would die from all their organs liquifying.
The other guys makes a great joke about this.

Apart from the 'never reload' thing, and the general tropes that should always get dragged up.
Films also tend to portray drugs completely incorrectly. They tend to be 'you tyr any drug once and your life is ruined' when in fact drugs like marujuana and even LSD have never had any deaths attached to them. But I suppose the war against drugs can't be counteracted.
 

Robert632

New member
May 11, 2009
3,870
0
0
brandon237 said:
snip
And there was some stupid movie with Owls, "legend of the Guardians" or something like that, in which these little owls wore HUGE METAL MASKS. And not thin ones either. Yet they had agile dogfights all over the show.

So annoying...
It gets better in the books, where they not only wear the metal masks, not only wear metal talons over top of their original talons, but also fly around, having dogfights, with sticks with fire at the end. Never do these sticks go out, never do they burn low enough to be useless/burn them.

Then after that, they start wielding ice weapons. In a fucking desert.
 

RubyT

New member
Sep 3, 2009
372
0
0
Historical inaccuracy is bad.
You can't go around and rewrite history (without proclaiming so) because people will take offense in that.

Also, movies based on living or just recently deceased people. You don't just make up things they did or lines they said. It's not creative license, it usually is slander!

Computer stuff is usually cringe-worthy, examples have been named. Science as well.

One of my least favourite example is a Voyager-episode:

- First, a time-ship from the 29th century comes back to the 24th century. The voyager defeats it. I think if a single modern destroyer were to travel back 500 years in time, it would take out the whole Spanish Armada and English navy together.

- Then, the time ship crashes in 1977 and some guy salvages its parts and starts off a tech-company based on that. That's crap. If I travel back to 1426 and give some dude an iPhone, it's not gonna do sh*t to the timeline. What's he supposed to do with it? Everything in it is way beyond his comprehension. Even if he would somehow understand how it works, he couldn't replicate it, because the infrastructur is lacking. He would have to single-handedly reverse-engineer 800 years worth of manufacturing progress in his lifetime.
If you'd send a modern Core i-something CPU to an Intel engineer in 1977 - even that isn't gonna do much. If Intel were to build this CPU on their 1977 manufacturing processes, it would be as big as a flatscreen tv and cost a couple of million bucks. They knew back then that getting more transistors on the die will make it compute faster. But unless you're sending the fab too, it doesn't help them much.

- Finally, the Voyager tries to beam up that time ship from his lab and he uses the transporter beam to download stuff from their database!!! At that point I was really furious, because so much bullsh*t annoys me.
 

Quaxar

New member
Sep 21, 2009
3,949
0
0
I have never seen a film that portrayed anything related to medicine right apart maybe from "people tend to use handkerchiefs if they've got the flu".
Get any scene where anyone flatlines and I can guarantee you they shocked him a maximum of two times (on Baywatch for more drama) and he was fine. Also, watch out how in hospitals no doctor ever reaches for adrenalin, atropin or in fact any medication. Paddles are so great, I don't understand how they don't treat fractures with them.

It's not so hard to get proper basic medicine facts...
I'm looking at you, Pulp Fiction.

<youtube=vfeIuFgZyD0>

You probably remember that the human body does not posses a "breast plate" you have to forcefully stab through, it's 12 pairs of ribs so if you want to get into the heart that way (for whatever sick reasons you'd like to attempt that) all you have to do is go between two ribs, probably best between 4 and 5.

Also notice that a simple Google search would have told you that heroin does not act the way you portray nor do you treat it like that.
Heroin as an opiate won't do anything to your heart, instead ODing will suppress your breathing so less oxygen means at best you get more adrenalin in your system and a quicker heartbeat. Giving your heart even more stress will really not help.
Wikipedia and probably every half-smart junkie could have told you that there's something called naloxone which is a competitive antagonist, meaning it will bind to the same receptors in your body as heroin without activating them and actually will even displace the heroin already on there. Really, it wouldn't have made much difference without looking like an idiot to everyone with a bit of medical knowledge.


brandon237 said:
Realitycrash said:
brandon237 said:
Blatant disregard for the laws of physics.

In Spider-Man 2, There is a sun. In an room. With people in it. There is an object with sustained nuclear fusion in the centre of a not too massive room, and there are living people occupying that same room for more than thousandth of a second. Nevermind the fact that something that hot just left out in the open would melt a city block with not all that great difficulty, but you actually have people watching this in the SAME ROOM.

.
Eh, the surface of the sun is something like 6.000C hot, meaning that we create hotter fires every day, without melting an entire block. The reason the sun puts out that much energy is because it is fucking MASSIVE. So no, it wouldn't melt the entire block.
Still, it would put out some rather interesting ammounts of radiation, but maybe the room was "shielded" or something..
That is the surface. Which is very very very very very far (read: quite a few earth diameters) from where the actual fusion occurs. Not to mention the corona is over a million degrees in some areas. Now if you placed a million degree pin-head anywhere in a city block for a few minutes, you would have "technical problems", if you consider the fact that there is no longer a city block to be a... "technical problem". Also, a region that is sustaining fusion for more than a minute with enough Hydrogen to create a nice big flaming ball, fitted with city-bending magnetic field and all, is going to be a LOT hotter than 6000 degrees Kelvin.

In the last fight scene, the mini-sun is actively fusing material for over 6 minutes flat, within that time it would have released enough heat to fry Manhattan. More than once. And characters are frequently getting within a few meters of it.
Obviously the whole thing is stuck inside a magnetic field and as everyone knows magnetic fields stop everything. Sheeh, he's a doctor after all, do you really think Octavius wouldn't have thought of that?