Okay, this is disgusting.

Recommended Videos

jessegeek

New member
Oct 31, 2011
91
0
0
Deadpool062 said:
Bobic said:
What a hilariously racist way of reporting on a rather unhilarious story.

Are you sure this guy isn't trolling? It could be just a nutter but it does seem rather over the top.
Unfortunately no, these guy's are not trolling. Actually its written by a woman. Scary.
Imo there's nothing more or less scary about a racist woman than a racist man. The only difference I've ever seen is that the racist women I've come across tend to be more duplicitous than their male counterparts (ie, comment about me and my friends (I'm mixed race and two of my friends had started dating, making them an interracial couple) to their neighbours rather than saying/ doing anything to our faces, which we mainly got from male racists.

Abandon4093 said:
The scary thing is the person who's running the blog seems fairly intelligent.

At the least, he's articulate enough to get his point across without seeming like a total nimrod. Fuck knows what you do with these types of people. The really dumb racists you can just ignore. Because they're just fucking stupid. No need to dwell on the idiots. But when you find one that's a vehement racist that can still string a sentence together. Well, what do you do? Ignore it and it could garner more attention. Decry it and they'll use you. Censor it and they'll be a martyr.

Yup, the seemingly reasonable ones are always the most dangerous.
Whilst they are intelligent enough to have constructed a coherent "opinion article" (for want of a better word) they wrote 'gun-loving patriots' as 'Gun loving Patriots' and illustrated the supposed problem of escalating ethnic minority knife crime with multiple images of guns. Also, they referred to their own audience with a racial slur. Even the pretend-smart ones can be beaten down with simple logic and good, well-structured arguments. I don't really understand what you mean by 'decry it and they'll use you'; what can they use you for?

Personally, I find that the unchallenged ones are the most dangerous. If people let the ignorant go around trumpeting their views unchallenged, more morons might get the idea that those views are tolerated by mainstream society. It promotes their crusader mentality by fuelling the notion of a 'silent majority'.

EDIT: ninja'd on the point about it being written by a woman.
 

Patrick Buck

New member
Nov 14, 2011
749
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35TbGjt-weA

But seriously, wow. Thats an impressive amount of racism and stupidity you can fit into one articel.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
I'll admit I am uninformed on this subject - but I've never understood how a person can "deny the holocaust". I mean do they think the Jews were sent to amusement parks? Or are they just trying to say the genocide was something else, like the work of "god"?
 

jessegeek

New member
Oct 31, 2011
91
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
jessegeek said:
Abandon4093 said:
The scary thing is the person who's running the blog seems fairly intelligent.

At the least, he's articulate enough to get his point across without seeming like a total nimrod. Fuck knows what you do with these types of people. The really dumb racists you can just ignore. Because they're just fucking stupid. No need to dwell on the idiots. But when you find one that's a vehement racist that can still string a sentence together. Well, what do you do? Ignore it and it could garner more attention. Decry it and they'll use you. Censor it and they'll be a martyr.

Yup, the seemingly reasonable ones are always the most dangerous.
Whilst they are intelligent enough to have constructed a coherent "opinion article" (for want of a better word) they wrote 'gun-loving patriots' as 'Gun loving Patriots' and illustrated the supposed problem of escalating ethnic minority knife crime with multiple images of guns. Also, they referred to their own audience with a racial slur. Even the pretend-smart ones can be beaten down with simple logic and good, well-structured arguments. I don't really understand what you mean by 'decry it and they'll use you'; what can they use you for?

Personally, I find that the unchallenged ones are the most dangerous. If people let the ignorant go around trumpeting their views unchallenged, more morons might get the idea that those views are tolerated by mainstream society. It promotes their crusader mentality by fuelling the notion of a 'silent majority'.
There's plenty of evidence on there of them using peoples confrontation with them to further their own agenda. Saying anyone who disagrees with them is part of some anti-white conspiracy.
Ah okay I get what you were driving at now. However, I still feel that if multiple people come out and decry something, they might eventually get it into their heads that they are not the majority, and that maybe people of *all* races don't benefit from their vitriol. The anti-white conspiracy idea still hinges on the implied belief of a silent majority, (as for something to be a conspiracy it has to be a minority otherwise it's just you not being in on a plan) so a large amount of proactive non-racists from all walks of life would still blow it out of the water. I don't mean in the form of a protest group, as I agree that would just fan the flames, just as individuals standing up for what they believe in on a case-by-case basis, including "little" stuff like challenging people who use offensive language in a work environment etc, as well as more widely circulated nonsense like this blog.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Wolfram01 said:
I'll admit I am uninformed on this subject - but I've never understood how a person can "deny the holocaust". I mean do they think the Jews were sent to amusement parks? Or are they just trying to say the genocide was something else, like the work of "god"?
They say it didn't happen. The claim is that the six milion victims were not actually killed. Milder Holocaust deniers say it wasn't as severe as is claimed, while the more radical ones outright claim it didn't happen, and was made up to get pro-Jewish feelings.

On-Topic: How can you have a faux-newspaper? You can have a faux-news paper, but the other is a very different term. One would refer to a paper that prints pretend news, like the Onion, while the other would be a newspaper that doesn't really exist.

That probably wasn't the worst thing to pick up on in that article but hey, I like my arrogant, ignorant, racist wastes of humanity to be at the least educated in simple linguistics before they start a blog.
 

WeAreStevo

New member
Sep 22, 2011
449
0
0
Wow....what a lovely way to start my day than by reading some shitheads racist rantings...

People like this disgust me...
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Blargh McBlargh said:
1) Ignore website
2) Move on with life
3) ?????
4) PROFIT!!
...as the problems continue to exist and escalate.

Ignoring bad stuff never fixed it.
 

kuolonen

New member
Nov 19, 2009
290
0
0
cthulhlu said:
A racist man once said "Could white people just shut the fuck up now please?"
You had a little typo there, fixed it for ya.
OT: What? Its not exactly new that these people exist. You dont like it, how about you make good on those hilarious internet tough guy threats and go gun them down. At least show some conviction if you wish someone dead.