Hey there, everyone. I'm new. I came for Yahtzee, met the LRR folks, and am now going to tentatively stick my toe into the forums an express an opinion. Yay me! Flame on.
Ever since I started paying attention to what the Internet thought about video games I could afford to purchase, I have been more than a little confused at the reactions I have seen concerning the Nintendo brand.
Now in a moment of transparency, I am fully willing to admit that so long as Zelda and Metroid are on the table, I will always be paying at least some attention to Nintendo hardware. Dunno if that makes me a fanboy or not, I leave it to you.
Anyway, the vitriol towards Nintendo takes me by surprise primarily because from any objective point of view, Nintendo has been running laps around its competition this generation. No! Stop! Spare me the Casual/Hardcore gamer argument a moment and give me a sec! Look at it from a business angle and you'll see my point.
Had Nintendo attempted to release an equivalent system to the 360 or the PS3 they likely would be exclusively software producers by now. For years, the PS3 and the 360 lost money on every system sold. Now, backed my Microsoft and Sony, this was a (somewhat) viable option... they could afford to throw away money on consoles because their real business was Windows and DVD players respectively. Had the 360 and PS3 been products of companies that were restricted to their Video Game products, (and if Nintendo had attempted to follow suit) we likely would have ended up with another Video Game crash like the one that ended the age of Atari.
Instead, Nintendo produced the Wii primarily through the use of Gamecube technology. The very first Wii that sold produced a profit and the system sold like hotcakes. Yeah, the graphics did not match what was being produced on the PS3 and 360, but seriously, graphifile. How many of you who didn't enjoy motion control games would have liked them if the graphics had been better? The games either worked or they didn't, and I'll be the first to say that 3rd party games for the Wii have been a disappointment. Of course Nintendo has done them well (what else would you expect from Nintendo?) and so it makes you wonder what kind of future of the Kinect and the Move will be, given that the most accomplished publisher of Motion Control games won't be making games for them.
I think the reason I keep being intrigued by Nintendo is that they have consistently taken risks with their technology. They are console innovators, experimenting with the way we play games, beyond endless one-upmanship with CPU's and graphics chips. Occasionally that has bitten them (Virtual Boy, anyone?) but mostly they have made very good on their innovations.
Now I agree that motion-control has about petered out for precision gaming. We want more precise controls for most of our games. That said, I think the Wii or an equivalent will be in production for basically forever, because as a "pick-up and play" style of toy, it has been an overwhelming success.
What's next? Dunno. Maybe the combined success of the Wii and various incarnations of the DS will give Nintendo the base it needs to push the technology envelope again, and a new super-console is on the horizon. Whatever happens they're sure to do it with the professionalism and acumen that has defined the company since their early days. They are very, very good at what they do.
Which, all in all, makes it very hard to say that they suck with any kind of integrity.
Ever since I started paying attention to what the Internet thought about video games I could afford to purchase, I have been more than a little confused at the reactions I have seen concerning the Nintendo brand.
Now in a moment of transparency, I am fully willing to admit that so long as Zelda and Metroid are on the table, I will always be paying at least some attention to Nintendo hardware. Dunno if that makes me a fanboy or not, I leave it to you.
Anyway, the vitriol towards Nintendo takes me by surprise primarily because from any objective point of view, Nintendo has been running laps around its competition this generation. No! Stop! Spare me the Casual/Hardcore gamer argument a moment and give me a sec! Look at it from a business angle and you'll see my point.
Had Nintendo attempted to release an equivalent system to the 360 or the PS3 they likely would be exclusively software producers by now. For years, the PS3 and the 360 lost money on every system sold. Now, backed my Microsoft and Sony, this was a (somewhat) viable option... they could afford to throw away money on consoles because their real business was Windows and DVD players respectively. Had the 360 and PS3 been products of companies that were restricted to their Video Game products, (and if Nintendo had attempted to follow suit) we likely would have ended up with another Video Game crash like the one that ended the age of Atari.
Instead, Nintendo produced the Wii primarily through the use of Gamecube technology. The very first Wii that sold produced a profit and the system sold like hotcakes. Yeah, the graphics did not match what was being produced on the PS3 and 360, but seriously, graphifile. How many of you who didn't enjoy motion control games would have liked them if the graphics had been better? The games either worked or they didn't, and I'll be the first to say that 3rd party games for the Wii have been a disappointment. Of course Nintendo has done them well (what else would you expect from Nintendo?) and so it makes you wonder what kind of future of the Kinect and the Move will be, given that the most accomplished publisher of Motion Control games won't be making games for them.
I think the reason I keep being intrigued by Nintendo is that they have consistently taken risks with their technology. They are console innovators, experimenting with the way we play games, beyond endless one-upmanship with CPU's and graphics chips. Occasionally that has bitten them (Virtual Boy, anyone?) but mostly they have made very good on their innovations.
Now I agree that motion-control has about petered out for precision gaming. We want more precise controls for most of our games. That said, I think the Wii or an equivalent will be in production for basically forever, because as a "pick-up and play" style of toy, it has been an overwhelming success.
What's next? Dunno. Maybe the combined success of the Wii and various incarnations of the DS will give Nintendo the base it needs to push the technology envelope again, and a new super-console is on the horizon. Whatever happens they're sure to do it with the professionalism and acumen that has defined the company since their early days. They are very, very good at what they do.
Which, all in all, makes it very hard to say that they suck with any kind of integrity.