Official Hyrule Historia

Recommended Videos

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
This is a lot of writing about my opinion on something I very much dislike about the Zelda series. If you have no interest in reading that much about this topic, I urge you to skip this thread. XD hehe, okay thanks. Love ya.



If you the readers like the Hyrule Historia that's cool, go ahead and like it if you want but I felt it changed the entire mindset of the series and the expectations people have for future games forever.

I didn't play much of Skyward Sword. I dunno, very early in that game I realized I didn't really care. Something about it really rubbed me wrong. I dunno maybe I was just not in a mood to allow myself to not see the obvious tired Ocarina of Time formula play out again.

Oh look it's some bully that likes Saria - Hello Mido.
Oh look it's some girl that likes Link - Hello Saria. (How funny that Zelda plays the role of Saria in this game)
Oh look it's some non-human girl that shall follow Link around and tell him about stuff. - Hello Navi.

Then all the cooky zaney citizens of the town who looks awkward or acted awkward yet this is totally normal in Zeldaland. It just felt like that was their point of existence first and then whatever their zaney-ness was came 2nd. It felt too much like they were just following status quo, by the numbers. By the time I got to the forest area I had officially stopped caring. I put it down, told myself I'd pick it up again later with new eyes and mindset and never did. I never saw any of the bosses in that game.

On top of that, the game also had a lot of the Offical Hyrule Historia hype around it which put a really bad taste in my mouth. I didn't care for the Historia at all. I can at this point say I hate it. I think it intentionally was made to take away a lot of the charm in the series. I liked it when Link was meant to be looked at as the same guy re-imagined.

And it was cute that other people had their own fun connect the dot time lines. It was fun. It was interesting to read up on to see their reasoning then look up another person's and look at their reasoning.

Once they made it official it changed the series a lot. Oh so, despite none of the game prior even hinting that this is how it works but instead specifically intending for us to imagine Link as the same character, telling the same story but in a new interesting way. The timeline thing is how it always actually was the whole time? Oh... ok I guess.

It was like Nintendo saw other people having fun, thought it would be fun to make their own, then shoved it in everyone's face and said "This is the right one, all of yours are wrong, haha you putz." Thus killing the fun dead in its tracks. Now people who 1 of the reasons they enjoyed Zelda was playing this little game of 'connect the dot' no longer could since others will just roll their eyes and go "Yeah but Nintendo already made an official time line." and now the game has become. "Let's wait and see where Nintendo will put the new game?"

The funny thing is, everyone doesn't see it that way. They were like "Oh man I was close haha. Never thought they'd add a 3rd branch to Ocarina of Time." and then dropped it, not even seeming to notice the entire series was changed forever with a mindset with less in it. No longer is that a game, now it's expectation that affects how people view the game.

The thing is, with Hyrule Warriors and Zelda U coming out, I have a feeling both of these games will get bad receptions from those people because now the game is no longer. "Oh lets see how I logically feel the series connects together." it is now. "Oh I wonder where Nintendo will place this on the timeline. I hope they don't wait 15 years or intentionally make gaps that will be filled later." If they don't publicly announce where they go very soon then the game will not meet that expectation people have of the games and they will start on a negative foundation which which will lead to a negative mindset that will lead to a negative response to aspects of the game which will lead to an overall negative experience. I know this could happen because the same exact thing happened to Wind Waker.

and yes I'm aware that is basically exactly what happened to me for Skyward Sword. The irony is not lost on me.

Maybe not both Zelda U and Hyrule Warriors. Hyrule Warriors will likely take the bulk of that realization of the masses in time for Zelda U to come out. Maybe that's why Hyrule Warriors exists? Maybe that's why this is the first game to try something risky with the combination efforts with Dynasty Warriors. If it works cool, if it doesn't then it still buffered the backlash Hyrule Historia will surely have for a lot of people on the next game in the series following its existence. So they can just jumble all the dislike into a ball and blame Hyrule Warriors as a gimmicky bad idea and we'll just pretend it never existed and audiences will have no idea just how much they were manipulated.

That bothers me because I'm very much looking forward to Hyrule Warriors. I love Zelda, Midna and Cia in this game. They look cool and I can't wait to play. I told myself I wouldn't buy a game console until 4 games I wanted were out or being release and Hyrule Warriors was 1 of those games. I wouldn't own a Wii U right now if it wasn't for Hyrule Warriors and then I would have came very late to the Mario Kart Party.

I couldn't yet care less about Zelda U, the trailer showed nothing. Why should I be excited over nothing? I'm sure I'll be excited later but right now I don't care. XD I was the same way when Twilight Princess was coming out, I didn't care either and Twilight Princess is 1 of the 3 games that toggles consistently between my favorite is in the series.

I will say this though, with the Hyrule Historia being an official part of the Zelda series now. Zelda U better have an optional female Link to play as. It's what everyone wanted at E3, it better happen and it better not be held out on for the game after Zelda U as an idea to consider. Everyone wanted it and now there's no reason not to have it because it is official that this isn't the same guy we loved in Ocarina of Time but some Jack-ass I have no emotional investment in. He's no longer Link but some silent audience avatar like Pokemon. They better start making Link customizable and I will have a lot less respect for Nintendo if they don't for Zelda U but DO add customization in the proceeding game. It will show they took our request and held onto it to ensure they have something to help sell the next game in the series and I despise that way of thinking. It happens a lot in Pokemon and and it happens a lot in Call of Duty and it's disgusting to think they are withholding our enjoyment for profit and so they don't have to think as hard when the next game comes out.

So yeah. <.< Not a fan of the Official Hyrule Historia and by extension Skyward Sword which chose to make it canon. I never made those timelines like other people, I never saw Zelda games that way. I saw them the way they seemed to intended. A retelling of the same story in a different way. Now Ocarina of Time formula games just seem lazy. Oh, so this IS IN FACT officially a new story with a new hero but you're just choosing to tell it in the same tired way. Yeah, no thanks. Wake me up when you care about your games again.
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
I agree with your thoughts on Zelda U, the trailer didn't show anything other than nice graphics and Link wearing a different version his Wind Waker pajamas, oh and the weird bow thing. The rest were just promises

as for Link being customizable, male or female, etc. I've grown indifferent to the argument. You see Link has always been a blank sheet, from the very first game the idea of Link was for the player to portray themselves as Link. So Link never really had a personality and from Link's Awakening forward all the games have had a similar formula. So technically this blank state does work perfectly for establishing a male or female Link... as long as they don't oversexualize either one. I don't know how I'd feel about a Link with giant knockers :S

there is a rumor going around that a female Link or Aryll will be an unlockable and playable character in Hyrule Warriors. But honestly that sounds too good to be true :(

still my question remains, other than the "official time line" what did Hyrule Historia ruin again? I say it in quotations because that page also says that the timeline is subject to change and so at most it's just a place holder so that fans can make their own theories AND discuss more Zelda theories with each other. Seems to me that your problem is more with Skyward Sword following the OoT formula or Twilight Princess both of those games are basically the same. How you view the games should in no way shape or form impact your enjoyment of it, so saying something like "I don't like this because I always viewed it as a reboot and now that I know it isn't a reboot it sucks" well that just sounds weird. So what if it isn't a reboot do you like it? If you do then carry on playing and having fun! If you don't like it, as was your case with Skyward Sword, then stop playing it and try the next one, If you can't enjoy any future titles because whatever reason then stop playing the series, it's not for you. Don't blame the fandom or the lore.
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
GZGoten said:
I agree with your thoughts on Zelda U, the trailer didn't show anything other than nice graphics and Link wearing a different version his Wind Waker pajamas, oh and the weird bow thing. The rest were just promises

as for Link being customizable, male or female, etc. I've grown indifferent to the argument. You see Link has always been a blank sheet, from the very first game the idea of Link was for the player to portray themselves as Link. So Link never really had a personality and from Link's Awakening forward all the games have had a similar formula. So technically this blank state does work perfectly for establishing a male or female Link... as long as they don't oversexualize either one. I don't know how I'd feel about a Link with giant knockers :S

there is a rumor going around that a female Link or Aryll will be an unlockable and playable character in Hyrule Warriors. But honestly that sounds too good to be true :(

still my question remains, other than the "official time line" what did Hyrule Historia ruin again? I say it in quotations because that page also says that the timeline is subject to change and so at most it's just a place holder so that fans can make their own theories AND discuss more Zelda theories with each other. Seems to me that your problem is more with Skyward Sword following the OoT formula or Twilight Princess both of those games are basically the same. How you view the games should in no way shape or form impact your enjoyment of it, so saying something like "I don't like this because I always viewed it as a reboot and now that I know it isn't a reboot it sucks" well that just sounds weird. So what if it isn't a reboot do you like it? If you do then carry on playing and having fun! If you don't like it, as was your case with Skyward Sword, then stop playing it and try the next one, If you can't enjoy any future titles because whatever reason then stop playing the series, it's not for you. Don't blame the fandom or the lore.
: ) It's not so much ruined. It changed the mindest of the series. The timeline has always been an ambiguously present in the series but now that it's official fan of the series are just like. "Ok where does this go in the time line."

Also that means that I'm not playing the same character anymore. Yeah I agree he's always been the silent protagonist, he always will be unless they do something crazy and unwanted. But when I thought of Link it was always the same avatar. : ) but now he was "some quiet guy that was important a few years back." and that's now offical in the timeline.
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
GZGoten said:
I do want to clarify however, this doesn't make the new game bad. Just Skyward Sword XD but now when the new game remind me it's part of this Historia I am forced to remember that the Link I'm playing as is a new character as all the Links I played as before and all the events I know in the series as "stuff Link did" does not apply to this guy and thus if I want to get into him in the same sense as the Historia expects us to I have to intentionally disconnect myself from him as my avatar because he is a character, not to be confused with the other guys I played as in this game series. ^_^ That's fine, Final Fantasy has do it since the series began but that's a lot to expect from fans of a series who has loved it since the SNES.
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
that's where Link being a blank avatar actually helps. Think about it every game always talks about some legendary hero that wore a green tunic and save Hyrule long ago. So the games have never really shied away from the idea of there being different heroes. So it was always clear that each Link was a different Link. However there was a... link? between all these Links, they all had one thing in common, and it wasn't the Master Sword or the green tunic, their identical physical appearance OR their gender. No the thing that links all the Links (that sounds funny) is that they all have the Tri Force of Courage.

So in a way you could say that we the players are the tri force of courage and every time we play a Zelda game we play the new owner of the tri force of courage, and while it may not be the same avatar it is indeed the same tri force/personality/spirit/player/whatever you want to call it and because the tri force of courage can only be inherited by people with specific qualities it seems safe to say that every iteration of the Hero of legend is in fact a duplicate of the last hero of legend, so yes every time you see a Link it is in fact the same badass Link from 2 games ago, just in a different time setting and with different motives. In one time line he was trying to save the princess in another he may be trying to safe his sister, but regardless of time all the Link's are essentially the same person thus their avility to own the tri force of courage
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
GZGoten said:
Your post
That is a good way of looking at it and I do see your point. ^_^ And trust me, despite my negative opinion of the Hyrule Historia I see why other fans like it, and it doesn't dampen my interest for the Zelda U or Hyrule Warriors either. I still look forward to playing more games in the series.

But I did say it is a mindset change rather than an actual change in the game. Players used to create their own Zelda Universe because it was fun to them and now those same fans now merely guess what Nintendo is going to do despite my hunch that Nintendo just saw them with their good idea and created their own, never prior having any focus on this in the series before. So that was quite a big mindset change that made the universe a lot more formal for everyone which seems less fun in a way, but I wasn't in that group of people, that's just what I imagine for them.

The really big mindset change for me was Nintendo told me everything I was led to believe in the series was incorrect, which is fine but now I have to change my way of thinking of the game in timeline way of thinking and now my victories are longer grand and triumphant.

Now do keep in mind this is coming from someone who never actually read the Historia. I have seen the chart and know a general idea of where most of the games are on the chart but I never read the actual bood so I based this on the mindset I get, If you feel my mind could be changed if I read it do let me know.

Even before I put the game in my Wii U I know I'm just playing another Link, fighting another Ganondorf and while yes I will beat him now there will be more Ganondorfs in the future. What will happen to the current Zelda, or Princess Ruto, or Malon, Rito or Saria or the other friends I've met?

I obviously will never know but I do know for a fact that a new evil will be coming back and at least soon enough to where some of the events that take place will still matter in some way. Maybe some new evils showed up and Link was there to thwart them, maybe once or twice Impa stepped up to save the day and they all lived in general peace, but the games don't give any feedback on this, only "The evil you just defeated will be back again soon to try again."

This puts a kinda a troubling dark shroud between every game with this omni-threat looming over the series. How many Links have come since the last game, I know a new Link can appear between any game but did were all of them triumphant or did some of them fail? I mean Ganondorf is just as much a part of what makes me the hero so do I play only as those who are victorious? Do I die before the next Link is born or is he the new Link chosen the moment I complete my journey? Do I still have the power of the triforce when I am victorious? It doesn't seem likely with Ganondorf defeated there is a gap in the triforce, obviously it left him so it seems like a logical point when Zelda and Link's piece would choose it's next hero, villain and princess.

So I return to this world as a new Link, this world is still called Hyrule and the Deku Tree and Death Mountain are still here, but the kokiri kids are completely absent and Kokiris do not age or die as long as they stay in the forest which they were quite content on doing. And what happened to the Zoras?! They used to be beautiful and friendly but now they are violent monsters that attack on sight?

If anyone was to go forward an unknown amount of time and suddenly a race of people you knew to be friendly were suddenly violent monsters it would be so heartbreakingly jarring and lead into more worry about worst case scenarios.

So yeah, I kinda liked it better knowing that when I defeated the evil, it was defeated for good and there is closure to the story I was presented. Because even if I am an optimist and think, oh the evil never returned to endanger my friends and I again, HURRAY! That doesn't change the fact that between each game very unsettling facts do present themselves which a Zelda series with an official timeline unsympathetically does not address.
 

Hero of Lime

Staaay Fresh!
Jun 3, 2013
3,114
0
41
I actually liked both Skyward Sword and the Hyrule Historia. XD

For Skyward Sword, I would suggest you try it again. I know you felt like you could care less about the story and characters, but I feel like those two elements get better as the game goes on. Plus, story isn't the most important part of Zelda, design and gameplay are very important too. The Skyward Sword dungeons for example are excellent and some of the best in the series in my opinion. And trust me, it is nearly impossible to hate Groose by the end of the game. ;)

As for the timeline, I kinda agree with you. I personally have a timeline interpretation that I still swear by, even though I admit it is full of holes. That being said, I feel like they did a good job connecting the dots and making a cohesive timeline, even if they had to throw us a huge curve ball withe the third timeline. The only part I really dislike is Four Swords Adventures being placed after Twilight Princess, I think it belongs with the Minish Cap and Four Swords. That's just me of course, and I've learned to live with the official timeline, and my personal one.

As for the continuous feeling that Link's actions do not make Hyrule safe, while it may be depressing to see that, it makes sense. Everlasting peace is so unrealistic, even for a fantasy universe like the Legend of Zelda. With something like the Triforce always around, people will want its power and fight for it, hence the curse of the unending battle with the Hero, Goddess reborn, and Demise's manifestation of hatred. I actually love the idea that there is a lineage of Heroes as opposed to just being different interpretations of the same story as many view the series, it makes the world feel so much bigger.

Don't forget, the Hyrule Historia also states that you as the player should decide certain parts of the universe for yourself, the timeline they made is just what they feel is best. Eiji Anouma even encourages players to come up with their own.
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
Hero of Lime said:
That is good, ^_^ It's good you like the Historia. I know you read in length my opinion of it already so I need not say more. I don't know the overall consensus of people's reaction to it but I feel I am probably a minority in my opinion.

And yeah I totally see that there will always be something dangerous looming but it's also nice to know my character achieved something in the evil that he faced and I just don't like the dark implications that the game implies when you look between the 2 games. My example of the Zoras and the absence of the kokiris when the deku tree is still present. One cannot help but worry about the characters who I grew invested in.
 

Hero of Lime

Staaay Fresh!
Jun 3, 2013
3,114
0
41
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
That is good, ^_^ It's good you like the Historia. I know you read in length my opinion of it already so I need not say more. I don't know the overall consensus of people's reaction to it but I feel I am probably a minority in my opinion.

And yeah I totally see that there will always be something dangerous looming but it's also nice to know my character achieved something in the evil that he faced and I just don't like the dark implications that the game implies when you look between the 2 games. My example of the Zoras and the absence of the kokiris when the deku tree is still present. One cannot help but worry about the characters who I grew invested in.
I totally understand, I never liked the idea that as time went on the good Zoras, Kokiri, disappeared, and the Gorons were nowhere to be found. Particularly in the Hero's Defeat timeline. That's probably why I put those games before Ocarina of Time in my original personal timeline even if that makes less sense. XD
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
Hero of Lime said:
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
That is good, ^_^ It's good you like the Historia. I know you read in length my opinion of it already so I need not say more. I don't know the overall consensus of people's reaction to it but I feel I am probably a minority in my opinion.

And yeah I totally see that there will always be something dangerous looming but it's also nice to know my character achieved something in the evil that he faced and I just don't like the dark implications that the game implies when you look between the 2 games. My example of the Zoras and the absence of the kokiris when the deku tree is still present. One cannot help but worry about the characters who I grew invested in.
I totally understand, I never liked the idea that as time went on the good Zoras, Kokiri, disappeared, and the Gorons were nowhere to be found. Particularly in the Hero's Defeat timeline. That's probably why I put those games before Ocarina of Time in my original personal timeline even if that makes less sense. XD
well I'd be interested in having a look at your timeline if it's available. : ) I've read a few and thought they all died out when the Historia became well known.
 

Guffe

New member
Jul 12, 2009
5,106
0
0
Well you won't need to worry about the timeline in Hyrule Warriors since it was announced it'll be just a spinoff and has nothing to do with the main series, timeline or not, just a fun hack n slash :D

As for the timeline, there has always been a lot to say about it and so forth. I never really cared, I just waited for the next time I got to beat Gannon :)
I thought it was fun to read a few timelines and theories now and then, but the whole timeline thing never sunk into me. I just saw it maybe more as parallell universes in stead, of course a few were connected, like Ocarina ofTtime and MajorasMask, but most games I just thought more of an old grandfather telling his granddaughter/-son the same story everytime a bit re-emagined due to bad memory :p
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
Shigeru Miyamoto went on record himself and said that the time line was written on a handkerchief
Hyrule Historia says the timeline is subject to change, it's clear this timeline is just something to help Zelda theorist, not something that should consume your Zelda fandom.

While I can see your point about never really defeating evil, basing myself on the landscape alone it's safe to say that after the defeat of evil in any particular game everyone went on to have normal lives free of evil. Every game features a booming kingdom, huge houses, castles, towns, markets, and businesses. A world in peril wouldn't be able to develop in such a way and since each game takes place before the last it's safe to say nothing bad happened in between. Also remember that the only people that knew about the constant return of evil were Skyward Sword Link, Demise, and Zelda, the rest of the world is ignorant to this fact so as far as their concerned evil is defeated forever.
There's also Zelda 2 Adventures of Link, think what you will of the game it made one thing clear, Ganon's return can be stopped! And looking at where that game stands on the timeline



it looks like that timeline figured out a way to stop evil from ever returning. There's also the Oracle games where Ganon can't return unless he receives help and then there's Link Between Worlds where his return is thwarted by a mage that instead takes Ganon's power for himself.


also here's a question. Why are you so interested in continuing to play the same hero? If we would get the same Link as the last game not only would that Link be in the same world with the same skills as the last game but instead of viewing a story of overcoming great obstacles we would get a veteran of battle and puzle solving, kinda takes away the charm of from zero to hero :/
 

Hero of Lime

Staaay Fresh!
Jun 3, 2013
3,114
0
41
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
That is good, ^_^ It's good you like the Historia. I know you read in length my opinion of it already so I need not say more. I don't know the overall consensus of people's reaction to it but I feel I am probably a minority in my opinion.

And yeah I totally see that there will always be something dangerous looming but it's also nice to know my character achieved something in the evil that he faced and I just don't like the dark implications that the game implies when you look between the 2 games. My example of the Zoras and the absence of the kokiris when the deku tree is still present. One cannot help but worry about the characters who I grew invested in.
I totally understand, I never liked the idea that as time went on the good Zoras, Kokiri, disappeared, and the Gorons were nowhere to be found. Particularly in the Hero's Defeat timeline. That's probably why I put those games before Ocarina of Time in my original personal timeline even if that makes less sense. XD
well I'd be interested in having a look at your timeline if it's available. : ) I've read a few and thought they all died out when the Historia became well known.
Sure, I could PM you it since it will be super long, I just need to get it out of my brain and onto the computer. Plus I doubt anyone else would be much more interested in my silly timeline.
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
Guffe said:
Well you won't need to worry about the timeline in Hyrule Warriors since it was announced it'll be just a spinoff and has nothing to do with the main series, timeline or not, just a fun hack n slash :D

As for the timeline, there has always been a lot to say about it and so forth. I never really cared, I just waited for the next time I got to beat Gannon :)
I thought it was fun to read a few timelines and theories now and then, but the whole timeline thing never sunk into me. I just saw it maybe more as parallell universes in stead, of course a few were connected, like Ocarina ofTtime and MajorasMask, but most games I just thought more of an old grandfather telling his granddaughter/-son the same story everytime a bit re-emagined due to bad memory :p
Yep that is more or less what I thought of the series as well : )
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
Hero of Lime said:
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
DoubleU12 said:
Hero of Lime said:
That is good, ^_^ It's good you like the Historia. I know you read in length my opinion of it already so I need not say more. I don't know the overall consensus of people's reaction to it but I feel I am probably a minority in my opinion.

And yeah I totally see that there will always be something dangerous looming but it's also nice to know my character achieved something in the evil that he faced and I just don't like the dark implications that the game implies when you look between the 2 games. My example of the Zoras and the absence of the kokiris when the deku tree is still present. One cannot help but worry about the characters who I grew invested in.
I totally understand, I never liked the idea that as time went on the good Zoras, Kokiri, disappeared, and the Gorons were nowhere to be found. Particularly in the Hero's Defeat timeline. That's probably why I put those games before Ocarina of Time in my original personal timeline even if that makes less sense. XD
well I'd be interested in having a look at your timeline if it's available. : ) I've read a few and thought they all died out when the Historia became well known.
Sure, I could PM you it since it will be super long, I just need to get it out of my brain and onto the computer. Plus I doubt anyone else would be much more interested in my silly timeline.
O gawd, if I could rip everyone out of my brain and put it on a computer it would be an endless wall of text haha XD look at how many paragraphs I wrote on Hyrule Historia haha.
 

DoubleU12

New member
Oct 3, 2011
152
0
0
GZGoten said:
Shigeru Miyamoto went on record himself and said that the time line was written on a handkerchief
Hyrule Historia says the timeline is subject to change, it's clear this timeline is just something to help Zelda theorist, not something that should consume your Zelda fandom.

While I can see your point about never really defeating evil, basing myself on the landscape alone it's safe to say that after the defeat of evil in any particular game everyone went on to have normal lives free of evil. Every game features a booming kingdom, huge houses, castles, towns, markets, and businesses. A world in peril wouldn't be able to develop in such a way and since each game takes place before the last it's safe to say nothing bad happened in between. Also remember that the only people that knew about the constant return of evil were Skyward Sword Link, Demise, and Zelda, the rest of the world is ignorant to this fact so as far as their concerned evil is defeated forever.
There's also Zelda 2 Adventures of Link, think what you will of the game it made one thing clear, Ganon's return can be stopped! And looking at where that game stands on the timeline



it looks like that timeline figured out a way to stop evil from ever returning. There's also the Oracle games where Ganon can't return unless he receives help and then there's Link Between Worlds where his return is thwarted by a mage that instead takes Ganon's power for himself.


also here's a question. Why are you so interested in continuing to play the same hero? If we would get the same Link as the last game not only would that Link be in the same world with the same skills as the last game but instead of viewing a story of overcoming great obstacles we would get a veteran of battle and puzle solving, kinda takes away the charm of from zero to hero :/
That is a fair point as well. : ) It is at least victory for that Link isn't it. I would at least like them to show a little more detail on the actual process of transitioning from 1 Link to another before I can warm up to a Historia. : )
The link in my head always started anew cuz that's how every game starts but he carried over the life lessons he learned from before by merit of being my avatar. : ) but that is true, he is going into the game as an innocent.

I am glad the Historia says that but if you hear people talking about the Historia, they speak of it as practically religion at this point. "As a simple example PBG and Matt use the Hyrule Historia as a subject point for the Majora's Mask grief theory on Game Theory." A small point no doubt but the manner in which they refer to is much like how people speak of say point by point events that occurred in the game itself and. I often hear "I wonder where Hyrule Warriors and ZeldaU shall fall on the time line." : )

At least the big voices on the internet and the few small voices I read up on seem to. I''m not 100% familiar with the majority opinion of the Historia but usually big youtube names often speak (or forms) the common person's interpretation. (They almost have to to become popular XD hehe)
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
true enough... most youtubers and fans use the Historia as the single and most important point of reference and while they're not 100% correct to do so they're not incorrect either. You see this "timeline" is the only official information we have from Nintendo about the Zelda series being a connected set of events. And like any good fiction finding all these connections and discussing different theories about how they all relate is always fun to do if you're a fan. People love to talk about what might happen and how you deduce that theory based on the information you have at hand, using the Historia and caring about it isn't a bad thing, quite the opposite it shows how devoted you are as a fan that you want to know everything about the universe and it's lore even down to the smallest detail like the order in which things happen is.

as a side note I've met and talked with PBG a couple of times, the guy knows what his talking about. His love for Zelda series and how much of the lore he knows is surprising. I always thought it was an act to get more views but nope he legit loves the series and it's lore.

AND, as another side note. My only complaint about the Historia is that it doesn't bring an alphabet of Hylian writing so I need to rely on online translations because I don't have time to learn it :(