Mr. In-between said:
In another fifty years, they'll all be singing a different song when titles like Super Mario Bros. 3 and Super Metroid are looked upon the way that Moby Dick and Tom Sawyer currently are in the literary sphere.
Not by Roger Ebert
Anyway, the reason people dislike, not hate, Nintendo is their shameless milking of franchises (See George Lucas). It's not that we don't actually like Metroid, Mario, Goldeneye et al. it's just that Nintendo see it as a way of printing money and don't do anything really NEW with the licenses.
It's just "Here's a new Mario game. You WILL like it."
How about something a little different? That isn't just respawning the same character in a different ground; and not respawning in the sort of titles gamers want to see. (Also see Sonic)
It's like Disney, some of their earlier stuff was astounding and they KNOW how to make people feel kinship with their properties, but then it's milk-milk-milk and it produces vehement fans that scream for more...and always feel slightly dissapointed when it's the same thing.
Pixar understands. Valve understands. Even Blizzard understands that more of the same isn't necessarily a good thing. Activision/Electronic Arts does the same thing as Nintendo, rather than try something new, they just re-re-re-re-re-re-release the same stuff to the ravening fans.
And it's those fans, and Nintendo's squeezing of them, that creates the hate. Terry Pratchett has created 38 re-makes of the Discworld, and a few are duds, but on the whole he innovates.
Nintendo just unnovates. (That's a word now

)
Edit: Oh, and welcome, we try not to flame here. Unless it's Kotick, Langdell, Thompson or the like
