NSA + FBI Files Leaked, Massive Snooping on Millions of Americans

Recommended Videos

TrulyBritish

New member
Jan 23, 2013
473
0
0
I kinda feel sorry for the guys who actually have to sort through and listen to some of that stuff... can you imagine how boring it must be to listen to some people's lives. I don't know about you lot but a lot of the time on the phone is just me saying "Yup... ahuh.... that's good.....Yeah, yeah, if you want" and so on and so forth.
 

Hero of Lime

Staaay Fresh!
Jun 3, 2013
3,114
0
41
There are worse things the government could do, but seeing all these recent examples (like the IRS scandal) of government agencies using their influence to go after people they don't like is a legitimate fear. I'm just glad I don't use my phone much since I am with Verizon.
 

Johanthemonster666

New member
May 25, 2010
688
0
0
Devil said:
Well, we all knew the NSA was a bit of a wonky organization, but who knew they'd go this far?

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/nsa-verizon-records/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
And
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/06/06/189132530/spy-agencys-collection-of-phone-records-reopens-controversy
And
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/06/18806685-data-collection-divide-muddles-party-labels-makes-strange-bedfellows?lite


Apparnetly, a whistle blower announced that the NSA and FBI were allowed to collect "Meta Data" on every American phone call made in the past 3 months and check for multiple areas within with no need for a warrant or probable cause.

And not a day later, another leak was announced that the NSA has been "mining" online files of every American at the same time with massive chunks of all their online, email and personal photos and data.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/06/politics/nsa-internet-mining/index.html

The best part? The White House is defending it, Congress is mostly defending it. The NSA director later went on air saying he refuses to step down still and continues on with his mission (MSNBC interview).

I'm just spreading the word so this isn't thrown under the rug and forgotten. I have no idea what to do or suggest, but word needs to spread and a magnifying glass needs to be used on the NSA and FBI now more than ever.

I will update it when I get more info / figure things out.

So what are your feelings on the matter? Is this good for civil defense? Bad for civil liberties? A mix? Please share your feelings.

EDIT: Why is this thread being ignored but the threads involving a few guys making sexist remarks suddenly wildfire that has hundreds of replies? Is what random people say more important than an entire governmental conspiracy and invasion? There is a reason this crap is being allowed because it's ignored. Most news websites aren't even talking about it anymore and it's only been 24 hours.
Why is everyone shocked by this? Several leftwing groups in the US, as well as civil libertarians across the spectrum were up in arms about this since Bush passed the Patriot Act, and later when Obama expanded those executive orders with his own, expand government powers on detainment/information gathering, and put them on steroids just to cement (shield) them beyond judicial/public oversight (what existed of it anyway). Threads like this get ignored because US 'liberals' and 'conservatives' pretend like it's a non-issue unless they (personally) find themselves on the other end of the stick.

Enriching the '1%' with taxpayer money,increasing the military-security complex (at home and abroad) are something all presidents in the past 50 years have followed...but the extent of it in the past 12 years is truly disturbing beyond belief.

Liberals would have had Romney impeached by now, but under Obama their supposed anti-war/anti-surveillance protests magically melted away. They apologize and rationalize away "Bush's 3rd-4th term" under Obama with shameless excuses, lies, ignorance and outright omission of public information that would make Cheney well-up with pride.

We're off the global spectrum for even centrist/moderate politics- our liberals are republicans that believe in minor reforms whilst bombing/controlling the globe to spread 'human rights' and 'democracy', our conservatives are borderline fascists with a fetishism for nationalism, conquest,and cronyism (much like their counterparts) but are more unapologetic in their hatred for workers and minorities. Our 'libertarians' have taken over a word that means the opposite historically, and are just glorified college intellectuals who worship Milton Friedman, Ayn Rand, Ron Paul and the Von Mises institute.

So yea, to the rest of the world we must look and sound pretty insane. But I assure you, most of the American populace knows this and have simply resigned themselves out of a sense of helplessness and lack of organization. But this won't always be the case. I think popular anger and outrage are bubbling up in waves...it's only a matter of time before the whole thing explodes into all out resistance to these injustices.
 

Wraith

New member
Oct 11, 2011
356
0
0
So you're telling me those Illuminati nutters all over my Facebook may have a legitimate argument now? Fuck.
 

Rainforce

New member
Apr 20, 2009
693
0
0
I like how this is all only a problem because US citizens are suddenly affected...
I mean, it's no problem when it comes to all the dirty foreigners, right?

/sarcasm

seriously, politics are fucked up, and in EVERY SINGLE country at that. Why are we doing this again?
Freedom? Equality? Something that isn't plain greed and hunger for power?
EDIT: As someone who doesn't live in the US I have the feeling that a certain foreign power is excessively spying on us without having any kind of good intentions. Hell, even CHINA terrorizes the world less.
 

idarkphoenixi

New member
May 2, 2011
1,492
0
0
I'm thinking there's a good chance we might see impeachment as a result of this. Unless Obama pulls some serious back-pedalling and P.R work out of his pocket.

Taking all bets!
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
idarkphoenixi said:
I'm thinking there's a good chance we might see impeachment as a result of this. Unless Obama pulls some serious back-pedalling and P.R work out of his pocket.
What would such impeachment accomplish, even if it succeeds? Nothing, pretty much, since the next prez would simply be back to having plausible deniability, whoever it was going to be.
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
Johanthemonster666 said:
Why is everyone shocked by this?
My guess is that they are either very young or very uninformed. Warrantless spying on citizens has been legal on the US for more than a decade and the government has been caught using trojans and virus more than once.

idarkphoenixi said:
I'm thinking there's a good chance we might see impeachment as a result of this.
Find it weird too that people are talking about impeachment, as it shows they have no freaking clue about the laws in US. Let me clarify it, under the current law the government of the US is allowed to kill or spy any US or non US citizen as long as they feel it's necessary, read the patriot act, this is totally lawful, the only thing the government has to do is to draw (not prove) some kind of plausible connection between the target and terrorism.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Tanakh said:
Johanthemonster666 said:
Why is everyone shocked by this?
My guess is that they are either very young or very uninformed. Warrantless spying on citizens has been legal on the US for more than a decade and the government has been caught using trojans and virus more than once.
Actually, as long as plausible deniability exists, you can only kind of sort of suspect such stuff is happening, even if you know it is. That's the reason such operations are covert, so that even when everyone knows they exist, you have plausible deniability.

The moment that goes out the window, the moment people know what exactly is going on, well, they can speak out against it much better than speaking about some vague thing we all know is kind of sort of going on but can't do much about it because of plausible deniability.

So I don't think it's a case of "young uninformed people being suddenly shocked"; but more a case of "people suddenly being given some actual ammo to attack a previously vague, amorphous concept that can't even be pinned down."
 

Tanakh

New member
Jul 8, 2011
1,512
0
0
Vegosiux said:
Actually, as long as plausible deniability exists, you can only kind of sort of suspect such stuff is happening, even if you know it is. That's the reason such operations are covert, so that even when everyone knows they exist, you have plausible deniability.

The moment that goes out the window, the moment people know what exactly is going on, well, they can speak out against it much better than speaking about some vague thing we all know is kind of sort of going on but can't do much about it because of plausible deniability.

So I don't think it's a case of "young uninformed people being suddenly shocked"; but more a case of "people suddenly being given some actual ammo to attack a previously vague, amorphous concept that can't even be pinned down."
Ahhh... wait, what? You must have missed stuff like Magic Lantern ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Lantern_(software) ). There is no plausible deniability, hasn't been there for decades, we know for a fact they use trojans, keyloggers and viruses; the deniability went "out of the window" almost a decade ago, and there has been several more cases after the magic lantern one. Guess what, it also doesn't matter because it's legal under US laws, it even has a term for it "Policeware".

Guess you weren't following this kind of news back then...
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Tanakh said:
Guess you weren't following this kind of news back then...
Being half the world away, I only really hear about it once it goes international. And we both know what the "international" news were stuffed with 12 years ago, so I'd not be surprised if that one slipped under the radar.
 

michael87cn

New member
Jan 12, 2011
922
0
0
I always thought it was a governments job to serve us, but more and more it seems we just exist to serve a government. We're spied upon and distrusted. When they up the ante to cameras in your home, will it still be okay? What about if its just on the neighborhood block? That's fine, you can still hide inside! I mean, what if a terrorist *gasp* lives nearby! They could kill dozens of people! We better spy on the entire country to prevent such a tradgedy. Nothing bad could ever come of this power...... rightttt? Because leaders are always good guys in america! They're born that way! Not possible for a tyrant to rise in this country.

Nope.

That is why this is a problem, slowly getting worse.

And you know what? There can be no standing up to a modern day government nowadays. The technology is too powerful. They can microwave you inside your own home. Don't even have to chase you down with guns or blow you up with missles. They can roll through your neighborhood and microwave everyone into puddles of goop.
 

Jopoho

New member
Nov 17, 2009
125
0
0
On the bright side, they must surely know what I want for my birthday and know exactly where to ship it. Also, in regards to the thread not having attention, I think people are starting to assume every facet of their lives are public knowledge, and between stuff like this and facebook, they're not completely off base.
 

Hellz_Barz

New member
May 16, 2009
476
0
0
I'm not American but I already knew the NSA was monitoring just about everything imaginable.
I don't see how anyone can be surprised.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
Well how else will they keep us safe from the terrorists? If you have nothing to hide then you should be happy to share your personal information. I think the police should be allowed entry to any home at any time if it will help keep us safe from terrorists and criminals.
 

Trueflame

New member
Apr 16, 2013
111
0
0
I think this is terrible. Maybe it helps capture or foil terrorists, maybe it doesn't, I don't know, and frankly I don't even care. I think the price is simply too high for a little added security. I think these actions violate the spirit of the Constitution, and if this isn't snipped in the bud now, it can only get worse and spiral further out of control.

It's ridiculous that various intelligence organizations, and the government, can simply demand files or data from other organizations without any of it ever being made public, and where even bringing up the fact that this is happening constitutes a crime. I don't even have any words for anyone who isn't at least a little appalled by this.

At the very least, you'd think more people would be talking about this subject here, since it connects so nicely with all the Xbox One and Kinect bashing that has been going on. After all, if data can be demanded from Verizon and Google and others, do people really think the treasure trove that is the Kinect will be exempt?
 

ThreeName

New member
May 8, 2013
459
0
0
Rocket Taco said:
This just in: the NSA spies on the internet and your phone. Ones of people shocked.

This is mostly an NSA activity, and that is what they do. The agency is America's electronic intelligence arm, and with more and more of our enemies being non-state actors, they're flailing around trying to find something to target.

Also:

CNN said:
An author of the Patriot Act -- the legislation used to justify the program -- added he is "extremely disturbed by what appears to be an overbroad interpretation of the act."
WHAT THE HELL DID YOU THINK THEY WERE GOING TO DO WITH IT
Just going to quite this for truth.

I know many Americans don't trust their government, and it's hard to blame them. I don't live there, never will live there, but it just seems like such a backwards place sometimes in terms of actions and words.
 

Goro

New member
Oct 15, 2009
234
0
0
Country
Australia
Security companies capture everything, then discard 99.9% of that as irrelevant. A tiny percentage is further filtered and a teeny-tiny bit is sent to a human to look at, probably without identifying features. You'd divulge more personal information to eBay or any shopping site so they can bimbard you with targeted ads. I'm not threatened by surveillance because I'm not doing anything wrong.
 

Gormech

New member
May 10, 2012
259
0
0
So ... with the tone of a recent thread:

Can we stop pretending that we still/have-ever-had rights?

The only reason the government hasn't tried taking over is because the flaws of it being made up of a bunch of us crazy people has kept it from being stable enough to fight off the backlash of said crazy people for when it would try. We're not really serious about much here. It's like in that whale movie where the reporter's saying the whole country's busy watching 3 whales stuck in the ice while there's 30 wars going on and no-one blinks an eye.


Bottom line: No one (that seems to matter) cares.

And if it seems like I'm going way off topic, I blame the 2liters of soda I just chugged.
 

Aitruis

New member
Mar 4, 2009
223
0
0
fat tony said:
Security companies capture everything, then discard 99.9% of that as irrelevant. A tiny percentage is further filtered and a teeny-tiny bit is sent to a human to look at, probably without identifying features. You'd divulge more personal information to eBay or any shopping site so they can bimbard you with targeted ads. I'm not threatened by surveillance because I'm not doing anything wrong.
I've been seeing quite a bit of this attitude, both in this thread and beyond. I just want to give you guys, especially the international guys, a view from what you could call a "Constitutionalist". Let me start by giving you a rundown of some of the basic ideas Americans such as myself consider highly important, necessary to our freedom, and what *should* be endemic to our very culture:

1. A person is to be presumed innocent, until they are proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, guilty.
2. A person should be protected from search/seizure(taking their stuff) until there is reasonable/probable cause that they have committed a crime.
3. The government should be looking out for the good of it's people, being comprised of the same people, and subject to the same as the people it governs. In other words, a government of the people, for the people, by the people.

Now, let me pose to you a hypothetical scenario. You and your neighbors hire a security company to protect your community. Given this is a small neighborhood, many of your neighbors have been hired as well, for more manpower. Somewhere along the line, this security company starts treating you like crap, out of nowhere and for no reason. They intrude into your house, rifle through your belongings, record your emails and calls, looking for evidence of you committing a crime, even though you haven't. But it's mostly okay, you think, because they aren't *too* intrusive, and their ill-treatment of you hasn't gotten too bad. But now remember that you're paying them to do all this.

That's where people like me shake our heads at those who still have the attitude of "I've got nothing to hide, so I don't care." That's the attitude you should have with a cop at a traffic stop, provided he's following the letter of the law as well. That is not the attitude you should have with your government. Yes, technically you are paying for both the government and the cop, but the police are otherwise necessary for the well-being of your community, and the stop is taking up ten minutes of your time. The government, on the other hand, is spending billions of dollars it could be spending on infrastructure, on crumbling bridges and roads, or on education, raising teachers above poverty lines and moving us back into a worldwide player in the market for educated professionals, rather than the continual slide to ever-growing droves of children that can't even pass already laughable standardized tests.

Instead, billons of dollars, your healthy tax contribution included, are spent on treating you like a potential criminal. I can understand where people get that mentality, I really do. I'm an American, I'm a Verizon customer, but I have yet to physically notice myself being monitored. So I do understand the mentality of, "Well, it's bad, but it's not really affecting my daily life, so it's not all that worth getting worked up about." Well, it is, actually. Because the real problem isn't the surveillance, it's the mentality behind it.

It's the mentality of many in our government that because of the office they hold, they are no longer 'one of them'. In many cases, regardless of whether they say it outright, their actions speak for them. We up here, are going to pass a bunch of laws that make you down there do what we want. It's the mentality of the elected officials and the appointed directors that think, "Hey, we can do all these questionable things, and we can't get in trouble for it, because our laws are decades behind our technology, so it isn't *technically* illegal."

And you, the citizen, are paying for, and enabling, all of it. But we can't stop, because then you're a criminal for not paying taxes. And at this point, we see very few politicians that we can elect to actually change things for the better, because most we do see simply promise that they will to get elected, then ride the paycheck and get nothing done.

That, is why people like me are unhappy about such issues, and you should be as well.