radiation in the fallout universe does not work like it does in the real world. it's not a case of "let's take liberty with science for plot/gameplay reasons" the fallout universe is NOT our own. i mean we also know absorbing enough radiation doesn't make you immortal in the real world and yet in fallout it does. and you might have noticed those microchips we have been using in computers in the last few decades? never happened in fallout. that's the reason why there are no laptops and pip-boys are super rare and make you ultra special, they lack the tech to build smaller computer.Worgen said:There is a certain level of fantasy to any fictional universe but we have more than a few examples of what would happen with a big radiation eruption in the real world and plants retake that shit fast. I'm not even going into the whole, if plants couldn't survive then how could humans and what the hell do people eat, etc etc arguments.teebeeohh said:and people wouldn't be turned into ghouls by radiation, they would just die.Worgen said:How they portray the post apocalyptic setting always bugged me since it wouldn't look like it did in fallout. Plants and trees would have taken over, it wouldn't be a bombed out waste land, it would be green as hell since nothing was there to stop plant growth, the only time it would look like a bombed out waste land would be within 5 years of it happening and probably not even that long.
physics work slightly different in the fallout universe and the lack of plant life is because the background radiation of the nuclear prevents the growth of most plants in the fallout universe. kinda sucks BUT radiation also gives you superpowers so who am i to complain
Dude, I know fallout, I've been playing the games since the first one came out. Its still stupid that its so barren. But that is more on lazy world builders who really wanted a mad max feel than anything else.teebeeohh said:radiation in the fallout universe does not work like it does in the real world. it's not a case of "let's take liberty with science for plot/gameplay reasons" the fallout universe is NOT our own. i mean we also know absorbing enough radiation doesn't make you immortal in the real world and yet in fallout it does. and you might have noticed those microchips we have been using in computers in the last few decades? never happened in fallout. that's the reason why there are no laptops and pip-boys are super rare and make you ultra special, they lack the tech to build smaller computer.Worgen said:There is a certain level of fantasy to any fictional universe but we have more than a few examples of what would happen with a big radiation eruption in the real world and plants retake that shit fast. I'm not even going into the whole, if plants couldn't survive then how could humans and what the hell do people eat, etc etc arguments.teebeeohh said:and people wouldn't be turned into ghouls by radiation, they would just die.Worgen said:How they portray the post apocalyptic setting always bugged me since it wouldn't look like it did in fallout. Plants and trees would have taken over, it wouldn't be a bombed out waste land, it would be green as hell since nothing was there to stop plant growth, the only time it would look like a bombed out waste land would be within 5 years of it happening and probably not even that long.
physics work slightly different in the fallout universe and the lack of plant life is because the background radiation of the nuclear prevents the growth of most plants in the fallout universe. kinda sucks BUT radiation also gives you superpowers so who am i to complain
those are the two main differences, radiation (and nuclear physics in general) are different, allowing for ghouls(and other mutated species), power-armor and laser-weapons. and no microchips because they wanted the computers to look like something form the 50s.
and in case you have played honest hearts you may have noticed that there is a lot more green in that part of the US because it wasn't bombed.
i am also pretty sure they set the in california on purpose because california being a wasteland with high temperatures and a lot of sun where everything is brown is a lot easier to imagine than let's say [insert particularly green part of US here]
Well 125 years ago, we weren't trying to recover from a nuclear war. :/sanquin said:100 years and all the people were able to do is make small, mostly primitive settlements? We went from the invention of the telephone to right now with our computers and such in about 125 years or so. Even with survival being priority, advancement would have been far greater. The world feels more like 10~20 years after the apocalypse.
.
Considering that 50-100 men is considered a major strike force... Yea, the population is probably pretty damn low. I mean, The Legion was supposed to have conquered all of the east and their invasion was like, what.. 500 or so people? Not counting the fact that a lot of those guys were slaves.Random berk said:The population in the Fallout universe is likely a whole lot lower than the real world of the late 19th century though, and probably isn't increasing at a rate any higher than it would have in the Dark ages. That would probably slow technological and cultural advancement quite a bit.sanquin said:Eh, I wouldn't look too much into it. I mean, a TON of things don't make sense in the fallout universe. Food/medical supplies that are still usable/edible from before the apocalypse? As if that's possible.
100 years and all the people were able to do is make small, mostly primitive settlements? We went from the invention of the telephone to right now with our computers and such in about 125 years or so. Even with survival being priority, advancement would have been far greater. The world feels more like 10~20 years after the apocalypse.
For that matter, laser guns, but no working transportation? How does that work?
Etc etc. It's a game. An rpg at that. Just sit back and enjoy.
No, but I can tell you the key ingredient is ammonia, which is also the key ingredient in 409, Fantastik, and most other basic houshold cleaners. Worst comes to worst, you could actually clean your windows with watered down urine. It's happened in various places in the past.Slycne said:For example, could you tell me what the chemical composition of Windex is?
Well, are those in-game population numbers, or lore numbers?Nikolaz72 said:Considering that 50-100 men is considered a major strike force... Yea, the population is probably pretty damn low. I mean, The Legion was supposed to have conquered all of the east and their invasion was like, what.. 500 or so people? Not counting the fact that a lot of those guys were slaves.
Oh, and 20 or so people make up a settlement. A Settlement. Even in pre-historic time settlements had around 75-100 people. This suggests that the world population is lower than the human population in ancient times, when 'we' were still hunter/gatherers.
Apparently its lore numbers. If it was ingame the final battle had like what, 20 people in total? xD. But yea, there are settlements with like 5 people living theme... When you think about it anything below a settlement of 100 would be unable to sustain itself for a longer period of time. Which is shown by the fact that there are a ton of abandoned settlements.SajuukKhar said:Well, are those in-game population numbers, or lore numbers?Nikolaz72 said:Considering that 50-100 men is considered a major strike force... Yea, the population is probably pretty damn low. I mean, The Legion was supposed to have conquered all of the east and their invasion was like, what.. 500 or so people? Not counting the fact that a lot of those guys were slaves.
Oh, and 20 or so people make up a settlement. A Settlement. Even in pre-historic time settlements had around 75-100 people. This suggests that the world population is lower than the human population in ancient times, when 'we' were still hunter/gatherers.
In-game population numbers are stupidly small because of scale, Megaton had what? like 20 people in it in-game? in reality it probably had more then 100.
It was designed based on the 50's preconception of what a nuclear wasteland would look like. That is it's style. In the making of fallout 3 they state something along the lines of "we know that there probably would have been nuclear winter but we liked the 50's image, a dry wasteland".Worgen said:How they portray the post apocalyptic setting always bugged me since it wouldn't look like it did in fallout. Plants and trees would have taken over, it wouldn't be a bombed out waste land, it would be green as hell since nothing was there to stop plant growth, the only time it would look like a bombed out waste land would be within 5 years of it happening and probably not even that long.
I think it was more that they wanted a mad max type of setting. Its hard to really show you having to fight off crazed bandits all the time when your in a lush woodland setting.xXGeckoXx said:It was designed based on the 50's preconception of what a nuclear wasteland would look like. That is it's style. In the making of fallout 3 they state something along the lines of "we know that there probably would have been nuclear winter but we liked the 50's image, a dry wasteland".Worgen said:How they portray the post apocalyptic setting always bugged me since it wouldn't look like it did in fallout. Plants and trees would have taken over, it wouldn't be a bombed out waste land, it would be green as hell since nothing was there to stop plant growth, the only time it would look like a bombed out waste land would be within 5 years of it happening and probably not even that long.
Two words: ambiance and set-dressing. Visual disorder gives the area a feeling of disjointedness and destruction. What better way to reinforce the idea of a post-apocalyptic world than broken stuff piled up?Ezekiel T Bluff said:Ah, my first topic...
So I was playing New Vegas last night, and started thinking:
New Vegas is set 100 and something years after Faloout 1. So the people inhabiting the world are present in that world at least 100 years (ghouls even longer since they originated from Vault 15, which was not closed). So said people live their lives normaly: they cook, they farm, they breed, they have water (irradiated, but still), they even have electricity. So the thing is: WHY DON'T THEY CLEAN? And by that I mean not just themselves, they don't even clean their houses or around their houses.
I know I wouldn't want to live in a house full of broken radios, broken glass, with a broken refrigirator thrown out some 200 years ago sitting outside my front door.
Comments? Let your voices be heard.