On the Cover: "Land of Confusion" by Disturbed

Recommended Videos
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
In 1986, Genesis released their biggest album Invisible Touch. One of those songs on it was a #4 hit in the U.S. titled "Land of Confusion", a song about the band's uneasiness with the world around them, as well as a willingness to make it better. In 2005, Disturbed did a cover of the song for their album Ten Thousand Fists, with their version making it all the way to #1 on the Top Mainstream Rock Songs list. But which version is better?

Each version has quite a different feel to it. Genesis uses synthesizers and amplified, but not distorted, guitars, giving the song a prog rock feel. On the other hand, Disturbed takes out the synthesizers and increases the distortion on the guitar, giving their version a hard rock feel to it. Both versions have quite a bit of merit, but with the message of the song, I feel the harder, angrier instruments fit better, while the prog rock version is more pleasant to listen to.

Peyote is a wonderful thing for music videos.

On the other hand, the vocals have, surprisingly enough, more in common with each other than differences. Phil Collins has a clean voice, and is capable of hitting quite high notes. However, he doesn't push himself for this song, staying in a higher, but not overly high "kicked in the balls", register. This allows for David Draiman, the vocalist for Disturbed, to match his register, despite his rougher voice. In fact, near the end of the song, Draiman actually surpasses Collins pitch-wise. Once again, however, Collins is a bit more pleasant to listen to, while Draiman's voice fits the intended message of the song better.

Which version is better? This is really a close call, and I'm sure while some will agree with my decision, just as many will disagree strongly. But in my opinion, Disturbed just manages to get the message of the song across better than Genesis. While Genesis's version is more pleasant, pleasant isn't always fitting. And in this case, Disturbed's rougher, harsher tone is an improvement. Both versions are incredible, however.

Anime-light never made a better music video.
 

roneel

New member
Nov 10, 2010
29
0
0
personally i like the disturbed version, but both are on my mp3 player:)
 

BarbaricGoose

New member
May 25, 2010
796
0
0
Comparing Genesis to Disturbed is like comparing a really great thing to an average-at-best thing... sorry, I'm pretty bad at analogies. Disturbed could've performed the song a lot worse, but I think the original is miles better. Disturbed should stick to their strength: releasing albums that sound identical to each other.

And I know this isn't about which band is better, but Genesis has more talent in their collective pinky finger than Disturbed has... everywhere in their... body... sorry, there I go again, screwing up an otherwise good analogy. Or maybe it's a metaphor... maybe that's why I'm so bad at analogies. Maybe I don't know what an analogy is, and I'm actually bad at metaphors... hm...

And just out of curiosity, what is this "On the Cover" thing?
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
After listening to both of them I find myself drawn more to the Genesis one. The disturbed video was good and I liked the animation in it. I just like Phil Collins vocals more than the vocals in the Disturbed video. Plus, I like the puppetry more as well.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
BarbaricGoose said:
Comparing Genesis to Disturbed is like comparing a really great thing to an average-at-best thing... sorry, I'm pretty bad at analogies. Disturbed could've performed the song a lot worse, but I think the original is miles better. Disturbed should stick to their strength: releasing albums that sound identical to each other.

And I know this isn't about which band is better, but Genesis has more talent in their collective pinky finger than Disturbed has... everywhere in their... body... sorry, there I go again, screwing up an otherwise good analogy. Or maybe it's a metaphor... maybe that's why I'm so bad at analogies. Maybe I don't know what an analogy is, and I'm actually bad at metaphors... hm...

And just out of curiosity, what is this "On the Cover" thing?
"On the Cover" is an irregular series of reviews I do where I take a cover song and compare it to the original. So far, I've done this one, Johnny Cash's "Hurt" (Johnny Cash version won), and Tori Amos's "I Don't Like Mondays" (the original Boomtown Rats version won).

And I knew I was going to be getting some disagreements. But that's the thing with reviews. They are totally subjective.
 

xmbts

Still Approved by Shock
Legacy
May 30, 2010
20,800
37
53
Country
United States
It's very subjective based on personal taste and probably a bit on which you hear first. I can't really decide though.
 

ChupathingyX

New member
Jun 8, 2010
3,716
0
0
Both great video clips, both great songs, however, I'm going to have to give it to Disturbed.

I just prefer the more heavy sound of it, and I'm a bit of a Disturbed fan myself.
 

godofallu

New member
Jun 8, 2010
1,663
0
0
Yeah Distrubed's version is way better.

That said there would never have been a Disturbed version if not for Genesis.
 

Luke5515

New member
Aug 25, 2008
1,197
0
0
I like Disturbed's version better because I like that kind of music better.
Sometimes covers are hard to compare because they're just so darn different, like saying
"which is better Master of Puppets or the Flight of the Bumblebee?"
 

Lt. Vinciti

New member
Nov 5, 2009
1,285
0
0
Genesis....it hits more closer to home (back in the 80s and such)also it doesnt have that weird orgasm sound that David Draiman has to put into the song...
 

Vausch

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,476
0
0
It's a mood thing for me. Not liking and worried about my world, Genesis version. HATING and worried about my world, Disturbed. Disturbed plays much more often as of late.