JoJoDeathunter said:
The Virgo said:
I know I'm going to sound like a troll for saying this, so I want to apologize for it right now because I'm not, but I actually felt a little bit of disappointment when I saw that video.
Why can't some people just accept that some things are impossible and deal with it? The only reason that took place is because she was a child. If it had been an adult, nobody would have given a flying fuck.
If some 35-year-old wanted to see his dad before he died, nobody would have given a shit, but OOOOHHHH some little girl wants to see her daddy, awwww, how sad. *rollseyes*
It's not "innocence", it's called "lack of intelligence". What's the point of innocence anyway? I must say that the people who don't have it anymore are the ones who get things done! That's why children slobber all over themselves and eat paste while the adults get things done! Just the way it should be ...
Sorry for the late reply, I've been unable to get online for the last three days approx.
Don't worry about it, it's cool.
JoJoDeathunter said:
Anyway, it evidently wasn't impossible for the little girl to see her dad again since it happened, and it does matter if it's a child since children depend completely on their parents or caregivers unlike adults do. Only the lowest sort of scum want to hurt children and denying a dying child a last chance to be with one of the most important figures in their life is pretty deep on that scale. I wouldn't want anyone to do that to my 7 year old sister, so I won't stand for it happening to any other child.
Yes, you do have a point, but here's something to consider: Her dad was in minimum security for drug charges. How long has he been in jail? She was ten years old. If he was in jail for 3 years, that almost half of her life she hasn't seen him. The last time she would have seen him was when she was 7. How close was she to her dad?
That's one thing that was never exactly said. Did she want to see her dad because they were close or because she hadn't really known him? All the video said was that he had a drug conviction. That's pretty vague. It could mean that he was selling drugs, moving drugs or doing drugs. If he was doing drugs, what kind? It could mean cocaine, marijuana, LSD, mescaline, meth, angel dust, Valkyr V (Max Payne reference ;-) ) or anything like that.
My points are this: 1.) The news media has always twisted things around and, while they may have not this time, they may have made something look totally different without telling a lie and 2.) If he was an addict, it is a known fact that addicts either are abusive to their family or are always away from them.