No friggin way, I'd love a movie about the Bat hunting down predator through the gritty streets of Gotham, preferably without all his special equipment. It'd be a suspenseful action movie and I'd watch it.Catnip1024 said:Yeah, I have to admit, of all the recent reboots and spin-offs, this does seem the least offensive and most likely to be alright.
At least, until they do Batman vs Predator.
The first one was pretty well received and is a classical heist movie, but the second and third did suck rather badly.axlryder said:Sure, whatever. The original series ran its course. It's not like it's a super iconic IP or anything. The whole premise of the original was a heist movie with a gimmick, so it makes sense that they'd try to reboot it with another gimmick.
The casting mix is a bit odd (by which I mean all the names are well known and decent actresses, but I don't have the foggiest what kind of chemistry they'll have) and it basically drips of "LOOK HOW PROGRESSIVE I AM!" (which most often seems to be used as cover for bad writing or bad design, depending on which media we're talking about).shrekfan246 said:What reason is there that it couldn't work?
Yeah, probably. Clooney's 11 had, well, eleven dudes as the main group, then Julia Roberts as the love interest and Andy Garcia as the bad guy. So, 12 dudes out of 13.Doggular said:I don't imagine those eight women are the entirety of the cast, just the main characters.omega 616 said:I'm not really upset, it's not like the Oceans films are great, they are an ok way to kill a bit of time but storm in a tea cup and I do like that women are getting more lime light, would a male in these films hurt though? Even just as a secondary character.
Also what most people think of as "the original" aka the Cloney/Pitt one, is actually a remake to begin with. The original Ocean's Eleven is a Rat Pack vanity project.axlryder said:Sure, whatever. The original series ran its course. It's not like it's a super iconic IP or anything. The whole premise of the original was a heist movie with a gimmick, so it makes sense that they'd try to reboot it with another gimick.
The Sinatra one was okay, but I'd say that the 2001 version is quite a lot better. But then again, Cloney is movie magic.DeimosMasque said:Also what most people think of as "the original" aka the Cloney/Pitt one, is actually a remake to begin with. The original Ocean's Eleven is a Rat Pack vanity project.
This captures my main concern quite well, the movie needs an Ocean to make it viable, you can't have Ocean's Eight without someone called Ocean. Quite odd that there isn't more out there since it has been in development since 2015.Ihateregistering1 said:So how is it even going to be a spin off? Is Anne Hathaway Danny Ocean's daughter or something?
Well its the fourth movie in a series with steadily declining box office numbers, and lacks Clooney, Pitt, and Damon rubbing their "our movies always do good" juice on it.shrekfan246 said:What reason is there that it couldn't work?
Well, I think it largely depends on who's starting the "Look, all-female!" conversation.VaporWare said:As I've said before of Ghostbusters 2016, if the first and best part of your pitch is 'the same thing as this other thing but with different genital configurations', you /don't have a pitch/.
Nothing says this can't be a good film, any more than Ghostbusters /could/ have been, but if the sex of the cast is their brightest talking point it doesn't speak well of their content or plans. Not because women are bad content, but because we actually do live in a world where 'it stars women!' is as vapid a statement as 'it stars men!' It says they have nothing substantive to say about their /own damn work/.
If it stars humans, no shit the cast is going to feature one or both of those things.
Women have had leading roles for a long time now, including ensembles like Ghostbusters or Oceans [n]. It's not actually a novelty element, and it shouldn't be treated as one.
Genital configuration is only content if you're shooting porn.
Really? I mean maybe the Rat Pack one. I remember the casting process being a big mess for the first Oceans movie.KissingSunlight said:The main appeal of the Ocean's movies are the chemistry of the actors who are friends with each other in real life.
Why eleven for the first movie? Is it because 1 is a phallic shape and every guy has two penises? I really don't think too much thought should be put into the number, perhaps the studio could only find 6 actors, one singer, and a rapper, willing to play in the movie, or perhaps the budget didn't allow for more than 8 members in the crew, or perhap the idea of vertical infinity simply amused the writer, in the end we might never know.KissingSunlight said:Since no one else asked, I will. Why eight? Is it because the traditional shape of a woman is the figure 8?
I know that George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, and Julia Roberts have worked with each other before. I believe they are friends off camera. I don't remember specifically about any casting problems other than scheduling.Chanticoblues said:Really? I mean maybe the Rat Pack one. I remember the casting process being a big mess for the first Oceans movie.KissingSunlight said:The main appeal of the Ocean's movies are the chemistry of the actors who are friends with each other in real life.
I was being snarky. However, I wouldn't be surprised if they impose an actress over the number 8 in the movie trailer.shinyelf said:Why eleven for the first movie? Is it because 1 is a phallic shape and every guy has two penises? I really don't think too much thought should be put into the number, perhaps the studio could only find 6 actors, one singer, and a rapper, willing to play in the movie, or perhaps the budget didn't allow for more than 8 members in the crew, or perhap the idea of vertical infinity simply amused the writer, in the end we might never know.KissingSunlight said:Since no one else asked, I will. Why eight? Is it because the traditional shape of a woman is the figure 8?