Objectification? Sexualization? What do the ladies think?

Recommended Videos

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
Sort of an odd thought on this topic: I think of attempted sexual manipulation as an affront to my person. If a woman is using her sexuality in such a way as to gain my attention, my assets, or any sort of advantage over me, in any setting, I resent her actions immensely - whether or not she succeeds.

There seems to be this notion that a person should be allowed to project whatever ideas or concepts she/he chooses, and that my only options for reaction are "positive" or "indifferent". That's not how nature works. That's not how the universe works. Why in the world should I respond to an overt attempt to override my own agency with anything but agitation?

This is why I tend to hate when a woman projects a ton of sexuality and is subsequently upset by negative feedback. She attempted emotional or physiological manipulation of another sentient being. In the event of failure, assuming said being recognized her attempt, she has no grounds for complaining about a negative reaction.

Edit: a negative *commensurate" reaction. Should go without saying given the nature/universe comments, but I don't want anyone getting the wrong idea.
 

bigfatcarp93

New member
Mar 26, 2012
1,052
0
0
valium said:
Only wanting a female's view on a subject...

equally not alright, just putting that out there.
Erm... how so? How is wanting to ask a woman's opinion "not alright?" I don't think discrimination is really a problem when it's something as trivial and practical and whose point-of-view you want on a subject...
 

Ikasury

New member
May 15, 2013
297
0
0
FieryTrainwreck said:
Sort of an odd thought on this topic: I think of attempted sexual manipulation as an affront to my person. If a woman is using her sexuality in such a way as to gain my attention, my assets, or any sort of advantage over me, in any setting, I resent her actions immensely - whether or not she succeeds.

There seems to be this notion that a person should be allowed to project whatever ideas or concepts she/he chooses, and that my only options for reaction are "positive" or "indifferent". That's not how nature works. That's not how the universe works. Why in the world should I respond to an overt attempt to override my own agency with anything but agitation?

This is why I tend to hate when a woman projects a ton of sexuality and is subsequently upset by negative feedback. She attempted emotional or physiological manipulation of another sentient being. In the event of failure, assuming said being recognized her attempt, she has no grounds for complaining about a negative reaction.

Edit: a negative *commensurate" reaction. Should go without saying given the nature/universe comments, but I don't want anyone getting the wrong idea.
*golf clap*

i'm not being snarky, i'm being serious... this kinda like my questioning of 'why does it HAVE to be sexy in the first place?' that's all nothing but base manipulation... i find it funny when it fails XD
 

Darken12

New member
Apr 16, 2011
1,061
0
0
FieryTrainwreck said:
Sort of an odd thought on this topic: I think of attempted sexual manipulation as an affront to my person. If a woman is using her sexuality in such a way as to gain my attention, my assets, or any sort of advantage over me, in any setting, I resent her actions immensely - whether or not she succeeds.

There seems to be this notion that a person should be allowed to project whatever ideas or concepts she/he chooses, and that my only options for reaction are "positive" or "indifferent". That's not how nature works. That's not how the universe works. Why in the world should I respond to an overt attempt to override my own agency with anything but agitation?

This is why I tend to hate when a woman projects a ton of sexuality and is subsequently upset by negative feedback. She attempted emotional or physiological manipulation of another sentient being. In the event of failure, assuming said being recognized her attempt, she has no grounds for complaining about a negative reaction.

Edit: a negative *commensurate" reaction. Should go without saying given the nature/universe comments, but I don't want anyone getting the wrong idea.
This is actually a problem that a lot of feminists try to fight against: the idea that a woman is only sexy/sexualised for the benefit of a man. Some people like acting or looking a certain way for their own benefit. Some people like putting on costumes because they like the way they look in them, not as a way to get attention. Some people flex their muscles in front of a mirror because they like to admire themselves. Some people dress in sexy clothes because they like the way they look in them.

And some people act sultry and seductive not because they want to manipulate others, but because they feel a "thrill" of "adventure" (or naughtiness, perhaps) when they act that way. This is evidenced by people acting seductively with friends, married people, or people that they have no intention of seducing or manipulating. They aren't doing it because they want to manipulate others, they do it for the same reason some people enjoy acting or performing.

And the idea that a woman is sexy only for the benefit of a man is, at the end of the day, harmful, because it denies her the ability to be sexy for herself, to derive enjoyment from being sexy.

Obviously, this is a somewhat controversial matter.
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Gatx said:
And not response to what you said, but the reaction that if a woman DOESN'T act like a badass man then she's a "weak female character" (I think on TV Tropes it's referred to as Real Women Don't Wear Dresses or thereabouts) is something I dislike.
I dont know what is worse. No badass like a man = weak character, or the fact that there are people like Anita that dismiss previous acomplishments of females as SOON they get into DiD territory. Which leads to the following unfortunate implication: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DefiledForever
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Ikasury said:
but here's the thing, while i agree with MovieBob's thing about EMPOWERING-SEXUALITY-IN-WOMEN-RAWR-HAWT!! i see that a lot, and funnily enough, yea, its USUALLY the 'witch' character, he says 'can't think of another female character like Bayonetta'... i automatically think of Lulu (FFX) and Morrigan (DA:O) but yea, they aren't 'main characters' so sure, but i was also giggling and remembering Rayne from BloodRayne, as in the 'good' one, not the crappy sequel and whatever else XD but even there she was more of sexy-gimicky with massive amounts of Gainaxing and lesbian overtones... *shrugs* i'll just have to buy the game i suppose and test this out, see if we truly do have an awesome female-MC and not just a Female-Dante... honestly i'd probably be good either way XD
Well, its Bob we are talking about. It will be a miracle if he EVER plays a videogame in its life to expand its knowledge. Otherwise he wouldn't have defended Other M, seen the Prime trilogy as "just another fucking FPS series and just as creatively bankrupt as those".
 

Ikasury

New member
May 15, 2013
297
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Ikasury said:
but here's the thing, while i agree with MovieBob's thing about EMPOWERING-SEXUALITY-IN-WOMEN-RAWR-HAWT!! i see that a lot, and funnily enough, yea, its USUALLY the 'witch' character, he says 'can't think of another female character like Bayonetta'... i automatically think of Lulu (FFX) and Morrigan (DA:O) but yea, they aren't 'main characters' so sure, but i was also giggling and remembering Rayne from BloodRayne, as in the 'good' one, not the crappy sequel and whatever else XD but even there she was more of sexy-gimicky with massive amounts of Gainaxing and lesbian overtones... *shrugs* i'll just have to buy the game i suppose and test this out, see if we truly do have an awesome female-MC and not just a Female-Dante... honestly i'd probably be good either way XD
Well, its Bob we are talking about. It will be a miracle if he EVER plays a videogame in its life to expand its knowledge. Otherwise he wouldn't have defended Other M, seen the Prime trilogy as "just another fucking FPS series and just as creatively bankrupt as those".
guh... i'm starting to think only female gamers bother to play games for something a bit 'more' then SHOOT-THEM-BITCHES-UP!!-WAKA-WAKA!! honestly probably the only FPS i REALLY liked was S.T.A.L.K.E.R. as in prior to that i'd tried other MS FPSs like the holy grail of Halo and just went 'meh'... and i'm playing a dude in that, killing dudes, hell i don't even think there's a SINGLE female in that game yet i'm totally okay with that because it makes sense IN CONTEXT!!

but my list of 'good' games by story standards has kind of dried up since pre-Y2K and next-gen consoles started making everything 'pretty' instead of 'interesting' or 'deep'... but that does pander more to guys who don't have the attention span for 'plot'... ME i liked for its depth and getting to play a more equal-realistic female MC but when you really get into the grit of the game its 'Insert-Sue shoots a lot of stuff and we all live, yay!' sure my head-canon can fluff that out a lot but that's the real gist of it... god i think the last 'series' of games with actual in-depth make you think plot that wasn't an SMT title was Xenosaga, and even then that was basing off of XENOGEARS!! (one of the greatest things to ever exist and is really just an interactive novel) and even then a quick swish of Occum's Razor could kill it... then again i think Occum's Razor could kill anything at this point...

guh... at this point titillation is really just the easy way to make money, gender aside, its just there to make it all 'look' pretty so you'll buy it and they don't care after they have your money...
 

Ikasury

New member
May 15, 2013
297
0
0
DioWallachia said:
Gatx said:
And not response to what you said, but the reaction that if a woman DOESN'T act like a badass man then she's a "weak female character" (I think on TV Tropes it's referred to as Real Women Don't Wear Dresses or thereabouts) is something I dislike.
I dont know what is worse. No badass like a man = weak character, or the fact that there are people like Anita that dismiss previous acomplishments of females as SOON they get into DiD territory. Which leads to the following unfortunate implication: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DefiledForever
*whines* oh lets not go there T.T

okay we totally should, as it is kinda the basis for the whole 'why can't we have a female MC WITH an actual relationship' since for some reason even if its 'DefiledForever' or not, just the sheer IDEA for guys that 'oh no, she had a life before you' she therefore can't be pure or approachable or is then delegated to the 'bad girl' box is just a whole set of 'really? -.-' on its own... what's worse is us women are actually probably the biggest offenders of this trope, least from my experience... and it all explodes from there! that's another one of those 'lines' thats hard to not only pin down but figure out if its been crossed or not... *sigh* women make things complicated is about all i can say... snark
 

DioWallachia

New member
Sep 9, 2011
1,546
0
0
Ikasury said:
guh... at this point titillation is really just the easy way to make money, gender aside, its just there to make it all 'look' pretty so you'll buy it and they don't care after they have your money...
You know, when when not only Indie games but FREEWARE has better plots and gameplay than your AAA products, then you should probably rethink your profession.

Case in point: a Freeware that its a combination of "System Shock" and "Deus Ex" in gameplay, with graphics of "Another World" (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/VideoGame/AnotherWorld), and a plot that deconstructs the "lone warrior against all odds" with healthy doses of PTSD on a girl forced to survive in a dead world. That game is IJI.
http://www.remar.se/daniel/games.php
 

Terramax

New member
Jan 11, 2008
3,747
0
0
Ikasury said:
why not just make kick-ass females, not male-proxies, actual women? why is that so freakin' hard and scary?
I think it's because, a lot of the time, so-called 'kick-ass females' are obnoxious. I mean, REALLY obnoxious. Indeed, you can say the same for kick-ass men, but it's a stereotype done to death so much, you can do it ironically. More often than not, you're not supposed to find them relatable i.e. Kratos.

Hardened women in real life tend to be the most obnoxious, annoying human beings in the world. They tend to be.... wait a second, they usually tend to be feminists! Without a sense of humour, without anything intelligent to say (in terms of discussion as opposed to being intelligent, period), very mouthy, overly confrontational, and overly sensitive. Just... nothing to like about them, no matter what angle or like you see them from.

I do agree there should be more gutsy women in games. But IMO the balance is really hard to pull off. My personal favourite heroines are Heather from Silent Hill 3, Victoria McPherson from Still Life (if you want a story-driven game with a gutsy heroine, you NEED to play this game, if you haven't already), and Ayame from the Tenchu series. All of these women are smart, seem to have a goal you want them to accomplish, and at least the slightest bit relatable.

As a guy, I actually enjoy playing as female characters in games more. I will openly admit that this is partially due to the T&A, with games like, say, P.N.03 for the Gamecube. But as mentioned above, playing as a more bold women, when done right, can be really refreshing also.

When I play as male characters, I'm not usually into the muscle-head characters either. I can think of Guts from 'Sword of Berserk', and the two leads from the Army of Two games, but mainly because of the comedy banter between the pair of them.

Thing is, there is ALWAYS going to be T&A in gaming, as long as men play games, period. Because we're men. Even if you changed it so that every single game in the world was altered so that no men or women characters were sexualised in any way, men would still find a way of sexualising them in their minds. Because we're men. That's what we do.

I'm not saying this is a free-pass for all games to sexualise women. It's not. It's all about context with any game you play. But whenever I read the words 'level the playing field', I watch to *****-slap these people. Because the playing field will NEVER be even. Men and women are different in what we find sexually stimulating, how often, and how much. There is never going to be a balance. Hence, we should review each and every game in its own context, rather than blasting the whole industry on the matter.

here's a question of my own, anyone think that these male-oriented mentalities put into games may be effecting female-gamers perspectives on what's 'hot' and what's 'not'? since we have to play in the mindset of 'dudes' all the time, i'm honestly starting to think this is effecting my normal capacity to even be 'attracted' to men, quite honestly i recognize 'tits' more then i do 'pecks' as something that should be 'hot' because of the subliminal everything that's geared towards 'men', but me as a woman just has to 'deal with it'? lame...
I think, yes, women must be affected by the way they see women portrayed in video games, or should I say, in the media as a whole. But I have something to ask on the matter also. How many women's magazines and TV shows also affect what you what's hot and what's not? I'm not being funny, but you ask most men, they don't want their women caked in make-up. And yet, I read a statistic a few years back, stating about 65% of all women wouldn't leave the house without makeup on (I believe it was Cosmopolitan magazine, which I do read when I have the chance, which has been a few times as my whole family consists of women).

Where are we drawing the line? Who does have the right to decide what's hot and what's not?

i hope they start making more female oriented games, then you dudes can feel all weird about being 'gay' and i can tell you to 'get over it' honestly...
Do you genuinely think we don't have to deal with this already? I'm sorry, but whenever women say this, it does come off as a little ignorant.

I've worked in several female dominated workplaces, surrounded by posters of semi-naked, buff and gorgeous looking guys hung on the walls, and had to sit and listen to an endless number conversations from women co-workers on the issue of what kind of man they find sexually attractive. In fact, in my experience in over 10 jobs in the last 10 years, I can safely say, here in the UK, women talk about their sexual preference in men way more than men talk about their preference in women!

Here's a question I'd like to ask you - how many women do you know who specifically, or at least partially, watch films and television shows for the hunks in them? Because I know so many in the UK that only saw High School Musical and Twilight, or TV shows like The Only Way is Essex, solely for the male ass. How many women genuinely watch a movie starring Johnny Depp or Brad Pitt, solely for their acting ability?

I know video games are very male dominated, but what do you have to say for other mediums like magazines, television, and film, where there are plenty of sources objectifying men? Do you think it has an affect on the male psych?

On a side note: I'm intrigued to know why you like Aya Brea so much? I've only played through the start of PE2, and most of 3rd Birthday, but I found her to be completely usesless in terms of character in 3rd Birthday.

P.S. I hope none of this post comes off as offensive to you. I think, genuinely, you have some very insightful things to say on the matter.
 

Darken12

New member
Apr 16, 2011
1,061
0
0
DioWallachia said:
OP, Does the opinion of a gay man can help?
If we're posting reference material, I know of a music video that possesses clear examples of the "straight female gaze". Just the first few seconds or so give people a pretty clear idea of what it means to actually objectify men (and why it's hilarious that people say "oh Kratos is objectified because he's shirtless!"):


It's still not on the same level as how women get objectified (there are almost no crotch or ass shots, and the camera keeps a certain distance from the body), but it's definitely a great start.
 

APersonHere

New member
Mar 12, 2013
25
0
0
I think it's because, a lot of the time, so-called 'kick-ass females' are obnoxious. I mean, REALLY obnoxious. Indeed, you can say the same for kick-ass men, but it's a stereotype done to death so much, you can do it ironically.
I agree. Too many games/shows seem to have this idea that strong female lead must be defined in the first 5 minutes of the games by having some kind of obligatory "beat up the sexist misogynists to show how truly independent you are!" kind of scene... as others have pointed out before me.

Hardened women in real life tend to be the most obnoxious, annoying human beings in the world. They tend to be.... wait a second, they usually tend to be feminists! Without a sense of humour, without anything intelligent to say (in terms of discussion as opposed to being intelligent, period), very mouthy, overly confrontational, and overly sensitive. Just... nothing to like about them, no matter what angle or like you see them from.
In this I disagree. There's one definition of feminism: gender equality! ... but a million conflicting implementations. There are many women out in the world who will equally say "screw you, misogynist men who want to keep me in the kitchen" and "screw you, misandrist women who think I should never be in any kitchen".

How many women's magazines and TV shows also affect what you what's hot and what's not?[/quote[

...but you also have to look at how many CEOs and board members of these so-called 'women's media' are actually men who will benefit by telling women that this is what women should do because 'women' say so.

I've worked in several female dominated workplaces, surrounded by posters of semi-naked, buff and gorgeous looking guys hung on the walls, and had to sit and listen to an endless number conversations from women co-workers on the issue of what kind of man they find sexually attractive.
Just the other day as I was grabbing coffee at work I heard a group of four women talking about a date one of them had that evening. The conversation went as follows: "I don't really like him." Another woman: "But hey, free movie and dinner!" That's a form of objectification (walking wallets). And there are genuine feminists who will call this kind of gender inequality out for both ways (take Cathy Young for example) but these people seem to be in the minority.
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
bigfatcarp93 said:
valium said:
Only wanting a female's view on a subject...

equally not alright, just putting that out there.
Erm... how so? How is wanting to ask a woman's opinion "not alright?" I don't think discrimination is really a problem when it's something as trivial and practical and whose point-of-view you want on a subject...
well what about gay or bi men? i think they're just as qualified as a hetero or bi woman
 

Gethsemani_v1legacy

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,552
0
0
matthew_lane said:
APersonHere said:
In this I disagree. There's one definition of feminism: gender equality! ... but a million conflicting implementations.
I'm sorry but i'm going to have to disagree with you, Feminism is gender equality in exactly the same way atheism plus is atheism & North Korea's facist regime is government.

Sure somewhere in there they all contain that kernel of that thing, but its usually buried under a shit load of other stuff. Take feminism for instance, it requires that one absorb a whole heap of bullshit uncritically, including patriarchy theory, equality of outcome (which sounds nice, but its not actually equality), self victim narrative, denying human rights & social marxism.

Yet i can be be an advocate for womens rights (as i am), while also being adamantly oppossed to all the bullshit that makes up feminism.
Nice strawman. I wonder, Mr. Lane, have you ever actually read any feminist literature, attended a seminar on feminism or gender studies? Or do you just get all your ideas on feminism from spearhead and reddit? Because none of what you said "feminism requires" is actually what feminism 'requires'.

I think you also understand the difference between Kratos and Conan and Red Sonja and Julie from Heavy Metal FAKK2. Kratos and Conan are not sexualized as much as they are pandering to the male power fantasy of the strong man who can overcome any obstacle. Their shirtless, loincloth wearing appearance is meant to show us their physique and muscles as well as reinforce the point that these are "primal" men, they are not bound by societies expectation of civility because they live by their own determination and morality. In essence, they are power fantasies.

Red Sonja and Julie, meanwhile, are capable women who happens to be wearing chainmail bikinis and BDSM-straps respectively. They are capable warriors, both are the protagonists of their respective work of fiction and both are dressed and designed in a way that's meant to evoke male desire. If you disagree, feel free to tell me how a chainmail bikini and a photo models/anorexia patients body can be constituted to represent a female power fantasy in works of fiction primarily focused on physical conflict.
 

Batou667

New member
Oct 5, 2011
2,238
0
0
spartandude said:
bigfatcarp93 said:
valium said:
Only wanting a female's view on a subject...

equally not alright, just putting that out there.
Erm... how so? How is wanting to ask a woman's opinion "not alright?" I don't think discrimination is really a problem when it's something as trivial and practical and whose point-of-view you want on a subject...
well what about gay or bi men? i think they're just as qualified as a hetero or bi woman
OP was asking for female perspectives though - surely a gay/bi man doesn't have any insights into the female sex, any more than a straight guy does?
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
matthew_lane said:
No actually it doesn't.
But were these characters really designed with females in mind? Kratos may be wearing very little, but he isn't exactly handsome or sensual by any means. He doesn't have an ounce of romanticism or sexuality in his character. Females wearing that little, on the other hand, quite clearly have sexuality in mind.

Of course the look of the armor depends on the style, I played an MMO called Final Fantasy XI for a long time and while there was skimpy armor on females, the great thing about their design was it didn't vary greatly from male to female. So there was a type of leg armor known as the "subligar," and the subligar basically amounted to metal underpants with knee pads. While this was a bit revealing on the ladies, the male characters were subjected to the same amount of skin showing.